| Literature DB >> 34883908 |
Martina Serafini1, Federica Mariani1, Isacco Gualandi1, Francesco Decataldo2, Luca Possanzini2, Marta Tessarolo2, Beatrice Fraboni2, Domenica Tonelli1, Erika Scavetta1.
Abstract
The next future strategies for improved occupational safety and health management could largely benefit from wearable and Internet of Things technologies, enabling the real-time monitoring of health-related and environmental information to the wearer, to emergency responders, and to inspectors. The aim of this study is the development of a wearable gas sensor for the detection of NH3 at room temperature based on the organic semiconductor poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), electrochemically deposited iridium oxide particles, and a hydrogel film. The hydrogel composition was finely optimised to obtain self-healing properties, as well as the desired porosity, adhesion to the substrate, and stability in humidity variations. Its chemical structure and morphology were characterised by infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy, respectively, and were found to play a key role in the transduction process and in the achievement of a reversible and selective response. The sensing properties rely on a potentiometric-like mechanism that significantly differs from most of the state-of-the-art NH3 gas sensors and provides superior robustness to the final device. Thanks to the reliability of the analytical response, the simple two-terminal configuration and the low power consumption, the PEDOT:PSS/IrOx Ps/hydrogel sensor was realised on a flexible plastic foil and successfully tested in a wearable configuration with wireless connectivity to a smartphone. The wearable sensor showed stability to mechanical deformations and good analytical performances, with a sensitivity of 60 ± 8 μA decade-1 in a wide concentration range (17-7899 ppm), which includes the safety limits set by law for NH3 exposure.Entities:
Keywords: PEDOT:PSS; ammonia detection; electrochemical gating; gas sensor; wearable sensor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34883908 PMCID: PMC8659774 DOI: 10.3390/s21237905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Schematic representation of the procedure employed for gas sensor fabrication.
Figure 2SEM images of 0.7%, 1%, and 2% agarose hydrogels.
Figure 3Self-healing properties in a free-standing, 0.7% agarose hydrogel cylinder. From (a–c): pristine hydrogel cylinder, cutting event with separation of the two halves, and reassembly of the two halves. (d) Self-healing waiting phase of the hydrogel. From (e–g): handling of the completely self-healed hydrogel cylinder.
Figure 4(a) Schematic of the optimised two-terminal gas sensor working principle. (b) Current vs. time response of the NH3 sensor and (c) calibration curve (R2 = 0.997) obtained from three repeated measurements. NH3-rich air streams were delivered for 100 s (green shadows) and alternated to air flow until full baseline recovery (blue shadows). Flow rate 2 L min−1; Vapp = −200 mV.
Figure 5(a) Current vs. time response of the NH3 sensor and (b) calibration curve (R2 = 0.999) obtained from three repeated measurements performed without waiting for baseline recovery. NH3-rich air streams were delivered for 100 s and alternated to air flow for 600 s. Flow rate 2 L min−1; Vapp = −200 mV. (c) Sensor response recorded upon exposure to random NH3 concentrations. (d) Sensor response recorded upon exposure to common gaseous compounds.
Figure 6(a) Picture of the flexible two-terminal sensor. (b) Current vs. time response of the flexible NH3 sensor in the straight and bent configurations. (c) Picture of the flexible gas sensor detecting NH3 interfaced with a portable readout electronic system, which was wirelessly connected to a smartphone application via Bluetooth. (d) Real-time response of the flexible sensor in the portable configuration. Inset: calibration curve (R2 = 0.953). (e) Picture of the gas sensor placed in the breast pocket of a lab coat, simulating a real-life use for personal safety.
Summary of flexible NH3 gas sensors performances, based on conducting polymers reported in the literature.
| Sensing Material | Substrate | Connectivity | Range (ppm) | Sensitivity (% ppm−1) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MWCNTs/PANi/PU foam | PDMS | Wired | 5–200 | 0.65 | [ |
| PEDOT: PSS NWs | PET | BT | 0.75–6 | 0.25 | [ |
| PTS/PANi | PET | NFC | 5–200 | 45 | [ |
| PANi/PAN | Textile | Wired | 10–2000 | N/A | [ |
| C-PPy NPs | Plastic | Wired RFID tag | 0.1–25 | 0.2 | [ |
| PEDOT: PSS/Ag NWs | PET | Wired | 0.5–25 | 1.40 | [ |
| PANI/MoS2 | PDMS | Wired | 0.05–30 | N/A | [ |
| PEDOT: PSS/IrOx Ps | PET | BT | 17–7899 | 0.8 | this work |
MWCNTs, multiwalled carbon nanotubes; PU, polyurethane; NWs, nanowires; PTS, p-toluene sulfonate hexahydrate; PAN, polyacrylonitrile; C-PPy, carboxylated Polypyrrole.