| Literature DB >> 34883333 |
Andrey Zyryanov1, Ekaterina Stupina2, Elizaveta Gordeyeva2, Olga Buivolova3, Evdokiia Novozhilova2, Yulia Akinina2, Oleg Bronov4, Natalia Gronskaya5, Galina Gunenko6, Ekaterina Iskra7, Elena Ivanova8, Anton Kalinovskiy6, Evgenii Kliuev9, Dmitry Kopachev10, Elena Kremneva10, Oksana Kryuchkova11, Igor Medyanik12, Nikita Pedyash13, Viktoria Pozdniakova2, Igor Pronin14, Kristina Rainich2, Andrey Reutov15, Anastasia Samoukina2, Anastasia Shlyakhova2, Andrey Sitnikov16, Olga Soloukhina2, Konstantin Yashin12, Valeriya Zelenkova2, Andrey Zuev13, Maria V Ivanova17, Olga Dragoy18.
Abstract
Unlike stroke, neurosurgical removal of left-hemisphere gliomas acts upon a reorganized language network and involves brain areas rarely damaged by stroke. We addressed whether this causes the profiles of neurosurgery- and stroke-induced language impairments to be distinct. K-means clustering of language assessment data (neurosurgery cohort: N = 88, stroke cohort: N = 95) identified similar profiles in both cohorts. But critically, a cluster of individuals with specific phonological deficits was only evident in the stroke but not in the neurosurgery cohort. Thus, phonological deficits are less clearly distinguished from other language deficits after glioma surgery compared to stroke. Furthermore, the correlations between language production and comprehension scores at different linguistic levels were more extensive in the neurosurgery than in the stroke cohort. Our findings suggest that neurosurgery-induced language impairments do not correspond to those caused by stroke, but rather manifest as a 'moderate global aphasia' - a generalized decline of language processing abilities.Entities:
Keywords: Aphasia; Glioma; K-means clustering; Neurosurgery; Stroke
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34883333 PMCID: PMC8743859 DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Lang ISSN: 0093-934X Impact factor: 2.381