Literature DB >> 34883304

Low fat mass index outperforms handgrip weakness and GLIM-defined malnutrition in predicting cancer survival: Derivation of cutoff values and joint analysis in an observational cohort.

Liangyu Yin1, Chunhua Song2, Jiuwei Cui3, Nanya Wang3, Yang Fan4, Xin Lin4, Ling Zhang4, Mengyuan Zhang4, Chang Wang3, Tingting Liang3, Wei Ji3, Xiangliang Liu3, Wei Li5, Hanping Shi6, Hongxia Xu7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The optimal thresholds to define a survival-related low fat mass index (FMI) in Asian oncology populations remains largely unknown. This study sought to derive the sex-specific FMI cutoffs and analyze the independent and joint associations of a low FMI, handgrip weakness, and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM)-defined malnutrition with cancer survival.
METHODS: We performed a multicenter cohort study including 2376 patients with cancer. The FMI was measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis and the best thresholds were determined using an optimal stratification (OS) method. Low handgrip strength (HGS) and malnutrition were defined based on the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 framework and the GLIM, respectively. The associations of a low FMI, handgrip weakness and malnutrition with survival were estimated independently and jointly by calculating multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs).
RESULTS: The study enrolled 1303 women and 1073 men with a mean age of 57.7 years and a median follow-up of 1267 days. The OS-defined FMI cutoffs were <5 kg/m2 in women and <7.7 kg/m2 in men. A low FMI, low HGS and malnutrition were identified in 1188 (50%), 1106 (46.5%) and 910 (38.3%) patients, respectively. A low FMI was adversely associated with the nutritional status, physical performance, quality of life and hospitalization costs. A low FMI (HR = 1.50, 95%CI = 1.16 to 1.92) and malnutrition (HR = 1.31, 95%CI = 1.08 to 1.59) were independently associated with mortality. Overall, the FMI plus GLIM-defined malnutrition showed the maximal joint prognostic impact, and patients with a combined low FMI and malnutrition had the worst survival (HR = 1.93, 95%CI = 1.48 to 2.52).
CONCLUSIONS: Low FMI-indicated fat depletion outperforms and strengthens the prognostic value of handgrip weakness and GLIM-defined malnutrition for cancer survival. These findings indicate the importance of including fat mass assessment during routine cancer care to help guide strategies to optimize survival outcomes.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Cutoff values; Fat mass index; GLIM; Handgrip strength

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34883304     DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.11.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0261-5614            Impact factor:   7.324


  1 in total

1.  Efficacy of the Nutritional Risk Index, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index, BMI, and GLIM-Defined Malnutrition in Predicting Survival of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Patients Qualified for Home Enteral Nutrition.

Authors:  Zuzanna Przekop; Dorota Szostak-Węgierek; Magdalena Milewska; Mariusz Panczyk; Zuzanna Zaczek; Jacek Sobocki
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.717

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.