| Literature DB >> 34884731 |
Constança Júnior1,2, Maria Narciso1,2, Esther Marhuenda1,3,4, Isaac Almendros1,3,4, Ramon Farré1,3,4, Daniel Navajas1,2,3, Jorge Otero1,2,3, Núria Gavara1,2.
Abstract
Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a progressive disease that disrupts the mechanical homeostasis of the lung extracellular matrix (ECM). These effects are particularly relevant in the lung context, given the dynamic nature of cyclic stretch that the ECM is continuously subjected to during breathing. This work uses an in vivo model of pulmonary fibrosis to characterize the macro- and micromechanical properties of lung ECM subjected to stretch. To that aim, we have compared the micromechanical properties of fibrotic ECM in baseline and under stretch conditions, using a novel combination of Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and a stretchable membrane-based chip. At the macroscale, fibrotic ECM displayed strain-hardening, with a stiffness one order of magnitude higher than its healthy counterpart. Conversely, at the microscale, we found a switch in the stretch-induced mechanical behaviour of the lung ECM from strain-hardening at physiological ECM stiffnesses to strain-softening at fibrotic ECM stiffnesses. Similarly, we observed solidification of healthy ECM versus fluidization of fibrotic ECM in response to stretch. Our results suggest that the mechanical behaviour of fibrotic ECM under stretch involves a potential built-in mechanotransduction mechanism that may slow down the progression of PF by steering resident fibroblasts away from a pro-fibrotic profile.Entities:
Keywords: atomic force microscopy; extracellular matrix; fibrosis; mechanosensing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34884731 PMCID: PMC8657558 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222312928
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Epifluorescense images of immunostainings performed on a control (top row) and fibrotic (bottom row) groups. DAPI (A,D) was used to ensure no cellular content was kept after decellularization. Collagen (B,E) and elastin (C,F) were stained and are present in both ECMs. Arrows indicate regions with thickened walls in fibrotic samples and normal wall appearance in the healthy counterparts. Scale bar = 50 m.
Figure 2Hydroxyproline (HDP) content in g per mg of tissue. Data (N = 6 for healthy and N = 8 for fibrotic lungs) is shown as mean (center line in the box) ± SD (whiskers). There were no differences between groups ().
Figure 3Macromechanics of decellularized lung strips subjected to uniaxial tensile testing. (A,B) represent the stress–strain relationship of healthy lung ECM strips and fibrotic strips, respectively. (C,D) show the dependence of the with stress, on healthy and fibrotic samples, respectively. Data (N = 6 for healthy and N = 8 for fibrotic lungs) is shown as mean (black solid lines) ± SE (dashed red lines).
Figure 4Young’s Modulus measured by AFM. Boxplots represent the distribution of the data by (left) and (right). The center line in the boxplots represents the median value. (* ).
Figure 5Dependence of the (/) on the Young’s modulus () measured in the initial baseline state. Red data points account for measurements performed in bleomycin-treated lungs and blue points for the healthy lungs.
Figure 6Frequency-dependent shear elastic moduli of fibrotic lungs (left panel) and healthy lungs (right panel). Solid and dashed lines are fits of the two-power law model. Black and purple circles are measurements done in baseline and stretched states, respectively. Data are mean ± SE (N = 14). Fit parameters are shown in Table 1.
Parameters of a two-power law and estimated transition frequency. The parameters were fitted to data acquired for the fibrotic and healthy lungs in baseline and stretched. was derived from mean model parameters. Value for the high frequency exponent variable was fixed at ¾ [31]. Values are shown as mean ± SE.
| A(kPa) |
| B(kPa) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| healthy static |
|
|
| 236 |
| healthy stretch |
|
|
| 142 | |
| fibrotic static |
|
|
| 78 | |
| fibrotic stretch |
|
|
| 164 |