| Literature DB >> 34881144 |
Tamer Mettyas1,2, Matthew Barton2,3,4, Muhammad Sana Ullah Sahar5,6, Felicity Lawrence7, Alvaro Sanchez-Herrero8, Megha Shah3, James St John3,4,9, Randy Bindra10,11.
Abstract
Various modalities to facilitate nerve regeneration have been described in the literature with limited success. We hypothesized that negative pressure applied to a sectioned peripheral nerve would enhance nerve regeneration by promoting angiogenesis and axonal lengthening.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34881144 PMCID: PMC8647885 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003568
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ISSN: 2169-7574
Fig. 1.Flow chart showing study design.
Fig. 2.Schematic diagram showing the design of the surgical procedure, red lines represent the 2 ends of the sciatic nerve after transection and insertion into the transverse limb of the T-tube. The longitudinal limb of the T-tube is tunneled subcutaneous to emerge behind the rat’s neck and is attached to the swivel harness system through which the negative pressure is introduced.
Total Rats Included in the Analysis
| Groups | No. Rats |
|---|---|
| Control | 4 |
| Group A (low pressure: 10 mm Hg negative pressure) | 4 |
| Group B (medium pressure: 20/30 mm Hg negative pressure) | 7 |
| Group C (high pressure: 50/70 mm Hg negative pressure) | 7 |
| Totals rats included in results/analysis | 22 |
Measurement of the Length of Proximal Nerve End Inside the T-tube (in Millimeters)
| Rat Groups | Length of Nerve Stump at the Day of Surgery—Day 0 (Li)* | Length of Nerve Stump at the day of retrieval —Day 7 (Lf)* | Lf – Li Apparent Increase in Nerve Lengths* | Median, IQR (Q3-Q1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 3.8 ± 0.8 | 4.4 ± 1.4 | 0.6 ± 0.15 | 0.6, 0.3 |
| Group A | 3.75 ± 1.2 | 7.95 ± 2 | 4.2 ± 0.91 | 3.9, 1.175 |
| Group B | 4.7 ± 2.3 | 7.2 ± 1.5 | 2.5 ± 0.25 | 2.45, 0.45 |
| Group C | 4.1 ± 0.9 | 6.3 ± 1.1 | 2.2 ± 0.33 | 2.25, 0.725 |
*Measurements in millimeters (Mean ± SD) of proximal nerve end.
Fig. 3.Schematic diagram showing the 3 zones of the proximal nerve end inside the tube.
Fig. 5.Length of nerve zones.
Fig. 6.True nerve growth in millimeters (group A was statistically significant **P < 0.01).
Fig. 7.A, Counting blood vessels in Zone 2. B, Quantity of blood vessels in each group. Group A was statistically significant when compared to the control (**P < 0.01).
Possible Effects of Controlled Negative Pressure on Neurogenesis
| Direct Effects | Indirect Effects |
|---|---|
| Draw more fluid from neighboring blood vessels in the nerve’s epineurium to support growing neurites of axons at the proximal stump. | Faster regrowth rate of regenerating axons |
| Direct the growing neurites in a confined tube and guide them toward the distal end. | Mitigate the risk of aberrant axonal sprouting |
| Macro-deformation stretching nerve fibers (axon elongation), unidirectionally to increase the nerve regrowth rate. | Allows a lengthening (true growth) of the native nerve |