Literature DB >> 34876513

The nonlinear feedback dynamics of asymmetric political polarization.

Naomi Ehrich Leonard1, Keena Lipsitz2, Anastasia Bizyaeva3, Alessio Franci4, Yphtach Lelkes5.   

Abstract

Using a general model of opinion dynamics, we conduct a systematic investigation of key mechanisms driving elite polarization in the United States. We demonstrate that the self-reinforcing nature of elite-level processes can explain this polarization, with voter preferences accounting for its asymmetric nature. Our analysis suggests that subtle differences in the frequency and amplitude with which public opinion shifts left and right over time may have a differential effect on the self-reinforcing processes of elites, causing Republicans to polarize more quickly than Democrats. We find that as self-reinforcement approaches a critical threshold, polarization speeds up. Republicans appear to have crossed that threshold while Democrats are currently approaching it.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bifurcations; nonlinear dynamics; political elites; political polarization; public opinion

Year:  2021        PMID: 34876513      PMCID: PMC8685731          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2102149118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  1 in total

1.  Link recommendation algorithms and dynamics of polarization in online social networks.

Authors:  Fernando P Santos; Yphtach Lelkes; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total
  11 in total

1.  How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting.

Authors:  Petter Törnberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  A systems framework for remedying dysfunction in US democracy.

Authors:  Samuel S-H Wang; Jonathan Cervas; Bernard Grofman; Keena Lipsitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Link recommendation algorithms and dynamics of polarization in online social networks.

Authors:  Fernando P Santos; Yphtach Lelkes; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Polarization, diversity, and democratic robustness.

Authors:  Jenna Bednar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Interindividual cooperation mediated by partisanship complicates Madison's cure for "mischiefs of faction".

Authors:  Mari Kawakatsu; Yphtach Lelkes; Simon A Levin; Corina E Tarnita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  National polarization and international agreements.

Authors:  Charles Perrings; Michael Hechter; Robert Mamada
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  The emergence and perils of polarization.

Authors:  Delia Baldassarri; Scott E Page
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  The dynamics of political polarization.

Authors:  Simon A Levin; Helen V Milner; Charles Perrings
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Inequality, identity, and partisanship: How redistribution can stem the tide of mass polarization.

Authors:  Alexander J Stewart; Joshua B Plotkin; Nolan McCarty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 12.779

10.  Universality of political corruption networks.

Authors:  Alvaro F Martins; Bruno R da Cunha; Quentin S Hanley; Sebastián Gonçalves; Matjaž Perc; Haroldo V Ribeiro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.