| Literature DB >> 34878777 |
Ruben G G Leenders1, Shoshy Alam Brinch2,3, Sven T Sowa4, Enya Amundsen-Isaksen2,3, Albert Galera-Prat4, Sudarshan Murthy4, Sjoerd Aertssen1, Johannes N Smits1, Piotr Nieczypor1, Eddy Damen1, Anita Wegert1, Marc Nazaré5, Lari Lehtiö4, Jo Waaler2,3, Stefan Krauss2,3.
Abstract
Tankyrase 1 and 2 (TNKS1/2) catalyze post-translational modification by poly-ADP-ribosylation of a plethora of target proteins. In this function, TNKS1/2 also impact the WNT/β-catenin and Hippo signaling pathways that are involved in numerous human disease conditions including cancer. Targeting TNKS1/2 with small-molecule inhibitors shows promising potential to modulate the involved pathways, thereby potentiating disease intervention. Based on our 1,2,4-triazole-based lead compound 1 (OM-1700), further structure-activity relationship analyses of East-, South- and West-single-point alterations and hybrids identified compound 24 (OM-153). Compound 24 showed picomolar IC50 inhibition in a cellular (HEK293) WNT/β-catenin signaling reporter assay, no off-target liabilities, overall favorable absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties, and an improved pharmacokinetic profile in mice. Moreover, treatment with compound 24 induced dose-dependent biomarker engagement and reduced cell growth in the colon cancer cell line COLO 320DM.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34878777 PMCID: PMC8713164 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Chem ISSN: 0022-2623 Impact factor: 7.446
Figure 1Lead compound 1 (OM-1700) and main modifications.
West Variations of 1 (OM-1700)a
The IC50 values of the compounds of this work were determined with both the TNKS2 biochemical assay (quadruplicates used for each concentration tested, 95% confidence intervals are given in parentheses) and the cellular (HEK293) WNT/β-catenin signaling reporter assay (triplicates used for each concentration tested, T/F-tests were performed for the IC50 curve fitting; all p > 0.95).
East Naphthyridines and Quinoxalinesa
The IC50 values of the compounds of this work were determined with both the TNKS2 biochemical assay (quadruplicates used for each concentration tested, 95% confidence intervals are given in parentheses) and the cellular (HEK293) WNT/β-catenin signaling reporter assay (triplicates used for each concentration tested, T/F-tests were performed for the IC50 curve fitting; all p > 0.95). * indicates a shortlisted compound. # averages of multiple independent measurements; standard error of the means (SEMs) are shown in Table .
Profiling of Compound 24
| parameter | ||
|---|---|---|
| efficacy | ||
| TNKS1 (IC50, nM (pIC50 ±
SEM)) | 127 (6.90 ± 0.05) | 13 (7.90 ± 0.054) |
| TNKS2
(IC50, nM (pIC50 ±
SEM)) | 14 (7.85 ± 0.04) | 2.0 (8.71 ± 0.069) |
| HEK293 reporter assay (IC50, nM (pIC50 ± SEM)) | 19 (7.75 ± 0.067) | 0.63 (9.22 ± 0.037) |
| COLO 320DM/RKO cells (GI50, nM) | 650/>10 000 | 10/>10 000 |
| ADME | ||
| kinetic solubility PBS pH = 7 (μM) | >80 | 31 |
| Caco-2
A–B: | 39.5 | 40.5 |
| Caco-2 efflux ratio | 0.61 | 0.64 |
| microsomal stability human/mouse/dog CLint (μL/min/mg protein) | <5/27/nd | 18/22/3.8 |
| mouse plasma stability | >120 | >120 |
| mouse PPB (%) | 93.92 | 98.58 |
| off-target | ||
| PARPs | >10 | >10 |
| hERG inhibition (IC50, μM) | >25 | >25 |
| Ames test | nongenotoxic | nongenotoxic |
| CYP3A4 inhibition (IC50, μM) | >25 | >25 |
| CYP induction (human PXR) | nd | nonactivator |
| Cerep Safety panel 44 targets@10 μM (inhibition) | clean, (A2A, 53%) | clean, (all <50%) |
| mouse pharmacokinetics | ||
| PO PK
mouse | 0.67 | 1.5 |
| PO PK mouse | 3202 | 1967 |
| PO PK mouse CL (L/h/kg) | 2.09 | 0.99 |
| PO PK mouse | 2.03 | 2.15 |
| PO PK mouse AUC 0 → | 2384 | 4945 |
| calculated properties | ||
| MW (g/mol) | 458.5 | 509.6 |
| clog | 3.1 | 3.4 |
| tPSA | 95 | 108 |
See Figure 1, Supporting Information.
See Table 1, Supporting Information.
Highest concentration, 100 μM.
Calculated by DataWarrior v5.5.0.
East Quinoxaline Variationsa
The IC50 values of the compounds of this work were determined with both the TNKS2 biochemical assay (quadruplicates used for each concentration tested, 95% confidence intervals are given in parentheses) and the cellular (HEK293) WNT/β-catenin signaling reporter assay (triplicates used for each concentration tested, T/F-tests were performed for the IC50 curve fitting; all p > 0.95). * indicates shortlisted compound. # averages of multiple independent measurements; SEMs are shown in Table .
Figure 2Short list of six compounds and 1 including their respective biochemical TNKS2 and cellular (HEK293) WNT/β-catenin signaling reporter assays IC50 values in nM. clog P and tPSA (in Å2) as calculated by DataWarrior v5.5.0. Moieties in color were different from 1.
Mouse PO PK 5 mg/kg and Kinetic Solubility Data of 1 and the Six Shortlisted Compounds
| compound | AUC 0 → | AUC 0 → ∞ (ng/mL·h) | MRT 0 → ∞ (h) | CL (L/h/kg) | solubility (μM) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.67 | 0.25 | 3203 | 2384 | 2388 | 0.69 | 2.03 | 2.09 | >80 | |
| 1.00 | 0.25 | 285 | 319 | 322 | 1.56 | 22.4 | 15.6 | >80 | |
| 1.17 | 0.25 | 779 | 543 | 547 | 1.39 | 15.5 | 9.14 | 50 | |
| 1.50 | 0.5 | 1967 | 4945 | 5038 | 2.39 | 2.15 | 0.99 | 31 | |
| 0.69 | 0.5 | 6512 | 15 083 | 15 105 | 1.93 | 0.33 | 0.33 | >80 | |
| 0.76 | 0.25 | 2770 | 3401 | 3404 | 1.24 | 1.61 | 1.47 | >80 | |
| 0.59 | 0.25 | 5796 | 5313 | 5316 | 1.47 | 0.80 | 0.94 | 13 |
Figure 3Co-crystal structure of TNKS2 with 24 (PDB 7O6X). The protein is shown in blue, and 24 in green. The dashed lines in black represent hydrogen bonds, and the red spheres represent water molecules. The σA weighted 2Fo – Fc electron density maps around the ligands are contoured at 1.8σ.
Figure 4Compound 24 decreased cell growth and inhibited WNT/β-catenin signaling activity in COLO 320DM cells. (a) 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) colorimetric cell growth assay for various doses of 24 in APCmutated COLO 320DM (black) and APCwild-type RKO (gray) cells. After 5 days, the antiproliferative effect of compound treatment was measured at 490 nm. Mean value ± standard deviation (SD) for one representative experiment of more than three repeated assays, each with six replicates, are shown. Dotted lines depict 50% (GI50-value) and 25% (GI25-value) growth inhibition levels and control = 100% (0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)). (b) Representative immunoblots of cytoplasmic TNKS1/2, AXIN1, AXIN2, and cytoplasmic and nuclear transcriptionally active β-catenin (non-phospho) and β-catenin. Actin and lamin B1 show equal protein loading, while # indicates that the same actin immunoblot is used as loading control for both AXIN2 and β-catenin. For (b) and (c), control = 0.001% DMSO. (c) Real-time RT-qPCR analyses of WNT/β-catenin signaling target genes (AXIN2, DKK1, NKD1, and APCDD1). Boxplots show median, first and third quartiles, and maximum and minimum whiskers for combined data from three independent experiments with three replicates each. Dotted lines depict the control mean value = 1. For (a) and (c), analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests (Holm–Sidak method, versus control) are indicated by *** (p < 0.001) and * (p < 0.05), while ANOVA on ranks tests (Dunn’s method, versus control) are indicated by † (p < 0.05).