| Literature DB >> 34876116 |
Pariya Shaigani1, Dania Awad1, Veronika Redai1, Monika Fuchs1, Martina Haack1, Norbert Mehlmer2, Thomas Brueck3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oleaginous yeasts are promising microbial platforms for sustainable, bio-based production of biofuels and oleochemical building blocks. Bio-based residues provide sustainable and cost-effective carbon sources for fermentative yeast oil production without land-use change. Considering the regional abundancy of different waste streams, we chose complex biomass residue streams of marine origin; macroalgae hydrolysate, and terrestrial origin; wheat straw hydrolysate in the presence, and absence of corn steep liquor as a complex nitrogen source. We investigated the biomass and lipid yields of an array of well-described oleaginous yeasts; R. glutinis, T. asahii, R. mucilaginosa, R. toruloides, C. oleaginosus growing on these hydrolysates. Furthermore, their sugar utilization, fatty acid profile, and inhibitory effect of the hydrolysates on yeast growth were compared. For correlative reference, we initially performed comparative growth experiments for the strains on individual monomeric sugars separately. Each of these monomeric sugars was a dominant carbon source in the complex biomass hydrolysates evaluated in this study. In addition, we evaluated N-acetylglucosamine, the monomeric building block of chitin, as a low-cost nitrogen and carbon source in yeast fermentation.Entities:
Keywords: Biomass yield; Carbon substrate preference; Complex lignocellulosic/marine biomass hydrolysate; Fermentation inhibitor tolerance; Lipid yield; Oleaginous yeasts
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34876116 PMCID: PMC8650408 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-021-01710-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Sugar content of the synthetic media and complex hydrolysates
| Media | [Glucose] g/L | [Xylose] g/L | [Mannitol] g/L | [GlcNAc] g/L | [CSL] g/L | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synthetic media | MNM-Glu | 30 | – | – | – | – |
| MNM-Xyl | – | 30 | – | – | – | |
| MNM-Man | – | – | 30 | – | – | |
| MPM-GlcNAc | – | – | – | 30 | – | |
| Complex hydrolysates | 19.0 ± 0.1 | 4.4 ± 0.02 | 9.2 ± 0.04 | nd | – | |
| Wheat straw hydrolysate | 27.5 ± 0.3 | 14.0 ± 0.2 | nd | nd | – | |
| Wheat straw hydrolysate + corn steep liquor | 27.5 ± 0.3 | 14.0 ± 0.2 | nd | nd | 5.0 |
nd not detected
Fig. 1Growth rates and substrate consumption of each yeast strain in the synthetic media: A C. oleaginosus growth rates and substrate consumption on each monomeric sugar as the only carbon source; B T. asahii. C R. glutinis. D R. mucilaginosa. E R. toruloides
Measurement of lipid productivity and yield, biomass yield, and total utilized sugar in all media
| Strain | Media | Incubation time (h) | Lipid productivity (g/Lh) | Lipid yield gLipid/gSugar | Biomass yield gBiomass/gSugar | [Total utilized sugar] g/L | Total sugar consumption % (w/w) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNM-Glu | 72 | 0.066 | 0.19 | 0.337 | 24.2 | 80.8 | |
| 96 | 0.062 | 0.17 | 0.329 | 29.3 | 97.6 | ||
| MNM-Xyl | 72 | 0.057 | 0.20 | 0.326 | 21.0 | 70.0 | |
| 96 | 0.036 | 0.15 | 0.306 | 23.9 | 79.7 | ||
| MNM-Man | 72 | 0.011 | 0.177 | 0.679 | 4.7 | 15.5 | |
| 96 | 0.009 | 0.183 | 0.770 | 4.7 | 15.7 | ||
| MPM-GlcNAc | 48 | 0.042 | 0.10 | 0.376 | 20.2 | 67.5 | |
| 72 | 0.027 | 0.10 | 0.357 | 20.4 | 67.8 | ||
| 96 | 0.018 | 0.09 | 0.312 | 20.2 | 67.3 | ||
| BAH | 72 | 0.045 | 0.13 | 0.675 | 24.6 | 73.8 | |
| 96 | 0.040 | 0.16 | 0.697 | 24.4 | 73.2 | ||
| WSH | 72 | 0.091 | 0.18 | 0.421 | 34.9 | 83.2 | |
| 96 | 0.079 | 0.19 | 0.394 | 40.3 | 96.0 | ||
| WSH + CSL | 72 | 0.097 | 0.19 | 0.373 | 40.2 | 95.8 | |
| 96 | 0.072 | 0.17 | 0.419 | 40.2 | 95.8 | ||
| MNM-Glu | 72 | 0.005 | 0.03 | 0.295 | 14.0 | 46.6 | |
| 96 | 0.011 | 0.07 | 0.269 | 15.3 | 51.0 | ||
| MNM-Xyl | 72 | 0.005 | 0.03 | 0.258 | 13.5 | 45.0 | |
| 96 | 0.009 | 0.06 | 0.277 | 13.1 | 43.8 | ||
| MNM-Man | 72 | 0.003 | 0.14 | 0.939 | 1.6 | 5.3 | |
| 96 | 0.001 | 0.07 | 1.058 | 1.4 | 4.8 | ||
| MPM-GlcNAc | 48 | 0.004 | 0.02 | 0.333 | 8.5 | 27.6 | |
| 72 | 0.003 | 0.03 | 0.389 | 8.3 | 27.6 | ||
| 96 | 0.003 | 0.03 | 0.407 | 8.3 | 27.6 | ||
| BAH | 72 | 0.020 | 0.08 | 0.780 | 18.1 | 54.5 | |
| 96 | 0.019 | 0.10 | 0.804 | 18.5 | 55.5 | ||
| WSH | 72 | 0.007 | 0.04 | 0.401 | 13.1 | 31.3 | |
| 96 | 0.009 | 0.06 | 0.460 | 13.8 | 32.8 | ||
| WSH + CSL | 72 | 0.008 | 0.03 | 0.266 | 18.5 | 44.0 | |
| 96 | 0.009 | 0.04 | 0.239 | 23.6 | 56.2 | ||
| MNM-Glu | 72 | 0.009 | 0.05 | 0.341 | 13.5 | 45.2 | |
| 96 | 0.011 | 0.06 | 0.291 | 15.8 | 61.8 | ||
| MNM-Xyl | 72 | 0.012 | 0.07 | 0.243 | 7.3 | 41.1 | |
| 96 | 0.007 | 0.05 | 0.230 | 13.7 | 45.7 | ||
| BAH | 72 | 0.035 | 0.11 | 0.713 | 23.3 | 69.9 | |
| 96 | 0.028 | 0.12 | 0.723 | 23.5 | 70.5 | ||
| WSH | 72 | 0.020 | 0.08 | 0.549 | 18.7 | 44.5 | |
| 96 | 0.019 | 0.09 | 0.488 | 19.7 | 46.8 | ||
| WSH + CSL | 72 | 0.027 | 0.08 | 0.427 | 23.9 | 57.0 | |
| 96 | 0.023 | 0.08 | 0.449 | 27.0 | 64.3 | ||
| MNM-Glu | 72 | 0.004 | 0.03 | 0.303 | 11.4 | 37.9 | |
| 96 | 0.007 | 0.04 | 0.225 | 14.4 | 48.1 | ||
| MNM-Xyl | 72 | 0.005 | 0.03 | 0.246 | 11.0 | 36.6 | |
| 96 | 0.003 | 0.03 | 0.268 | 10.3 | 34.4 | ||
| BAH | 72 | 0.021 | 0.07 | 0.704 | 20.6 | 62.0 | |
| 96 | 0.014 | 0.06 | 0.709 | 20.6 | 62.0 | ||
| WSH | 72 | 0.010 | 0.05 | 0.553 | 13.3 | 31.6 | |
| 96 | 0.007 | 0.05 | 0.518 | 14.1 | 33.7 | ||
| WSH + CSL | 72 | 0.010 | 0.04 | 0.468 | 19.2 | 45.7 | |
| 96 | 0.009 | 0.04 | 0.474 | 21.5 | 51.2 | ||
| MNM-Glu | 72 | 0.019 | 0.09 | 0.253 | 16.2 | 53.9 | |
| 96 | 0.018 | 0.10 | 0.242 | 16.7 | 55.6 | ||
| MNM-Xyl | 72 | 0.013 | 0.07 | 0.260 | 12.4 | 41.4 | |
| 96 | 0.011 | 0.07 | 0.219 | 15.8 | 52.7 | ||
| MNM-Man | 72 | 0.022 | 0.14 | 0.375 | 11.0 | 36.6 | |
| 96 | 0.021 | 0.14 | 0.367 | 14.1 | 47.0 | ||
| BAH | 72 | 0.038 | 0.11 | 0.614 | 25.6 | 76.8 | |
| 96 | 0.015 | 0.05 | 0.593 | 26.3 | 78.9 |
The stationary phases were determined according to the DCWs, and afterward time points 72 h and 96 h were selected to analyze the lipid accumulations
Fig. 2Growth rates and substrate consumption of each yeast strain in the complex media: A C. oleaginosus growth rates and substrate consumption B T. asahii. C R. glutinis. D R. mucilaginosa. E R. toruloides
Fig. 3Lipid contents and total lipid of each yeast strain in the synthetic media: A C. oleaginosus lipid content and lipid concentrations in synthetic medium containing each monomeric sugar as the only carbon source; B T. asahii. C R. glutinis. D R. mucilaginosa. E R. toruloides
Fig. 4Lipid contents and total lipid of each yeast strain in the complex media: A C. oleaginosus lipid content and lipid concentrations in each complex medium B T. asahii. C R. glutinis. D R. mucilaginosa. E R. toruloides
Fig. 5Fatty acid profile of each strain in different media after 96 h incubation