Selçuk Aytaç1. 1. Plastic Surgery, Private Clinic, Istanbul Turkey.
Abstract
The number of gluteal augmentation procedures with implants has increased in the last years. However, due to high complication rates related to the placement of the implants, surgeons have started to avoid using implants. The objective of the present study was to describe the details of the submuscular gluteal augmentation technique together with lipoplasty techniques and to increase the prevalence of its use. METHODS: All methods are complementary to each other rather than being superior to each other. That is why the author has used submuscular gluteal augmentation with implant technique and lipoplasty together during the surgeries. The complication rates are lower with this easy-to-learn technique described in this article. Eighty-six patients aged 20-46 underwent surgery. The follow-up period was 6-24 months. The implants used consisted of round cohesive silicone, with the most commonly used size being 330 cm3. The average volume of infiltrated fat was 514 cm3. RESULTS: The sciatic nerve is well protected by the surrounding anatomical structures, indicating that submuscular technique can be used safely. Partial wound dehiscence was noted in 1 patient, implant malposition in 5 patients, and seroma in 2 patients. All patients reported that they are highly satisfied with the results of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The author advocates that the combination of lipoplasty with the submuscular technique described is safe, easy to perform, has a short operative time and low complication rates. It can be preferred in buttock beautification as a simple and safe technique.
The number of gluteal augmentation procedures with implants has increased in the last years. However, due to high complication rates related to the placement of the implants, surgeons have started to avoid using implants. The objective of the present study was to describe the details of the submuscular gluteal augmentation technique together with lipoplasty techniques and to increase the prevalence of its use. METHODS: All methods are complementary to each other rather than being superior to each other. That is why the author has used submuscular gluteal augmentation with implant technique and lipoplasty together during the surgeries. The complication rates are lower with this easy-to-learn technique described in this article. Eighty-six patients aged 20-46 underwent surgery. The follow-up period was 6-24 months. The implants used consisted of round cohesive silicone, with the most commonly used size being 330 cm3. The average volume of infiltrated fat was 514 cm3. RESULTS: The sciatic nerve is well protected by the surrounding anatomical structures, indicating that submuscular technique can be used safely. Partial wound dehiscence was noted in 1 patient, implant malposition in 5 patients, and seroma in 2 patients. All patients reported that they are highly satisfied with the results of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The author advocates that the combination of lipoplasty with the submuscular technique described is safe, easy to perform, has a short operative time and low complication rates. It can be preferred in buttock beautification as a simple and safe technique.
Authors: M Mark Mofid; Raul Gonzalez; José Abel de la Peña; Constantino G Mendieta; Douglas M Senderoff; Soheila Jorjani Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.730