BACKGROUND: In kidney transplantation, a contrast CT scan is obtained in the donor candidate to detect subclinical pathology in the kidney. Recent work from the Aging Kidney Anatomy study has characterized kidney, cortex, and medulla volumes using a manual image-processing tool. However, this technique is time consuming and impractical for clinical care, and thus, these measurements are not obtained during donor evaluations. This study proposes a fully automated segmentation approach for measuring kidney, cortex, and medulla volumes. METHODS: A total of 1930 contrast-enhanced CT exams with reference standard manual segmentations from one institution were used to develop the algorithm. A convolutional neural network model was trained (n=1238) and validated (n=306), and then evaluated in a hold-out test set of reference standard segmentations (n=386). After the initial evaluation, the algorithm was further tested on datasets originating from two external sites (n=1226). RESULTS: The automated model was found to perform on par with manual segmentation, with errors similar to interobserver variability with manual segmentation. Compared with the reference standard, the automated approach achieved a Dice similarity metric of 0.94 (right cortex), 0.90 (right medulla), 0.94 (left cortex), and 0.90 (left medulla) in the test set. Similar performance was observed when the algorithm was applied on the two external datasets. CONCLUSIONS: A fully automated approach for measuring cortex and medullary volumes in CT images of the kidneys has been established. This method may prove useful for a wide range of clinical applications.
BACKGROUND: In kidney transplantation, a contrast CT scan is obtained in the donor candidate to detect subclinical pathology in the kidney. Recent work from the Aging Kidney Anatomy study has characterized kidney, cortex, and medulla volumes using a manual image-processing tool. However, this technique is time consuming and impractical for clinical care, and thus, these measurements are not obtained during donor evaluations. This study proposes a fully automated segmentation approach for measuring kidney, cortex, and medulla volumes. METHODS: A total of 1930 contrast-enhanced CT exams with reference standard manual segmentations from one institution were used to develop the algorithm. A convolutional neural network model was trained (n=1238) and validated (n=306), and then evaluated in a hold-out test set of reference standard segmentations (n=386). After the initial evaluation, the algorithm was further tested on datasets originating from two external sites (n=1226). RESULTS: The automated model was found to perform on par with manual segmentation, with errors similar to interobserver variability with manual segmentation. Compared with the reference standard, the automated approach achieved a Dice similarity metric of 0.94 (right cortex), 0.90 (right medulla), 0.94 (left cortex), and 0.90 (left medulla) in the test set. Similar performance was observed when the algorithm was applied on the two external datasets. CONCLUSIONS: A fully automated approach for measuring cortex and medullary volumes in CT images of the kidneys has been established. This method may prove useful for a wide range of clinical applications.
Authors: Ghaneh Fananapazir; Robert Benzl; Michael T Corwin; Ling-Xin Chen; Junichiro Sageshima; Susan L Stewart; Christoph Troppmann Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Alan S L Yu; Chengli Shen; Douglas P Landsittel; Peter C Harris; Vicente E Torres; Michal Mrug; Kyongtae T Bae; Jared J Grantham; Frederic F Rahbari-Oskoui; Michael F Flessner; William M Bennett; Arlene B Chapman Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Maatje D A van Gastel; Marie E Edwards; Vicente E Torres; Bradley J Erickson; Ron T Gansevoort; Timothy L Kline Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Jared J Grantham; Vicente E Torres; Arlene B Chapman; Lisa M Guay-Woodford; Kyongtae T Bae; Bernard F King; Louis H Wetzel; Deborah A Baumgarten; Phillip J Kenney; Peter C Harris; Saulo Klahr; William M Bennett; Gladys N Hirschman; Catherine M Meyers; Xiaoling Zhang; Fang Zhu; John P Miller Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-05-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexander D Weston; Panagiotis Korfiatis; Kenneth A Philbrick; Gian Marco Conte; Petro Kostandy; Thomas Sakinis; Atefeh Zeinoddini; Arunnit Boonrod; Michael Moynagh; Naoki Takahashi; Bradley J Erickson Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Samia Rafael Yamashita; Augusto Castelli von Atzingen; Wagner Iared; Alexandre Sérgio de Araújo Bezerra; Adriano Luiz Ammirati; Maria Eugênia Fernandes Canziani; Giuseppe D'Ippolito Journal: Radiol Bras Date: 2015 Jan-Feb
Authors: Xiangling Wang; Terri J Vrtiska; Ramesh T Avula; Leah R Walters; Harini A Chakkera; Walter K Kremers; Lilach O Lerman; Andrew D Rule Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Kanishka Sharma; Christian Rupprecht; Anna Caroli; Maria Carolina Aparicio; Andrea Remuzzi; Maximilian Baust; Nassir Navab Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Kaiyue Diao; Yuntian Chen; Ying Liu; Bo-Jiang Chen; Wan-Jiang Li; Lin Zhang; Ya-Li Qu; Tong Zhang; Yun Zhang; Min Wu; Kang Li; Bin Song Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2022-06