| Literature DB >> 34885303 |
Xiaonan Wang1, Peiquan Xu1,2, Pengyu Zhang1, Shuyue Ma1.
Abstract
Supercapacitors have the unique advantages of high power density, fast charge and discharge rates, long cycle life, high safety, and reliability, and are increasingly being used for applications including automobiles, rail transit, communication equipment, digital electronics, and aerospace equipment. The supercapacitor industry is currently in a stage of rapid development; great breakthroughs have also been made in improving the performance of supercapacitors and the expansion of their application. Electrode technology is the core of supercapacitors. Transition-metal compounds have a relatively high theoretical capacity and have received widespread attention as electrode materials for supercapacitors. In addition, there is a synergistic effect between the different components of various electrode composite materials. Due to their superior electrochemical performance, supercapacitors are receiving increasing research attention. Flexible supercapacitors have been hailed for their good plasticity, resulting in a development boom. This review article mainly outlines the development process of various electrode materials, including carbon materials, conductive polymers, metal compounds, and composite materials, as well as flexible electrode materials based on carbon cloth.Entities:
Keywords: carbon cloth; carbon materials; composite materials; conductive polymers; metal compounds; supercapacitors
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885303 PMCID: PMC8658651 DOI: 10.3390/ma14237148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Increasing trend of the number of publications related to supercapacitors based on CC in the past decade. These results were obtained by searching the Web of Science for articles with the keywords “supercapacitor”, “carbon cloth”, and “carbon fiber cloth” included in their titles.
Carbon materials for supercapacitors.
| Material | The Highest Capacities | Specific Surface Area | Specific Power Densities | Specific Energy Densities | Specific Capacitance Retention | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activated carbon | 125 F·g−1 | - | - | - | - | [ |
| CBs | 250 F·g−1 | 28–1690 m2·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| Carbon aerogels | 46 F·cm−3 | - | - | - | - | [ |
| Carbon aerogels | 77 F·cm−3 (104 F·g−1) | - | - | - | - | [ |
| MWCNTs | 135 F·g−1 | 470 m2·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| SWCNTs | 283 F·g−1 | - | - | - | - | [ |
| Tubes-in-tube CNTs | 315 F·g−1 | - | - | - | - | [ |
| GS-CNTs | 326.5 F·g−1 | - | 78.29 kW·kg−1 | 21.74 Wh·kg−1 | - | [ |
| HCMSs | 251 F·g−1 | - | - | - | 98% (after 200 cycles) | [ |
| OLC | - | - | 195.0 W·cm−3 | 2.9 mWh·cm−3 | - | [ |
| NPCs | 222 F·g−1 | - | - | - | - | [ |
| S-carbon | - | - | - | - | - | [ |
Properties of conductive polymers for supercapacitors prepared by various methods.
| Materials | Method | Specific | Specific Power Densities | Specific Energy | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poly 3-(Phenylthiophene) derivatives | Electrochemical polymerization | - | 5 kW·kg−1 | 50 Wh·kg−1 | [ |
| PCDT | Electrochemical polymerization | - | 1 kW·kg−1 | 6 Wh·kg−1 | [ |
| PAN | Deposition | - | - | - | [ |
| Py | Chemical polymerization | 400 F·g−1 | - | - | [ |
| PPy | Electrochemical deposition | 427 F·g−1 | - | - | [ |
| PPy | Electro polymerization | 586 F·g−1 | - | - | [ |
| PPy | In-situ chemical oxidative polymerization | 2732 mF·cm−2 | 129.35 mW·cm−2 | 242.84 µWh·cm−2 | [ |
| (E)-α-cyanoethylene thiophene derivatives | Electrochemical polymerization | - | 1.6 kW·kg−1 | 8.6 Wh·kg−1 | [ |
Properties of metal compounds for supercapacitors prepared by various methods.
| Materials | Method | Specific Capacitance | Specific Power Density | Specific Energy Density | Specific Capacitance Retention | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RuO2·xH2O powder | Sol-gel process | 720 F·g−1 | - | 26.7 Wh·kg−1 | - | [ |
| RuO2 films | Electrodeposition | 1190 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| Ru0.6Sn0.4O2·nH2O | Hydrothermal | 830 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| RuO2-VO2 solid solution | Polymerizable-complex | 1210 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| In2O3 | Electrochemical deposition | 190 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| NiO film | Electrochemical precipitation | - | - | - | - | [ |
| NiO nanosheet | Hydrothermal | 989 F g−1 | - | 49.45 Wh·kg−1 | 97% (after 1000 cycles) | [ |
| cobalt oxide | Deposition | 165 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| CuO multilayer nanosheets | CBD | 43 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| MnO2 | - | 398 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| Mn3O4 thin films | SILAR | 314 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| CoS nanowires | Biomolecule-assisted hydrothermal | 508 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| CuS nanotubes | - | 2393 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| M-MoS2-H2O system | Hydrothermal | 380 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| Ni(OH)2 | Hydrothermal | 1715 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| α-Co(OH)2 nanowire arrays (NWAs) | Hydrothermal | 642.5 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| FeVO4 nanoparticles | Co-precipitation | 972 F·g−1 | 1326 kW·kg−1 | 21 Wh·kg−1 | - | [ |
| NiCo2O4 NSs@HMRAs | Electrodeposition | 678 F·g−1 | - | 15.42 Wh·kg−1 | 96.06% (after 1500 cycles) | [ |
| CoNi2S4 | Hydrothermal | 2906 F·g−1 | 409 W·kg−1 | 33.9 Wh·kg−1 | - | [ |
| Sn-Co binary oxide nanosheets | Hydrothermal | 937.4 F·g−1 | - | - | 97.5% (after 20,000 cycles) | [ |
| CuSbSe2 | Colloidal | - | - | - | 99.5% (after 200 cycles) | [ |
| Coral-Like LiFePO4 Particles | Chemical etching | 359 F·g−1 | - | - | 82.3% (after 2000 cycles) | [ |
| γ-KCoPO4 | Sol-gel | 222 C·g−1 | 1.6 kW·kg−1 | 28 Wh·kg−1 | - | [ |
| Mn-Co-Fe HNPs | Electrodeposition | 1200 F·g−1 | 1125 W·kg−1 | 11.4 Wh·kg−1 | 96% (after 4000 cycles) | [ |
| Co-Mo-O-S porous microspheres | Hydrothermal | 1134 F·g−1 | - | 67.6 Wh·kg−1 | - | [ |
Properties of composite materials for supercapacitors prepared by various methods.
| Materials | Method | Specific Capacitance Density | Specific Power Density | Specific Energy Density | Specific Capacitance Retention | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon-ruthenium xerogels | Sol-gel | 256 F·g−1 | - | - | Almost 100% | [ |
| RuO2/CNT | - | 340 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| RuO2·xH2O/CB | Novel incipient wetness | 647 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| Co, Mn, Cu, Fe, Zn-doped carbon aerogels | Impregnation | 100 F·g−1 (Co) | - | - | - | [ |
| MoO3/AC | Impregnation | 177 F·g−1 | - | - | 94% | [ |
| ITO/AC | Reverse precipitation | - | - | - | - | [ |
| WO3/CA carbon aerogel | Immersion-calcination | 700 F·g−1 | - | - | 95% | [ |
| Graphene-MnO2 | Self-limiting deposition | 310 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| Mesh-like Fe2O3/C | Template free greener | 315 F·g−1 | - | 37 Wh·kg−1 | 88.9% | [ |
| CuO-NC | Hard templating | 300 F·g−1 | - | - | 91% | [ |
| Co(OH)2/USY | Chemical precipitation | 958 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| NiO/CNT | Hydrothermal | 1329 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| Graphene/Co3O4 nanowire | Hydrothermal | 1100 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| Graphene sheets/Ag2S | Solvothermal | 1063 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| Ni3S2/MWCNT | Hydrothermal | 800 F·g−1 | 798 W·kg−1 | 19.8 Wh·kg−1 | 90% | [ |
| α-Ni(OH)2-GO | Hydrothermal | 1760.7 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| BiMn2O5-MWCNT | Hydrothermal | 540 F·g−1 | 3.6 kW kg−1 | 13 Wh kg−1 | - | [ |
| Co-Al LDH-NS/GO | LBL | 880 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| CoMoO4/graphene | Hydrothermal | 394.5 F·g−1 | 197.2 W·kg−1 | 54.8 Wh·kg−1 | - | [ |
| NG-NiMnO3 | Hydrothermal | 750.2 F·g−1 | - | [ | ||
| Co3S4-NG | Hydrothermal | 2427 F·g−1 | - | [ | ||
| NiV2O6/Ni(HCO3)2 nanoflake arrays | Hydrothermal | 7.94 F·cm−2 | 4.983 mW·cm−2 | 0.415 mWh·cm−2 | 106.2% | [ |
| Mn/PbOx | Chemical reduction | 185 F·g−1 | - | [ | ||
| Co3O4/Ni(OH)2O | Electrochemical deposition | 1144 F·g−1 | - | [ | ||
| NiMoO4/CoMoO4 nanorods | Hydrothermal | 1164 F·g−1 | 3750 W·kg−1 | 17.5 Wh·kg−1 | 87.5% | [ |
| Ag QDs/NiMoO4 | Dipping and drying | 3342.7 F·g−1 | 212.5 kW·kg−1 | 48.5 Wh·kg−1 | - | [ |
| Ppy@NiCo2S4 core-shell heterostructure | Hydrothermal | 908.1 F·g−1 | 160 W·kg−1 | 50.82 Wh·kg−1 | 126.6% | [ |
| Co@Co3O4 core-shell 3DN | Surface oxidating | 1049 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| Core-shell hollow CoMoS4@Ni-Co-S nanotubes | Hydrothermal | 2208.5 F·g−1 | 800 W·kg−1 | 49.1 Wh·kg−1 | 90.3% | [ |
Properties of materials based on CC for supercapacitors prepared by various methods.
| Materials | Method | Specific Capacitance Density | Specific Power Density | Specific Energy Density | Specific Capacitance Retention | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | Electrochemical anodization | 35 F·g−1 | - | - | - | [ |
| N-doped activated CC | One-step etching & doping (E&D) | 215.9 F·g−1 | - | - | 98% | [ |
| Graphene | Peroxide-assisted hydrothermal | 70 mF·cm−2 | [ | |||
| NiCo2S4/CC | Hydrothermal | 1638 F·g−1 | 799.6 W·kg−1 | 25.2 Wh·kg−1 | - | [ |
| Ni-Co-S/ACC | Hydrothermal | 2392 F·g−1 | 800.2 W·kg−1 | 30.1 Wh·kg−1 | 82% (10,000 cycles) | [ |
| α-Fe2O3/C nanoarrays on CC | Hydrothermal | 391.8 F·g−1 | - | - | 91.8% (4000 cycles) | [ |
| NiCo2S4@NiCoxSy on CC | Hydrothermal | 3.9 F·cm−2 | - | - | - | [ |
| α-Fe2O3/PPy nanoarrays on CC | Hydrothermal and in situ vapor-phase polymerization | 382.4 mF·cm−2 | - | - | - | [ |
| Hierarchical Co(OH)2@ | Hydrothermal | 2229 F·g−1 | 1000 W·kg−1 | 159.5 Wh·kg−1 | 100% (5000 cycles) | [ |
| ZIF−67 on CC | Dipping | 829 F·g−1 | - | - | 103% (15,000 cycles) | [ |
| ROCC@PDAA on CC | In-situ chemical oxidation polymerization | 81.9 F·g−1 | - | - | 159% (20,000 cycles) | [ |
| NiO nanoflake arrays on CC | CBD | 660 F·g−1 | - | - | 82% (4000 cycles) | [ |
| MoO3 film on CC | Electrodeposition | 835 F·g−1 | 1000 W·kg−1 | 78 Wh·kg−1 | 98% (8000 cycles) | [ |
| MoS2 nanospheres on CC | Hydrothermal | 368 F·g−1 | 128 W·kg−1 | 5.42 Wh·kg−1 | 96.5% (after 5000 cycles) | [ |
| Ni(OH)2 on CC | Hydrothermal | 789 F·g−1 | 1.4 kW·kg−1 | 41.1 Wh·kg−1 | 98%; 97.6% (after 5000 cycles) | [ |
| P-doped NiCo2S4 nanotube arrays on CC | Hydrothermal | 8.03 F·cm−2 | 750 W·kg−1 | 42.1 Wh·kg−1 | 87.5% (5000 cycles) | [ |
| NCLP@ | Hydrothermal | 2318 F·g−1 | 750 W·kg−1 | 42.2 W h kg−1 | - | [ |
| PANI-NWs/CC | Electrochemical polymerization | 1079 F·g−1 | 12.1 kW·kg−1 | 100.9 Wh·kg−1 | - | [ |
| NC LDH | Electrochemical deposition | 1133.3 mF·cm−2 | - | - | 80.47% (2000 cycles) | [ |
| Ni-Co LDH Nanoflakes–ZnO nanowires hybrid array on CC | Hydrothermal | 927 F·g−1 | 46.15 kW·kg−1 | 45.55 Wh·kg−1 | 96.02% (3000 cycles) | [ |
Figure 2(a) Digital photograph of commercial CC with area of 1 × 4 cm2; (b–f) SEM images of several compounds with different structures grown on CC [107,108,109,110,111]. Adapted from [108,109,110,111], with permission from Elsevier, 2020.
Figure 3SEM images of (a) sea-urchin-like Ni–Co–S compound on CC, (b) Ni–Co–S nano-needle on CC, and (c) Ni–Co–Fe–S nanoparticles on CC.