| Literature DB >> 34883280 |
Suchira Gallage1, Adnan Ali1, Jose Efren Barragan Avila1, Diran Herebian2, Mohammad M Karimi3, Elaine E Irvine4, Domhnall McHugh4, Anne T Schneider5, Mihael Vucur5, Verena Keitel5, Jesús Gil4, Dominic J Withers4, Tom Luedde5, Mathias Heikenwalder6.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34883280 PMCID: PMC8804272 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.11.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 2352-345X
Figure 1Spontaneous cholemia in C57BL/6 mice upon Western diet feeding. (A) Proposed protocol for screening of cholemic mice. (B) Experimental scheme. (C) Serum TBAs from 6-week-old C57BL/6J Janvier Labs mice. L-TBA (<45 μmol/L) or H-TBA (≥45 μmol/L). (D) Serum TBA before diet feeding. (E) Initial body weight measurement. (F–H) Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), ALP, and cholesterol levels. (I) Body weight development. (J) Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test after 30 weeks of diet. (K and L) Serum ALT and ALP levels. (M) Liver images. (N) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of livers after 30 weeks of diet. (O) Liver to body weight ratio (%). (P) Liver tumor incidence. Chow L-TBA, n = 4 mice; WD L-TBA, n = 5 mice; WD H-TBA, n = 5 mice. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Statistical significance was calculated using either 1-way analysis of variance with the (D-H, J-L– and O) Tukey multiple comparison test or the (P) Fischer exact test. ∗P < .05, ∗∗P < .01, ∗∗∗P < .001, and ∗∗∗∗P < .0001. eMRI, echoMRI; GTT, glucose tolerance test.
Figure 2Cholemic mice show exacerbated biliary damage, liver fibrosis, and up-regulation of proliferative pathways upon Western diet feeding. (A) H&E and collagen IV (COLIV) staining of livers; dashed line indicates the tumor (T) border. Scale bars: 1 mm (low magnification) and 100 μm. (B) Cytokeratin 19 (CK19) and Sirius red staining. Scale bar: 100 μm. (C) Quantification of CK19 and (D) Sirius red–positive area. (E) Serum appearance. (F) Serum total bilirubin (TBIL) levels. (G) Serum TBA profiling. (H and I) Correlation plots. (J) Principal component analysis, (K) gene ontology (GO) analysis, and (L) gene-set enrichment analysis of H-TBA mice compared with L-TBA mice fed a WD. (A–I) Chow L-TBA n = 4; WD L-TBA n = 5; WD H-TBA n = 5 mice. (J–L) WD L-TBA n = 3; WD H-TBA n = 4 mice. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Statistical significance calculated by 1-way analysis of variance with the (C, D, F, and G) Tukey multiple comparison test or (H and I) linear regression. ∗P < .05, ∗∗∗P < .001, ∗∗∗∗P < .0001. FDR, false discovery rate; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NES, normalized enrichment score; NT, non-tumor.