| Literature DB >> 34880023 |
Wallelign Aleminew1, Bezawit Mulat2, Kegnie Shitu1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the magnitude and associated factors of obstetric fistula (OF) awareness among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: maternal medicine; public health; reproductive medicine; sexual and gender disorders; urogynaecology
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34880023 PMCID: PMC8655562 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Sociodemographic and sexual characteristics of the reproductive age women in Ethiopia (n=15 683)
| Variables | Frequency | Proportion |
| Age | ||
| 15–19 | 3381 | 21.6 |
| 20–25 | 3655 | 23.3 |
| 26–30 | 2882 | 18.4 |
| ≥31 | 5765 | 36.7 |
| Religion | ||
| Christian | 10 580 | 67.4 |
| Muslim | 4893 | 31.1 |
| Others | 205 | 1.3 |
| Highest educational level | ||
| No-formal education | 7498 | 47.8 |
| Primary | 5490 | 35 |
| Secondary | 1818 | 11.6 |
| Higher | 877 | 5.6 |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 10 014 | 63.8 |
| Unmarried | 5669 | 36.2 |
| Ever had a child | ||
| No | 5096 | 32.5 |
| Yes | 10 587 | 67.5 |
| Sexual experience | ||
| Never had sex | 3650 | 23.3 |
| Ever had sex | 12 033 | 76.7 |
| Currently pregnant | ||
| No or unsure | 14 548 | 92.8 |
| Yes | 1135 | 7.2 |
| Ever had a terminated pregnancy | ||
| No | 14 447 | 92.1 |
| Yes | 1236 | 7.9 |
| Mass media exposure (TV/radio) | ||
| Both less than a week or not at all | 11 702 | 74.6 |
| Either at least once a week | 2896 | 18.5 |
| Both at least once a week | 1085 | 6.9 |
| Use of internet | ||
| Never | 14 904 | 95.0 |
| Ever | 693 | 4.4 |
| Currently working | ||
| No | 10 463 | 66.7 |
| Yes | 5220 | 33.3 |
| Household Wealth Index | ||
| Poor | 8420 | 53.7 |
| Medium | 3100 | 19.8 |
| Rich | 4164 | 26.5 |
TV, television.
Community-level factors of women’s awareness of obstetric fistula in Ethiopia (n=15 683)
| Variables | Frequency | Proportion |
| Residence | ||
| Urban | 3476 | 22.2 |
| Rural | 12 207 | 77.8 |
| Contextual region | ||
| Agrarian | 13 870 | 88.5 |
| Pastoral | 792 | 5.0 |
| Metropolitan | 1021 | 6.5 |
| Community poverty | ||
| Low | 7969 | 49.2 |
| High | 7714 | 50.8 |
| Community female education | ||
| Low | 9452 | 60.3 |
| High | 6231 | 39.7 |
| Community media exposure | ||
| Low | 9089 | 58.0 |
| High | 6594 | 42.0 |
| Community ANC utilisation rate | ||
| Low | 9848 | 62.8 |
| High | 5835 | 37.2 |
| Distance to health facility is a big problem | ||
| Low | 6656 | 42.4 |
| High | 9027 | 57.6 |
ANC, antenatal care.
Random effect model and model fitness for factors associated with women’s awareness of obstetric fistula in Ethiopia (n=15 683)
| Measure of variation | Model 1(null) | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 |
| Community level variations (SE) | 1.84 (0.18) | 0.85 (0.07) | 0.69 (.06) | 0.68 (0.06) |
| Intraclass correlation coefficient | 0.360 | 0.211 | 0.174 | 0.171 |
| Median OR | 3.63 (3.32, 3.97) | 2.40 (2.24, 2.58) | 2.20 (2.07, 2.35) | 2.19 (2.06, 2.34) |
| Proportional change of variance | Reference | 0.414 | 0.516 | 0.52 |
| Model fitness | ||||
| Deviance | 18 290.62 | 16 908.39 | 17 801.16 | 16 775.54 |
A multilevel logistic regression analysis of factors associated with women’s awareness of obstetric fistula among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia (n=15 683)
| Variables | Model II | Model III | Model IV |
| Age | |||
| 15–19 | 1 | 1 | |
| 20–25 | 1.20 (1.04 to 1.38)* | 1.17 (1.02 to 1.35)* | |
| 26–30 | 1.57 (1.33 to 1.85)† | 1.50 (1.27 to 1.76)† | |
| >30 | 1.87 (1.59 to 2.20)† | 1.76 (1.50 to 2.07)† | |
| Religion | |||
| Christians | 1 | 1 | |
| Muslim | 0.77 (0.67 to 0.87)† | 0.83 (0.73 to 0.94)† | |
| Education | |||
| No formal education | 1 | 1 | |
| Primary | 1.79 (1.61 to 1.99)† | 1.70 (1.53 to 1.89)† | |
| Secondary | 3.77 (3.25 to 4.38)† | 3.43 (2.95 to 3.99)† | |
| Higher | 6.50 (5.16 to 8.18)† | 5.88 (4.66 to 7.42)† | |
| History of birth | |||
| No | 1 | 1 | |
| Yes | 1.11 (0.96 to 1.29) | 1.14 (0.98 to 1.33) | |
| Sex history | |||
| No | 1 | 1 | |
| Yes | 1.15 (0.98 to 1.35) | 1.16 (0.99 to 1.35) | |
| Ever terminated pregnancy | |||
| No | 1 | 1 | |
| Yes | 1.31 (1.13 to 1.52)† | 1.31 (1.13 to 1.51)† | |
| Media exposure | |||
| Less than a week/never | 1 | 1 | |
| At least once a week | 1.46 (1.31 to 1.62)† | 1.33 (1.2 to 1.49)† | |
| Internet use | |||
| Never | 1 | 1 | |
| Ever | 2.43 (1.99 to 2.96)† | 2.25 (1.84 to 2.75)† | |
| Currently working | |||
| No | |||
| Yes | 1.12 (1.03 to 1.23)* | 1.10 (0.9 to 1.19) | |
| Household Wealth Index | |||
| Poor | 1 | 1 | |
| Medium | 1.27 (1.11 to 1.45)† | 1.17 (1.02 to 1.34)* | |
| Rich | 1.92 (1.69 to 2.17)† | 1.50 (1.31 to 1.72)† | |
| Residence | |||
| Rural | 1 | 1 | |
| Urban | 1.62 (1.23 to 2.15)† | 1.11 (0.84 to 1.48) | |
| Contextual region | |||
| Pastorals | 1 | 1 | |
| Agrarians | 1.28 (1.07 to 1.53)* | 1.09 (0.91 to 1.31) | |
| Metropolitans | 1.29 (0.99 to 1.70) | 0.97 (0.74 to 1.28) | |
| Community-level poverty | |||
| High | 1 | 1 | |
| low poverty | 1.17 (0.94 to 1.46) | 0.93 (0.74 to 1.16) | |
| Community female education | |||
| Low | 1 | 1 | |
| High | 1.57 (1.27 to 1.93)† | 1.09 (0.88 to 1.34) | |
| Community media exposure | |||
| Low | 1 | 1 | |
| High | 1.49 (1.21 to 1.84)† | 1.30 (1.05 to 1.61)* | |
| Community ANC rate | |||
| Low | 1 | 1 | |
| High | 1.81 (1.49 to 2.20)† | 1.66 (1.37 to 2.02)† | |
| Health facility distance problem | |||
| High | 1 | 1 | |
| Low | 1.55 (1.28 to 1.88)† | 1.49 (1.23 to 1.81)† | |
*Statistically significant at p<0.05.
†Statistically significant at p<0.01, model II=a model contained only individual-level factors, model III=a model contained only community-level factors, model IV=a model contained both the individual and community level factors.
ANC, antenatal care; AOR, adjusted OR.