| Literature DB >> 34884752 |
David A Gascoigne1, Natalya A Serdyukova2,3, Daniil P Aksenov1,4.
Abstract
Human and animal studies have elucidated the apparent neurodevelopmental effects resulting from neonatal anesthesia. Observations of learning and behavioral deficits in children, who were exposed to anesthesia early in development, have instigated a flurry of studies that have predominantly utilized animal models to further interrogate the mechanisms of neonatal anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity. Specifically, while neonatal anesthesia has demonstrated its propensity to affect multiple cell types in the brain, it has shown to have a particularly detrimental effect on the gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic system, which contributes to the observed learning and behavioral deficits. The damage to GABAergic neurons, resulting from neonatal anesthesia, seems to involve structure-specific changes in excitatory-inhibitory balance and neurovascular coupling, which manifest following a significant interval after neonatal anesthesia exposure. Thus, to better understand how neonatal anesthesia affects the GABAergic system, we first review the early development of the GABAergic system in various structures that have been the focus of neonatal anesthesia research. This is followed by an explanation that, due to the prolonged developmental curve of the GABAergic system, the entirety of the negative effects of neonatal anesthesia on learning and behavior in children are not immediately evident, but instead take a substantial amount of time (years) to fully develop. In order to address these concerns going forward, we subsequently offer a variety of in vivo methods which can be used to record these delayed effects.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; animal; excitatory/inhibitory balance; human; infants; interneurons; isoflurane; neurovascular coupling; sevoflurane; toxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34884752 PMCID: PMC8657958 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222312951
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1A schematic illustration of E-I physiology and balance. (a) A target neuron (TN) receives input from both inhibitory (IN) and excitatory neurons (EN). (b) If these inputs are “balanced”, TN fires relatively slowly. (c) If the inhibitory input is weak, the firing rate of TN increases. (d) If the inhibitory input is absent, TN can go into a seizure state. Additionally, we illustrated this scheme with examples of actual recordings. Local field potentials (LFP), multi-unit activity (MUA) and single units (SU) were recorded from layer IV of somatosensory cortex in awake adult rabbits (for experimental setup see [40]). (e) In the absence of stimulation, the baseline activity in somatosensory cortex can be very slow. (f) However, after the local injection of the gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA)-antagonist picrotoxin (PTX, 0.06 nmol/μL), neuronal activity visibly increased. (g) This effect is further shown in the temporal dynamics of spikes in a selected SU. Note that this neuron was nearly silent before injection. The red arrow indicates the time of the injection. (h) If the dose of PTX is higher (0.3 nmol/μL), both LFP and MUA go into seizure (functionally failed) states. (i) For these three scenarios the stimulus processing is characterized by a strong relative response to stimulation under a balanced state, by a weaker relative but higher in absolute magnitude response to stimulation under a slightly imbalanced state and by the absence of a response under a failed state (strong imbalance). Note that the nature of failed state depends on the brain structure. For example, in the cerebral cortex the failed state is related to seizure activity while in the cerebellum the failed state is related to the saturation of the neuronal response in highly elevated baseline. (j) Our actual data [70] illustrates the observation of a relatively small and strong imbalance (not shown). Activity of single units (N = 55) was recorded from deep cerebellar nuclei before and after injection of PTX (2.5 nmol/μL). PTX increased both baseline activity and the level of absolute response to conditioned (CS) and unconditioned (US) stimuli but decreased the relative (to the baseline) response.
Figure 2The impact of neonatal anesthesia on the development of interneurons in the hippocampus. (a–c) The schematic shows normal development of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic interneurons (orange cell bodies with blue nuclei) in layers of the hippocampus. As the interneurons develop, (a) corresponds to the newborn state whereas (c) corresponds to the mature level of development), their axons lengthen and dendritic branches increase in complexity. Note, dendrites of target neurons (in black) are unchanged in the figures to demonstrate continuity of location in the observed neurons; in reality, they would also show morphological development concurrently with the interneurons. (d) Following exposure to neonatal anesthesia, we expect to see a decrease in the number of interneurons and reduction in their dendritic complexity. To compensate for the decrease in their quantity, interneurons can increase axonal length and number of targets. The following were adapted from our previous study [113]. (e–h) The results of a comparative analysis between control subjects and those exposed to neonatal anesthesia are shown. (e) Volumetry of the adult rabbit hippocampus revealed a significant reduction in the hippocampal volumes of subjects exposed to neonatal anesthesia. (f,g) Fractional anisotropy (FA) maps of representative adult subjects from the control (f) and neonatal anesthesia (g) groups show significant changes in the direction of water diffusion, with the most notable changes in the CA1 region (indicated by the arrows) (h), which exhibited a significant increase in FA and decrease in radial diffusivity, indicative of lower levels dendritic branching and neurodegeneration (represented in (d)). The layers of the hippocampus shown in (a–d) are labeled as follows: stratum oriens (SO), pyramidal cell (PY), stratum radiatum (SR) and stratum lacunosum-moleculare (SL) layer. (e,h) Statistical significance is indicated by the asterisks: one asterisk indicates p < 0.05, two asterisks indicate p < 0.01 and three asterisks indicate p < 0.001.