| Literature DB >> 34879066 |
Obasanjo Afolabi Bolarinwa1,2, Zemenu Tadesse Tessema3, James Boadu Frimpong4, Abdul-Aziz Seidu5,6, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that in countries with high fertility and fecundity rates, such as Nigeria, the promotion of modern contraceptive use prevents approximately 32% and 10% of maternal and child mortality, respectively. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the spatial distribution of modern contraceptive use and its predictors among women of reproductive age in Nigeria.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34879066 PMCID: PMC8654187 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258844
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Individual and household/community level characteristics of reproductive age women in Nigeria (n = 24,281).
| Variable | Weighted Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Individual level | ||
|
| ||
| 15–24 | 5,868 | 24.17 |
| 25–34 | 9,598 | 39.53 |
| 35 & above | 8,815 | 36.30 |
|
| ||
| No Education | 10,872 | 44.78 |
| Primary | 3,466 | 14.27 |
| Secondary & above | 9,943 | 40.95 |
|
| ||
| Never married | 1,212 | 4.99 |
| Married | 22,103 | 91.03 |
| Cohabitating | 666 | 2.74 |
| Separated/divorced/widowed | 299 | 1.23 |
|
| ||
| Christianity | 9,395 | 38.69 |
| Islam | 14,766 | 60.81 |
| Traditionalist & others | 120 | 0.49 |
|
| ||
| Not working | 7,355 | 30.29 |
| Working | 16,925 | 69.71 |
|
| ||
| Hausa | 10,647 | 43.85 |
| Yoruba | 3,243 | 13.36 |
| Igbo | 2,790 | 11.49 |
| Others | 7,600 | 31.30 |
|
| ||
| 0 | 3,051 | 12.56 |
| 1–3 | 11,122 | 45.81 |
| 4 & above | 10,108 | 41.63 |
|
| ||
| No | 8,813 | 36.30 |
| Yes | 15,467 | 63.70 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Urban | 9,751 | 40.16 |
| Rural | 14,529 | 59.84 |
|
| ||
| Poorest | 5,047 | 20.79 |
| Poorer | 5,190 | 21.38 |
| Middle | 4,540 | 18.70 |
| Richer | 4,672 | 19.24 |
| Richest | 4,830 | 19.89 |
|
| ||
| North Central | 3,097 | 12.76 |
| North East | 4,345 | 17.89 |
| North West | 8,612 | 35.47 |
| South East | 1,978 | 8.15 |
| South South | 2,490 | 10.26 |
| South West | 3,759 | 15.48 |
|
| ||
| Male | 22,385 | 92.19 |
| Female | 1,896 | 7.81 |
|
| ||
| Low | 7,685 | 31.65 |
| Medium | 16,596 | 68.35 |
|
| ||
| Low | 8,053 | 33.17 |
| Medium | 7,736 | 31.86 |
| High | 8,491 | 34.97 |
|
| ||
| Low | 13,342 | 54.95 |
| Medium | 2,238 | 9.22 |
| High | 8,701 | 35.84 |
Fig 1Spatial distribution of modern contraceptive use in Nigeria, 2018.
Fig 2Spatial autocorrelation of modern contractive use in Nigeria, 2018.
Fig 3Hotspot analysis of modern contraceptive use in Nigeria, 2018.
Fig 4The prediction of modern contraceptive use in Nigeria, 2018.
Multilevel logistic regression models for individual and household/community predictors of modern contraceptive use.
| Variables | Model 1 | Model II | Model III | Model IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| aOR[95% CI] | aOR[95% CI] | aOR[95% CI] | ||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| 15–24 | RC | RC | ||
| 25–34 | 1.08 [0.94–1.23] | 0.99 [0.87–1.14] | ||
| 35 & above | 0.89 [0.76–1.03] | 0.79 | ||
|
| ||||
| No Education | RC | RC | ||
| Primary | 2.16 | 1.77 | ||
| Secondary & above | 3.02 | 2.15 | ||
|
| ||||
| Never married | RC | RC | ||
| Married | 0.23 | 0.23 | ||
| Cohabitating | 0.26 | 0.27 | ||
| Separated/divorced/widowed | 0.41 | 0.43 | ||
|
| ||||
| Christianity | RC | RC | ||
| Islam | 0.62 | 0.60 | ||
| Traditionalist & others | 0.36 | 0.44 | ||
|
| ||||
| No | RC | RC | ||
| Yes | 1.09 [0.97–1.21] | 1.09 [0.97–1.21] | ||
|
| ||||
| Hausa | RC | RC | ||
| Yoruba | 2.46 | 1.67 | ||
| Igbo | 1.11 [0.89–1.38] | 1.09 [0.82–1.44] | ||
| Others | 1.42 | 1.22 | ||
|
| ||||
| 0 | RC | RC | ||
| 1–3 | 3.22 | 3.32 | ||
| 4 & above | 7.01 | 7.49 | ||
|
| ||||
| No | RC | RC | ||
| Yes | 1.48 | 1.28 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Urban | RC | RC | ||
| Rural | 0.95 [0.82–1.09] | 0.90 [0.79–1.04] | ||
|
| ||||
| Poorest | RC | RC | ||
| Poorer | 1.22*[1.01–1.47] | 1.17 [0.97–1.41] | ||
| Middle | 1.43 | 1.28 | ||
| Richer | 1.73 | 1.49 | ||
| Richest | 1.72 | 1.49 | ||
|
| ||||
| North Central | RC | RC | ||
| North East | 0.73 | 1.01 [0.82–1.23] | ||
| North West | 0.38 | 0.67 | ||
| South East | 0.49 | 0.42 | ||
| South-South | 0.59 | 0.47 | ||
| South West | 0.91 [0.74–1.11] | 0.69 | ||
|
| ||||
| Male | RC | RC | ||
| Female | 1.17*[1.03–1.34] | 0.94 [0.81–1.10] | ||
|
| ||||
| Low | RC | RC | ||
| Medium | 1.72 | 1.48 | ||
|
| ||||
| Low | RC | RC | ||
| Medium | 2.60 | 1.65 | ||
| High | 4.22 | 2.25 | ||
|
| ||||
| Low | RC | RC | ||
| Medium | 0.93 [0.74–1.15] | 0.98 [0.79–1.21] | ||
| High | 1.04 [0.86–1.26] | 1.16 [0.97–1.40] | ||
|
| ||||
| PSU Variance (95% CI) | 1.46[1.27–1.66] | 0.54[0.46–0.66] | 0.55[0.46–0.66] | 0.42[0.33–0.52] |
| ICC | 0.31 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.11 |
| LR Test | χ2 = 1435.98, p<0.001 | χ2 = 353.52, p<0.001 | χ2 = 378.95, p<0.001 | χ2 = 148.30, p<0.001 |
| Wald χ2 | Reference | 1233.18 | 813.59 | 1435.88 |
|
| ||||
| Log-likelihood | -8717.03 | -8085.29 | -8316.22 | -7952.53 |
| AIC | 17438.05 | 16206.58 | 16668.45 | 15973.06 |
| BIC | 17454.21 | 16352.01 | 16813.88 | 16247.77 |
| Number of clusters | 1388 | 1388 | 1388 | 1388 |
Weighted NDHS, 2018.
Exponentiated coefficients; 95% confidence intervals in brackets; AOR = adjusted Odds Ratios; CI = Confidence Interval; RC = Reference Category.
*p< 0.05
**p< 0.01
***p< 0.001.
ICC = Intra-Class Correlation; BIC = Schwarz’s Bayesian Information Criteria; AIC = Akaike’s Information Criterion; LR Test = Likelihood ratio Test; PSU = Primary Sampling Unit.
Model 0 is the null model, without any explanatory variable at the baseline model.
Model I is adjusted for individual-level variables (Age of respondent, media exposure, educational level, marital status, ethnicity, currently working, religious affiliation, and parity).
Model II is adjusted for household/community level variables (Place of residence, wealth index, region, sex of household head, community modern contraceptive method knowledge, community literacy level, community socioeconomic status).
Model III is the final model adjusted for individual and household/community level variables.