| Literature DB >> 34880342 |
Ajmal Khan1, Azhar Hussain Shah2, Niaz Ali1.
Abstract
Efficient protocols for callus induction and micro propagation of Saussurea costus (Falc.) Lipsch were developed and phytochemical diversity of wild and in-vitro propagated material was investigated. Brown and red compact callus was formed with frequency of 80-95%, 78-90%, 70-95% and 65-80% from seeds, leaf, petiole and root explants, respectively. MS media supplemented with BAP (2.0 mgL-1), NAA (1.0 mgL-1) and GA3 (0.25 mgL-1) best suited for multiple shoot buds initiation (82%), while maximum shoot length was formed on media with BAP (1.5 mgL-1), NAA (0.25 mgL-1) and Kinetin (0.5 mgL-1). Full strength media with IAA (0.5 mgL-1) along with IBA (0.5 mgL-1) resulted in early roots initiation. Similarly, maximum rooting (87.57%) and lateral roots formation (up to 6.76) was recorded on full strength media supplemented with BAP (0.5 mgL-1), IAA (0.5 mgL-1) and IBA (0.5 mgL-1). Survival rate of acclimatized plantlets in autoclaved garden soil, farmyard soil, and sand (2:1:1) was 87%. Phytochemical analysis revealed variations in biochemical contents i.e. maximum sugar (808.32 µM/ml), proline (48.14 mg/g), ascorbic acid (373.801 mM/g) and phenolic compounds (642.72 mgL-1) were recorded from callus cultured on different stress media. Nonetheless, highest flavenoids (59.892 mg/g) and anthocyanin contents (32.39 mg/kg) were observed in in-vitro propagated plants. GC-MS analysis of the callus ethyl acetate extracts revealed 24 different phytochemicals. The variability in secondary metabolites of both wild and propagated plants/callus is reported for the first time for this species. This study may provide a baseline for the conservation and sustainable utilization of S. costus with implications for isolation of unique and pharmacologically active compounds from callus or regenerated plantlets.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34880342 PMCID: PMC8654858 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03032-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Different stress for phytochemical comparison of callus grown on simple callus promoting media (CPM) supplemented with Kinetin (0.5 mgL-1) and 2.4-D (1.0 mgL-1) and callus subjected to various stresses i.e. 60 gL-1 D-Sorbitol stress (CPM-1), 60 gL-1 D-Manitol (CPM-2), 5 gL-1 Poly ethylene glycol 600 (CPM-3) and 60 gL-1 Sucrose (CPM-4).
| Samples | Kinetin (mgL-1) | 2,4-D (mgL-1) | Callus stress |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPM | 0.5 | 1.0 | |
| CPM-1 | 0.5 | 1.0 | D-Sorbitol (60 gL-1) |
| CPM-2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | D-Manitol (60 gL-1) |
| CPM-3 | 0.5 | 1.0 | Poly ethylene glycol 600 (5 gL-1) |
| CPM-4 | 0.5 | 1.0 | Sucrose (60 gL-1) |
In-vitro callus induction and callus growth after 30 days of culturing of S. costus using seed, leaf, petiole and root as an explants.
| Treatments | Conc. 2,4-D/Kinetin mgL-1 | Type of explants used | Means days to callus induction (x- ± SE) | Callus growth after 30 days (x- ± SE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 0.25/0.5 | Seeds | 14.00 ± 1.09A | 0.22 ± 0.07D |
| Leaf | 15.20 ± 0.73C | 1.50 ± 0.08AB | ||
| Petiole | 15.80 ± 0.73[ | 0.91 ± 0.02D | ||
| Root | 16.40 ± 0.97A | 0.91 ± 0.05BC | ||
| T2 | 0.5/0.5 | Seeds | 17.60 ± 0.67A | 1.39 ± 0.06CD |
| Leaf | 17.20 ± 0.37C | 1.34 ± 0.04AB | ||
| Petiole | 17.80 ± 0.37AB | 1.27 ± 0.08BC | ||
| Root | 19.20 ± 0.37AB | 0.92 ± 0.02B | ||
| T3 | 0.5/1.0 | Seeds | 13.40 ± 0.60A | 1.86 ± 0.06A |
| Leaf | 15.80 ± 1.07C | 1.65 ± 0.06A | ||
| Petiole | 15.60 ± 0.50C | 1.42 ± 0.05A | ||
| Root | 17.40 ± 0.86BC | 1.114 ± 0.07A | ||
| T4 | 0.5/1.5 | Seeds | 16.60 ± 0.60A | 1.62 ± 0.05B |
| Leaf | 18.60 ± 1.07AB | 1.32 ± 0.08AB | ||
| Petiole | 18.60 ± 0.50A | 1.33 ± 0.02AB | ||
| Root | 17.20 ± 0.86BC | 0.75 ± 0.08C | ||
| T5 | 0.5/2.0 | Seeds | 17.40 ± 1.07A | 1.54 ± 0.08BC |
| Leaf | 18.20 ± 0.66AB | 1.23 ± 0.06BC | ||
| Petiole | 18.40 ± 0.50A | 1.26 ± 0.03BC | ||
| Root | 19.40 ± 0.74AB | 0.90 ± 0.01BC | ||
| T6 | 1.0/2.0 | Seeds | 18.20 ± 0.80A | 1.65 ± 0.06B |
| Leaf | 19.60 ± 0.81A | 0.92 ± 0.20C | ||
| Petiole | 19.01 ± 0.89A | 1.18 ± 0.06C | ||
| Root | 20.80 ± 0.73A | 0.84 ± 0.03BC |
The effect of different concentrations of IAA and IBA along with BAP on roots initiation, number of roots and total root length of S. costus. Each value represents mean ± SE of five replicates.
| Treatment | BAP (mgL-1) | IAA (mgL-1) | IBA (mgL-1) | Days to root initation (mean ± SE) | Number of roots (mean ± SE) | Total root length (cm) (mean ± SE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T16 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0 | 18.80 ± 1.01A | 3.84 ± 0.508B | 1.50 ± 0.19B |
| T17 | 0.5 | 0 | 1.0 | 16.20 ± 0.80AB | 5.32 ± 0.531AB | 2.53 ± 0.21A |
| T18 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 13.80 ± 0.91B | 6.76 ± 0.733A | 2.27 ± 0.24A |
Figure 1In-vitro callus induction of S. costus using seeds (A, B, C), leaf (D, E), roots (F) and nodes (G) as an explant.
Figure 2In-vitro Propagation of S. costus using nodal explant (A) Auxiliary buds, (B) Shoot buds initiation, (C) Multiple shoot initiation, (D, E, F) Mature plantlets, (E, F) Roots initiation, (G, H) Acclimatization of plants.
Influence of different plant growth regulators on buds initiation and Range analysis. Vigorous and green buds (+ + +); healthy buds (+ +); weak bud ( +). Each Value represents the mean ± SE of five replicates. Significant deference at P ≤ 0.05, x- ± Sd- average ± Standard deviation, x ± SE – average ± Standard error.
| Treatment | BAP mgL-1) | NAA mgL-1 | GA3 mgL-1 | Bud induction rate (x- ± SE) | Time to bud initiation | Growth state of bud |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T7 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 19.40 ± 1.50A | 19 Days | + |
| T8 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0 | 17.80 ± 1.02AB | 18 Days | + + |
| T9 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.25 | 17.60 ± 0.37AB | 18 Days | + + + |
| T10 | 1.0 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 17.00 ± 0.44AB | 17 Days | + + + |
| T11 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.25 | 15.60 ± 0.87B | 15 Days | + + + |
| T12 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 16.40 ± 0.67B | 16 Days | + + + |
The influence of different concentrations of plant growth regulators on bud proliferation of S. costus. vigorous and green buds (+ + +); healthy buds (+ +); weak buds ( +). Each value represents the mean ± SE of five replicates.
| Treatments | BAP (mgL-1) | NAA (mgL-1) | Kinetin (mgL-1) | shoots numbers per plant (≧0.5 cm) (mean ± SE) | shoots numbers per plant (≧0.5 cm) (mean ± SE) | Total shoot length (≧0.5 cm) (mean ± SE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T13 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0 | 2.20 ± 0.44 | 2.20 ± 0.20B | 2.19 ± 0.26B |
| T14 | 1.0 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 4.00 ± 0.70 | 4.00 ± 0.31A | 2.50 ± 0.30AB |
| T15 | 1.5 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 2.80 ± 0.83 | 2.80 ± 0.37B | 3.11 ± 0.33A |
Figure 3Variation in the Total Sugar contents (A) and proline contents (B) of S. costus collected from wild, in-vitro propagated plant and induced callus. Different stress for phytochemical comparison of callus grown on simple callus promoting media (CPM) supplemented with Kinetin (0.5 mgL-1) and 2.4-D (1.0 mgL-1) and callus subjected to various stresses i.e. 60 gL-1 D-Sorbitol stress (CPM-1), 60 gL-1 D-Manitol (CPM-2), 5 gL-1 Poly ethylene glycol 600 (CPM-3) and 60 gL-1 Sucrose (CPM-4).
Figure 4Variation in the Total Flavenoids (A) and Ascorbic acid (B) contents of S. costus collected from wild, micro propagated plant and induced callus grown on simple callus promoting media (CPM) supplemented with Kinetin (0.5 mgL-1) and 2.4-D (1.0 mgL-1) and callus subjected to various stresses i.e. 60 gL-1 D-Sorbitol stress (CPM-1), 60 gL-1 D-Manitol (CPM-2), 5 gL-1 Poly ethylene glycol 600 (CPM-3) and 60 gL-1 Sucrose (CPM-4).
Figure 5Variation in the Total Phenolics (A) and Anthocyanin (B) of S. costus collected from wild, micro propagated plant and induced callus. Different stresses for phytochemical comparison of callus grown on simple callus promoting media (CPM) supplemented with Kinetin (0.5 mgL-1) and 2.4-D (1.0 mgL-1) and callus subjected to various stresses i.e. 60 gL-1 D-Sorbitol stress (CPM-1), 60 gL-1 D-Manitol (CPM-2), 5 gL-1 Poly ethylene glycol 600 (CPM-3) and 60 gL-1 Sucrose (CPM-4).
Phytocomponents identified in ethyl acetate extract of S. costus callus grown on simple callus promoting media (Kinetin: 0.5mgL-1 and 2.4-D: 1.0 mgL-1) and callus subjected to various stresses i.e. 60gL-1 D-Sorbitol stress (CPM-1), 60gL-1 D-Manitol (CPM-2), 5gL-1 Poly ethylene glycol 600 (CPM-3) and 60gL-1 Sucrose (CPM-4).
| RT | Compound name | Molecular mass | Cas number | CPM | CPM-1 | CPM-2 | CPM-3 | CPM-4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % area | % area | % area | % area | % area | ||||
| 10.13 | Dodecane,2,6,10-trimethyl | 212 | 3891–98-3 | 1.35 | 3.045 | 1.97 | ||
| 13.04 | Hexadecane | 226 | 544–76-3 | 2.48 | 5.92 | 4.57 | 3.73 | |
| 14.23 | Bezene,1,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl) | 190 | 1012–72-2 | 8.67 | 5.31 | 5.17 | ||
| 14.41 | Benzene, 1,3bis(dimethylethyl) | 190 | 1014–60-4 | 2.26 | ||||
| 14.92 | Nonadecane,2,6,10,14 tetramethyl | 324 | 55,124–80-6 | 7.55 | 4.31 | |||
| 14.98 | Octacosane,1-Iodo | 520 | 900,406–32-2 | 12.34 | ||||
| 15.24 | Octadecane-2,6,10,14-tetramethyl | 310 | 54,964–82-8 | 4.08 | 6.85 | 12.34 | 3.20 | 9.40 |
| 16.64 | Hentriacontane | 436 | 630–04-6 | 3.66 | 7.68 | 7.47 | 1.89 | 3.87 |
| 18.4 | Heptadecane,2,6,10,15-Tetramethyl | 296 | 54,833–54-6 | 7.90 | 5.38 | |||
| 18.31 | Tritetracontane | 604 | 7098–21-7 | 5.46 | ||||
| 18.32 | Dodecane,1-fluoro | 188 | 334–68-9 | 9.89 | ||||
| 19.13 | Carbonic acid,decyl undecyl ester | 356 | 900,383–16-0 | 3.11 | ||||
| 20.7 | 6-tetradecanesulfonicacid,butyl ester | 334 | 20,028,280–27-4 | 10.30 | 10.62 | |||
| 21.6 | Nonadecane,2,6,10,14,18-pentamethyl | 338 | 55,191–61-2 | 13.39 | 12.76 | 10.47 | 18.60 | |
| 21.7 | Nonadecane,2,6,10,14 -tetramethyl | 324 | 55,124–80-6 | 22.43 | 16.90 | 14.28 | ||
| 21.9 | Eicosane,2,6,10,14,18-pentamethyl | 352 | 51,794–16-2 | 13.39 | 16.01 | |||
| 23.67 | Heneisane | 296 | 629–94-7 | 4.28 | 7.04 | 12.89 | ||
| 24.65 | Propanic acid,2-methyl-,3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadienyl ester | 224 | 2345–24-6 | 64.24 | ||||
| 25.24 | Alpha-maaliene | 204 | 489–28-1 | 9.31 | ||||
| 25.59 | Dotriacontane | 450 | 544,854 | 12.29 | ||||
| 26.4 | Tetrapentacotane | 758 | 5856–66-6 | 7.795 | 14.37 | 5.92 | ||
| 27.52 | Dotricotane | 450 | 544,854 | 5.84 | ||||
| 27.73 | Triacotane | 422 | 638–68-6 | 10.11 | 7.04 | |||
| 28.7 | Selina-3,7(11)-diene | 204 | 6813–21-4 | 18.81 | ||||
| Total identification | 100 | 99.99 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Figure 6GC–MS Chromatogram of ethyl acetate extracts of callus grown on simple callus promoting media (CPM) supplemented with Kinetin (0.5 mgL-1) and 2.4-D (1.0 mgL-1).
Figure 7GC–MS Chromatogram of ethyl acetate extracts of callus subjected to 60 gL-1 D-Sorbitol stress (CPM-1).