Literature DB >> 3487935

MRI of the normal pericardium.

U Sechtem, D Tscholakoff, C B Higgins.   

Abstract

The visibility and thickness of the pericardium, as depicted by MRI, and the changes of these parameters over the cardiac cycle were determined in 18 normal subjects. Gated, cycled, multisection images were obtained in the transaxial orientation. Using a score-point system for quantification, there was better visualization of the low-intensity pericardial line during systole as compared with diastole (p less than 0.005). Pericardial thickness was 1.2 +/- 0.5 mm in diastole and 1.7 +/- 0.5 mm in systole (p less than 0.001) as measured in a midventricular section in front of the right ventricle; both values exceeded the thickness of 0.4 to 1.0 mm reported for anatomic measurements of pericardial thickness. The layer of normal pericardial fluid present in the pericardial space should also have low intensity, and it likely contributes to the overall pericardial thickness as visualized by MRI. Since MRI is sensitive to the small amount of normal pericardial fluid and depicts its anatomic distribution, it should be valuable in detection and quantification of even small pericardial effusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3487935     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.147.2.239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  19 in total

1.  New black blood pulse sequence for studies of the heart.

Authors:  S Campos; V Martinez Sanjuan; J J Garcia Nieto; V Belloch; A Lucas; M J Masip; P Nogues; J C Martinez; G Zannoli; H Lejay; J Celma
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-04

Review 2.  Case presentation and review: constrictive pericarditis.

Authors:  L Osterberg; R Vagelos; J E Atwood
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-10

Review 3.  MR, CT, and PET imaging in pericardial disease.

Authors:  Peter Alter; Jens H Figiel; Thomas P Rupp; Georg F Bachmann; Bernhard Maisch; Marga B Rominger
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  MR imaging findings in 76 consecutive surgically proven cases of pericardial disease with CT and pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Phillip M Young; James F Glockner; Eric E Williamson; Michael F Morris; Philip A Araoz; Paul R Julsrud; Hartzell V Schaff; William D Edwards; Jae K Oh; Jerome F Breen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Imaging of Cardiovascular Disease in Pregnancy and the Peripartum Period.

Authors:  Theodore Pierce; Meline Hovnanian; Sandeep Hedgire; Brian Ghoshhajra
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-11-14

6.  Total absence of the pericardium incidentally found during surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax.

Authors:  Ato Sugiyama; Yotaro Izumi; Yoshiaki Inoue; Kohei Aoki; Hiroki Fukuda; Masatoshi Gika; Mitsuo Nakayama
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-10-04

7.  Delayed contrast enhancement in a patient with perimyocarditis on contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI: case report.

Authors:  Kunihiko Teraoka; Masaharu Hirano; Minoru Yannbe; Yuka Ohtaki; Toyoyuki Ohkubo; Kimihiko Abe; Akira Yamashina
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Assessment of the thickness of the right ventricular free wall by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  J Suzuki; T Sakamoto; K Takenaka; K Kawakubo; K Amano; H Takahashi; I Hasegawa; T Shiota; Y Hada; T Sugimoto
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-11

Review 9.  Recent role of imaging in the diagnosis of pericardial disease.

Authors:  Darshak H Karia; Yan-Qiu Xing; Jeffrey T Kuvin; H Joachim Nesser; Natesa G Pandian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pericardial diseases.

Authors:  Jan Bogaert; Marco Francone
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.