Literature DB >> 34876378

Defining successful outcomes and preferences for clinical management in differences/disorders of sex development: Protocol overview and a qualitative phenomenological study of stakeholders' perspectives.

Kristina I Suorsa-Johnson1, Melissa D Gardner1, Alison Baskin2, Larry D Gruppen3, Angela Rose4, Meilan M Rutter5, Tara Schafer-Kalkhoff6, Dawn Stacey7, Kathleen D van Leeuwen8, Erica M Weidler8, David E Sandberg9.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Utilizing a qualitative phenomenological design, the Defining Successful Outcomes and Trade-offs study examined stakeholder perspectives regarding optimal healthcare delivery and outcomes for individuals with a difference/disorder of sex development (DSD).
OBJECTIVE: We describe study methods and provide an overview of themes and subthemes. STUDY
DESIGN: Interviews were conducted with individuals with a DSD (n = 24), parents of those with a DSD (n = 19), healthcare providers (n = 37), and others (n = 30). Primary questions regarding clinical management of patients with DSD were: "What is a successful outcome?" and "How do you achieve it?"
RESULTS: Themes included: understanding of DSD diagnosis and self-efficacy in management is necessary but complex; patient and family psychological well-being; support from others versus being stigmatized; affected person experiences physical health and accepts the implications of their condition; complexities in DSD decision making, roles and expectations; and knowledgeable providers and multidisciplinary teams are essential, notwithstanding persisting barriers. Participants recognized competing values potentially forcing trade-offs in decision making. DISCUSSION: Recognition of diverse and sometimes conflicting perspectives regarding optimal pathways of care and outcomes - both within and among those with DSD and their providers -promises to enhance shared decision making.
CONCLUSION: Diverse perspectives and perceptions of trade-offs associated with DSD healthcare emphasize the need to tailor care for patients and families.
Copyright © 2021 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Differences of sex development; Disorders of sex development; Healthcare; Intersex; Outcomes; Shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34876378      PMCID: PMC8983568          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  27 in total

1.  Managing intersex.

Authors:  S Creighton; C Minto
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-12-01

Review 2.  Training health professionals in shared decision making: Update of an international environmental scan.

Authors:  Ndeye Thiab Diouf; Matthew Menear; Hubert Robitaille; Geneviève Painchaud Guérard; France Légaré
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-06-14

Review 3.  Timing and nature of reconstructive surgery for disorders of sex development - introduction.

Authors:  Sarah Creighton; Steven D Chernausek; Rodrigo Romao; Philip Ransley; Joao Pippi Salle
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 4.  Disorders of sex development peer support.

Authors:  Arlene B Baratz; Melissa K Sharp; David E Sandberg
Journal:  Endocr Dev       Date:  2014-09-09

5.  Disorders of sex development: Mothers' experiences of support.

Authors:  Clare Chivers; Jan Burns; Martha Deiros Collado
Journal:  Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.544

6.  Parent perceptions of psychosocial care for children with differences of sex development.

Authors:  C E Crerand; H M Kapa; J L Litteral; L Nahata; B Combs; J A Indyk; V R Jayanthi; Y-M Chan; A C Tishelman; J Hansen-Moore
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 7.  Surgery in disorders of sex development (DSD) with a gender issue: If (why), when, and how?

Authors:  Pierre D E Mouriquand; Daniela Brindusa Gorduza; Claire-Lise Gay; Heino F L Meyer-Bahlburg; Linda Baker; Laurence S Baskin; Claire Bouvattier; Luis H Braga; Anthony C Caldamone; Lise Duranteau; Alaa El Ghoneimi; Terry W Hensle; Piet Hoebeke; Martin Kaefer; Nicolas Kalfa; Thomas F Kolon; Gianantonio Manzoni; Pierre-Yves Mure; Agneta Nordenskjöld; J L Pippi Salle; Dix Phillip Poppas; Philip G Ransley; Richard C Rink; Romao Rodrigo; Léon Sann; Justine Schober; Hisham Sibai; Amy Wisniewski; Katja P Wolffenbuttel; Peter Lee
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 1.830

8.  The effect of clitoral surgery on sexual outcome in individuals who have intersex conditions with ambiguous genitalia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catherine L Minto; Lih-Mei Liao; Christopher R J Woodhouse; Phillip G Ransley; Sarah M Creighton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Decision coaching to support shared decision making: a framework, evidence, and implications for nursing practice, education, and policy.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Mary Ann Murray; France Légaré; Dunn Sandy; Prudy Menard; Annette O'Connor
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Global Disorders of Sex Development Update since 2006: Perceptions, Approach and Care.

Authors:  Peter A Lee; Anna Nordenström; Christopher P Houk; S Faisal Ahmed; Richard Auchus; Arlene Baratz; Katharine Baratz Dalke; Lih-Mei Liao; Karen Lin-Su; Leendert H J Looijenga; Tom Mazur; Heino F L Meyer-Bahlburg; Pierre Mouriquand; Charmian A Quigley; David E Sandberg; Eric Vilain; Selma Witchel
Journal:  Horm Res Paediatr       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.