| Literature DB >> 34883574 |
Guowei Zhang1, Ling Luo2, Ting Lin3, Boming Zhang1, He Wang1, Yuao Qu4, Bangke Meng5.
Abstract
Aramid fibre-reinforced epoxy composites (AF/EP) are promising materials in the aerospace, transportation, and civil fields owing to their high strength, high modulus, and light weight. Thick composite laminates are gradually being applied to large composite structures such as wind turbine blades. During curing, temperature overheating is a common problem in thick composites, which leads to matrix degradation, thermal residual stresses, and uneven curing. This paper proposes a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) method to optimise the curing cycle of thick AF/EP laminates and reduce the overheating temperature. During curing, the temperature and strain evolution in a thick AF/EP laminate were monitored using fibre Bragg grating sensors. The effects of the curing factors on the overheating temperature of the thick AF/EP laminate were evaluated using the Taguchi method and predicted via the SNR method and analysis of variance. The results indicate that the dwelling temperature is the main factor affecting the overheating temperature. The optimal curing cycle involves an overheating temperature of 192.72 °C, which constitutes an error of 2.58% compared to the SNR method predictions. Additionally, in comparison to the initial curing cycle, the overshoot temperature in the optimised curing cycle was reduced by 58.48 °C, representing a reduction ratio of 23.28%.Entities:
Keywords: aramid fibre/epoxy; composite materials; optimisation; overheating temperature; thick laminate
Year: 2021 PMID: 34883574 PMCID: PMC8658775 DOI: 10.3390/polym13234070
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Working principle of fibre Bragg grating.
Figure 2Resistance strain gauge and FBG sensors.
Figure 3Location of five monitoring points.
Figure 4Two types of FBGs.
Figure 5Distributions of FBGs and thermocouple.
Figure 6Curing monitoring experiment process.
Figure 7New curing cycle.
L16 orthogonal array.
| No. | Factor A | Factor B | Factor C |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 7 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 8 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| 9 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 10 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| 12 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| 13 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| 14 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| 15 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| 16 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
Heating rate, dwelling temperature, and dwelling time of the factors.
| Factors | Levels | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| Heating rate/°C/min | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1 |
| Dwelling temperature/°C | 80 | 90 | 100 | 110 |
| Dwelling time/min | 30 | 60 | 90 | 120 |
Level combinations and experimental values.
| No. | Factors | Experimental Results | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor A | Factor B | Factor C | Overheating Temperature | SNR Value | |
| 1 | 1 (0.25) | 1 (80) | 1 (30) | 206.49 | 46.30 |
| 2 | 1 (0.25) | 2 (90) | 2 (60) | 217.95 | 46.77 |
| 3 | 1 (0.25) | 3 (100) | 3 (90) | 222.36 | 46.94 |
| 4 | 1 (0.25) | 4 (110) | 4 (120) | 222.36 | 46.94 |
| 5 | 2 (0.5) | 1 (80) | 2 (60) | 218.45 | 46.79 |
| 6 | 2 (0.5) | 2 (90) | 1 (30) | 224.75 | 47.03 |
| 7 | 2 (0.5) | 3 (100) | 4 (120) | 244.18 | 47.75 |
| 8 | 2 (0.5) | 4 (110) | 3 (90) | 249.10 | 47.93 |
| 9 | 3 (0.75) | 1 (80) | 3 (90) | 206.47 | 46.30 |
| 10 | 3 (0.75) | 2 (90) | 4 (120) | 232.37 | 47.32 |
| 11 | 3 (0.75) | 3 (100) | 1 (30) | 239.51 | 47.59 |
| 12 | 3 (0.75) | 4 (110) | 2 (60) | 239.53 | 47.59 |
| 13 | 4 (1) | 1 (80) | 4 (120) | 202.93 | 46.15 |
| 14 | 4 (1) | 2 (90) | 3 (90) | 215.63 | 46.67 |
| 15 | 4 (1) | 3 (100) | 2 (60) | 247.21 | 47.86 |
| 16 | 4 (1) | 4 (110) | 1 (30) | 232.56 | 47.33 |
|
| 47.08 | ||||
Figure 8Relationship between strain and wavelength.
Figure 9Relationship between temperature and wavelength.
Figure 10Temperature history of thick AF/EP composites.
Figure 11Comparison of temperatures monitored by FBG and thermocouple.
Figure 12Strain history of thick AF/EP composites.
ANOVA of SNR value.
| Variables | Level-1 | Level-2 | Level-3 | Level-4 | Sum of Squares | Degrees of Freedom | Mean Variance | Contribution | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heating rate |
| 47.38 | 47.20 | 47.00 | 0.9 | 3 | 0.3 | 4.115 | 20.16% |
| Dwelling temperature |
| 46.95 | 47.54 | 47.45 | 3.383 | 3 | 1.128 | 15.464 | 75.78% |
| Dwelling time | 47.06 | 47.25 |
| 47.04 | 0.181 | 3 | 0.06 | 0.828 | 4.06% |
| Total | 4.464 | 100% |
Figure 13Mean SNR values under four levels of three factors.
Figure 14Comparison of experimental and prediction results.