| Literature DB >> 34881370 |
Chikondi Peno1, Edwin P Armitage2, Melanie Clerc1, Carlos Balcazar Lopez1, Ya Jankey Jagne2, Sainabou Drammeh2, Sheikh Jarju2, Hadijatou Sallah2, Elina Senghore2, Benjamin B Lindsey2,3, Janko Camara2, Sulayman Bah2, Nuredin I Mohammed2, David H Dockrell1, Beate Kampmann2,4, Ed Clarke2, Debby Bogaert1,5, Thushan I de Silva2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Influenza and other respiratory viruses promote Streptococcus pneumoniae proliferation in the upper respiratory tract. We sought to investigate for what we believe is the first time, the effect of intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) on nasopharyngeal S pneumoniae density in a low-income to middle-income country population with high pneumococcal carriage rates.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34881370 PMCID: PMC8632704 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00179-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet Microbe ISSN: 2666-5247
Figure 1Trial profile
Overview of participants recruited and retained in the study. Recruitment in 2017 (A). Recruitment in 2018 (B). Children randomly assigned to the LAIV group received one dose of Russian-backbone trivalent LAIV containing either A/17/California/2009/38 in 2017 or A/17/New York/15/5364 in 2018 at day 0. H3N2 strain and influenza B lineages included in the vaccine remained consistent across the 2 years. LAIV=live attenuated influenza vaccine.
Baseline characteristics
| Age, months | 36·4 (28·4–42·4) | 35·1 (27·6–40·3) | |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 116 (55%) | 58 (54%) | |
| Female | 97 (46%) | 50 (46%) | |
| Baseline asymptomatic virus present | 67 (33%) | 41 (39%) | |
| Adenovirus | 3 (4%) | 3 (7%) | |
| Seasonal coronaviruses | 7 (10%) | 3 (7%) | |
| Parainfluenza 1 | 2 (3%) | 4 (10%) | |
| Parainfluenza 1 and seasonal coronaviruses | 1 (1%) | 0 | |
| Parainfluenza 1 and rhinovirus | 1 (1%) | 0 | |
| Parainfluenza 3 | 0 | 1 (2%) | |
| Rhinovirus | 50 (75%) | 25 (61%) | |
| Rhinovirus and adenovirus | 1 (1%) | 3 (7%) | |
| Rhinovirus and seasonal coronaviruses | 1 (1%) | 1 (2%) | |
| Respiratory syncytial virus A | 1 (1%) | 0 | |
| Respiratory syncytial virus B | 0 | 1 (2%) | |
| Presence of smoker in the house | 51 (24%) | 21 (19%) | |
| Outdoor cooking area | 189 (89%) | 97 (90%) | |
| Baseline | 158 (75%) | 81 (75%) | |
Data are median (IQR) or n (%). Percentages might not sum to 100 due to rounding.
205 children in LAIV group and 104 children in control group had day 0 data available for respiratory viral co-infection. These data were not available for eight children in the LAIV group and four children in the control group due to the lack of sample availability for respiratory viral assays. Percentages given for individual or combinations of viruses detected use the total number of children with asymptomatic viruses detected for each group as the denominator.
Cooking inside (under a roof) compared with cooking using an indoor kitchen. Note that 99% of children lived in households where wood or charcoal was the primary fuel used to cook regardless of location of cooking.
Streptococcus pneumoniae detection was done by lytA PCR; S pneumoniae positive samples were defined as having a cycle threshold value of <40 on lytA PCR. For the LAIV group, 211 of 213 day 0 samples were available for testing.
Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage rate and colonisation density during study period
| S pneumoniae | |||
| Day 0 | 158/211 (75%)† | 81/108 (75%) | 1·00 |
| Day 7 | 174/213 (82%) | 83/108 (77%) | 0·38 |
| Day 21 | 180/213 (85%) | 85/108 (79%) | 0·25 |
| Day 0 | 1·17 (0·02–2·08) | 1·21 (0·06–2·08) | 0·73 |
| Day 7 | 1·43 (0·44–2·32) | 1·18 (0·05–2·32) | 0·084 |
| Day 21 | 1·24 (0·34–2·49) | 1·34 (0·16–2·49) | 0·80 |
Data are n (%) or median (IQR).
Comparisons of carriage rates between groups done using the χ2 test. Cross-sectional comparisons of S pneumoniae density between groups at each timepoint were done using the Mann-Whitney U test.
Factors associated with Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage prevalence in the live attenuated influenza vaccine group
| Asymptomatic respiratory virus at day 0 | 2·03 | 0·93–4·43 | 0·076 |
| Day 7 ( | 1·82 | 1·02–3·24 | 0·042 |
| Day 21 ( | 2·44 | 1·34–4·47 | 0·0037 |
| Age, months | 0·96 | 0·92–0·99 | 0·030 |
| Household cooking indoors ( | 0·49 | 0·17–1·45 | 0·20 |
S pneumoniae detection was done by lytA PCR.
p values for factors associated with S pneumoniae carriage prevalence in the live attenuated influenza vaccine group are derived from a generalised logistic mixed-effect model, taking into account changes within individuals over time. Backwards model selection was done as described in the appendix before deciding on variables to include in the optimum model. Reference levels for each variable are given within brackets.
Cooking inside (under a roof) compared with cooking using an indoor kitchen. Note, 99% of children lived in households in which wood or charcoal was the primary fuel used to cook regardless of location of cooking.
Factors associated with S pneumoniae colonisation density in the live attenuated influenza vaccine group
| Asymptomatic respiratory virus at day 0 | +0·287 | 0·122 | 0·020 |
| Day 7 ( | +0·207 | 0·105 | 0·050 |
| Day 21 ( | +0·280 | 0·105 | 0·0082 |
| Recruitment in 2018 ( | −0·059 | 0·116 | 0·61 |
| Age, months | −0·019 | 0·006 | 0·0020 |
| Household cooking indoors ( | −0·290 | 0·185 | 0·12 |
S pneumoniae detection was done by lytA PCR.
p values for factors associated with S pneumoniae density in the live attenuated influenza vaccine group are derived from a generalised linear mixed-effect model, taking into account changes within individuals over time. Backwards model selection was done as described in the appendix before deciding on variables to include in the optimum model. Reference levels for each variable are given within brackets.
Cooking inside (under a roof) compared with cooking using an indoor kitchen. Note, 99% of children lived in households in which wood or charcoal was the primary fuel used to cook regardless of location of cooking.
Figure 2Effect of the presence of asymptomatic respiratory viral infection at baseline on Streptococcus pneumoniae densities during the study period in the LAIV group (A) and the control group (B)
LAIV=live attenuated influenza vaccine.
Figure 3Effect of LAIV viral shedding on Streptococcus pneumoniae densities
Mean densities of S pneumoniae in LAIV recipients stratified by LAIV shedding at (A) day 2 or (B) day 7. High LAIV shedding was defined as a Ct value equal to or lower than the median Ct-value in any of the three LAIV strains at each timepoint. Values above the median Ct value were classified as low LAIV shedding. All individuals with no shedding detected at each timepoint were included in the low shedding group. Note, lower Ct values denote higher amounts of virus. LAIV=live attenuated influenza vaccine. Ct=cycle threshold. *A significant association between high day 7 LAIV shedding and day 7 pneumococcal density seen in generalised linear models (+0·380 log10 copies per μL compared with low LAIV shedding at day 7, p=0·024, appendix p 7), but not between day 2 LAIV shedding and day 7 pneumococcal density (+0·036, p=0·83, appendix p 8).