| Literature DB >> 34876808 |
Hui-Jun Wang1, Chun-Yan Zhou1, Yan-Ding Su1, Kai-Feng Gou1, Xiao-Nan Geng1, Xiang-Jun Qiu1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A new UPLC-MS/MS technique for the determination of ripretinib in beagle dog plasma was developed, and the pharmacokinetic effects of voriconazole and itraconazole on ripretinib in beagle dogs were studied.Entities:
Keywords: UPLC-MS/MS; beagle dog; itraconazole; pharmacokinetics; ripretinib; voriconazole
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34876808 PMCID: PMC8643159 DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S337864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther ISSN: 1177-8881 Impact factor: 4.162
Figure 1The Chemical structure of ripretinib (A) and avapritinib (IS, (B) in this study.
The Gradient Elution Program of UPLC
| Time (min) | 0.1% Formic Acid | Acetonitrile | Flow Rate (mL/min) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 70% | 30% | 0.4 |
| 0.9 | 15% | 85% | 0.4 |
| 1.0 | 70% | 30% | 0.4 |
| 2.0 | 70% | 30% | 0.4 |
Figure 2The ion transitions from parent ion to daughter ion of ripretinib (A) and IS (B).
Figure 3Representative chromatograms of ripretinib and IS. (A) blank beagle dog plasma; (B) blank plasma spiked with standard solutions; (C) sample obtained from beagle dog at 2.0 h after oral administration of 5 mg/kg ripretinib.
Precision and Accuracy of Ripretinib in Beagle Dog Plasma (n = 6)
| Added (ng/mL) | Intra-Day | Inter-Day | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Found (ng/mL) | RSD (%) | RE (%) | Found (ng/mL) | RSD (%) | RE (%) | |
| 1.0 | 0.99 ± 0.09 | 8.77 | −0.65 | 1.01 ± 0.07 | 7.28 | 1.06 |
| 2.5 | 2.43 ± 0.16 | 6.48 | −2.80 | 2.51 ± 0.07 | 2.64 | 0.47 |
| 100 | 100.24 ± 4.55 | 4.54 | 0.24 | 99.37 ± 1.05 | 1.06 | −0.63 |
| 750 | 753.11 ± 15.37 | 2.04 | 0.41 | 735.91 ± 14.90 | 2.02 | −1.88 |
Recovery and Matrix Effect of Ripretinib in Beagle Dog Plasma (n = 6, Mean ± SD)
| Skipped (ng/mL) | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) | Matrix Effect (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 | 85.39 ± 2.97 | 3.48 | 96.64 ± 6.11 | 6.32 |
| 100 | 86.55 ± 3.37 | 3.89 | 102.85 ± 3.17 | 3.08 |
| 750 | 87.15 ± 2.88 | 3.31 | 100.06 ± 2.79 | 2.79 |
Stability Results of Ripretinib in Beagle Dog Plasma Under Four Conditions (n = 6)
| Added (ng/mL) | Room Temperature, 4 h | Autosampler 4 °C, 6 h | Three Freeze-Thaw | −20°C, 4 Weeks | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSD (%) | RE (%) | RSD (%) | RE (%) | RSD (%) | RE (%) | RSD (%) | RE (%) | |
| 2.5 | 6.07 | 1.07 | 5.91 | −1.00 | 5.46 | −5.93 | 6.04 | 1.87 |
| 100 | 3.26 | −1.93 | 4.08 | 2.03 | 4.89 | 1.05 | 2.82 | −3.55 |
| 750 | 3.28 | 0.76 | 2.44 | −4.42 | 3.05 | 1.26 | 2.20 | −4.55 |
Figure 4(A, B) Mean plasma concentration–time curves of ripretinib after oral administration of ripretinib at a single dose of 5 mg/kg in group A, B and C (n = 6).
The Main Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Ripretinib After Oral Administration of Ripretinib at a Single Dose of 5 mg/kg in Group A, B and C (n = 6, Mean ± SD)
| Parameters | Group A | Group B | Group C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tmax (h) | 2.25 ± 0.61 | 2.67 ± 0.52 | 2.50± 0.55 |
| Cmax (ng/mL) | 543.85 ± 109.02 | 752.43 ± 97.08* | 692.19 ± 104.62* |
| t1/2 (h) | 6.96 ± 0.31 | 7.53 ± 0.83 | 7.33 ± 1.27 |
| CLz/F (L/h/kg) | 1.26 ± 0.16 | 0.93 ± 0.16 | 1.01 ± 0.14 |
| Vz/F (L/kg) | 12.65 ± 1.75 | 10.26 ± 2.78 | 10.70 ± 2.73 |
| AUC0→t (ng•h/mL) | 3998.15 ± 556.19 | 5451.64 ± 994.02* | 5018.56 ± 701.04* |
| AUC0→∞ (ng•h/mL) | 4030.67 ± 563.22 | 5494.42 ± 997.98* | 5056.46 ± 698.13* |
Notes: Group A - ripretinib, Group B - itraconazole + ripretinib, Group C - voriconazole + ripretinib. *Compared with group A, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).