Literature DB >> 34880429

A constraint on historic growth in global photosynthesis due to increasing CO2.

T F Keenan1,2, X Luo3,4,5, M G De Kauwe6,7,8, B E Medlyn9, I C Prentice10,11,12, B D Stocker13,14, N G Smith15, C Terrer16,17, H Wang12, Y Zhang3,4,18, S Zhou3,4,19,20,21,22.   

Abstract

The global terrestrial carbon sink is increasing1-3, offsetting roughly a third of anthropogenic CO2 released into the atmosphere each decade1, and thus serving to slow4 the growth of atmospheric CO2. It has been suggested that a CO2-induced long-term increase in global photosynthesis, a process known as CO2 fertilization, is responsible for a large proportion of the current terrestrial carbon sink4-7. The estimated magnitude of the historic increase in photosynthesis as result of increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations, however, differs by an order of magnitude between long-term proxies and terrestrial biosphere models7-13. Here we quantify the historic effect of CO2 on global photosynthesis by identifying an emergent constraint14-16 that combines terrestrial biosphere models with global carbon budget estimates. Our analysis suggests that CO2 fertilization increased global annual photosynthesis by 11.85 ± 1.4%, or 13.98 ± 1.63 petagrams carbon (mean ± 95% confidence interval) between 1981 and 2020. Our results help resolve conflicting estimates of the historic sensitivity of global photosynthesis to CO2, and highlight the large impact anthropogenic emissions have had on ecosystems worldwide.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34880429     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04096-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  27 in total

1.  Detecting long-term metabolic shifts using isotopomers: CO2-driven suppression of photorespiration in C3 plants over the 20th century.

Authors:  Ina Ehlers; Angela Augusti; Tatiana R Betson; Mats B Nilsson; John D Marshall; Jürgen Schleucher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle.

Authors:  David Schimel; Britton B Stephens; Joshua B Fisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Evaluating and comparing remote sensing terrestrial GPP models for their response to climate variability and CO2 trends.

Authors:  Zhongyi Sun; Xiufeng Wang; Xirui Zhang; Hiroshi Tani; Enliang Guo; Shuai Yin; Tianyou Zhang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 4.  Robust Response of Terrestrial Plants to Rising CO2.

Authors:  Lucas A Cernusak; Vanessa Haverd; Oliver Brendel; Didier Le Thiec; Jean-Marc Guehl; Matthias Cuntz
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 18.313

5.  What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Stephen P Long
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Projected land photosynthesis constrained by changes in the seasonal cycle of atmospheric CO2.

Authors:  Sabrina Wenzel; Peter M Cox; Veronika Eyring; Pierre Friedlingstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Large historical growth in global terrestrial gross primary production.

Authors:  J E Campbell; J A Berry; U Seibt; S J Smith; S A Montzka; T Launois; S Belviso; L Bopp; M Laine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Increase in observed net carbon dioxide uptake by land and oceans during the past 50 years.

Authors:  A P Ballantyne; C B Alden; J B Miller; P P Tans; J W C White
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Recent pause in the growth rate of atmospheric CO2 due to enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake.

Authors:  Trevor F Keenan; I Colin Prentice; Josep G Canadell; Christopher A Williams; Han Wang; Michael Raupach; G James Collatz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions.

Authors:  D N Huntzinger; A M Michalak; C Schwalm; P Ciais; A W King; Y Fang; K Schaefer; Y Wei; R B Cook; J B Fisher; D Hayes; M Huang; A Ito; A K Jain; H Lei; C Lu; F Maignan; J Mao; N Parazoo; S Peng; B Poulter; D Ricciuto; X Shi; H Tian; W Wang; N Zeng; F Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  5 in total

1.  The role of China's terrestrial carbon sequestration 2010-2060 in offsetting energy-related CO2 emissions.

Authors:  Yao Huang; Wenjuan Sun; Zhangcai Qin; Wen Zhang; Yongqiang Yu; Tingting Li; Qing Zhang; Guocheng Wang; Lingfei Yu; Yijie Wang; Fan Ding; Ping Zhang
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 23.178

2.  Constraints on estimating the CO2 fertilization effect emerge.

Authors:  Chris Huntingford; Rebecca J Oliver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 69.504

3.  Field-based tree mortality constraint reduces estimates of model-projected forest carbon sinks.

Authors:  Kailiang Yu; Philippe Ciais; Sonia I Seneviratne; Zhihua Liu; Han Y H Chen; Jonathan Barichivich; Craig D Allen; Hui Yang; Yuanyuan Huang; Ashley P Ballantyne
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Increasing sensitivity of dryland vegetation greenness to precipitation due to rising atmospheric CO2.

Authors:  Yao Zhang; Pierre Gentine; Xiangzhong Luo; Xu Lian; Yanlan Liu; Sha Zhou; Anna M Michalak; Wu Sun; Joshua B Fisher; Shilong Piao; Trevor F Keenan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 17.694

5.  Assessment of climate change effects on vegetation and river hydrology in a semi-arid river basin.

Authors:  Jamal Hassan Ougahi; Mark E J Cutler; Simon J Cook
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.