Kristin N Ray1, James C Bohnhoff2, Kelsey Schweiberger2, Gina M Sequeira3, Janel Hanmer4, Jeremy M Kahn5. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 3414 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. Electronic address: Kristin.ray@chp.edu. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 3414 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. 3. Seattle Children's Hospital, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 5. Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based strategies are needed to support appropriate use of telemedicine for initial outpatient subspecialty consultative visits. To inform such strategies we performed a survey of general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists about use of telemedicine for patients newly referred for pediatric subspecialty care. METHODS: We developed and fielded an e-mail and postal survey of a national sample of 840 general pediatricians and 840 pediatric subspecialists in May and June 2020. RESULTS: Of 266 completed surveys (17% response rate), 204 (76%) thought telemedicine should be offered for some and 29 (11%) thought telemedicine should be offered for all initial subspecialist visits. Most respondents who indicated telemedicine should be offered for some initial consultations believed this decision should be made by subspecialty attendings (176/204, 86%). Respondents prioritized several data elements to inform this decision, including clinical information and family-based contextual information (e.g., barriers to in-person care, interest in telemedicine, potential communication barriers). Factors perceived to reduce appropriateness of telemedicine for subspecialty consultation included need for interpreter services and prior history of frequent no-shows. Responses from generalists and subspecialists rarely differed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Survey results suggest potential opportunities to support the appropriate use of telemedicine for initial outpatient pediatric subspecialty visits through structured transfer of specific clinical and contextual information at the time of referral and through strategies to mitigate perceived communication or engagement barriers. IMPLICATION: Pediatric physician beliefs about telemedicine for initial outpatient subspecialty consultative visits may inform future interventions to support appropriate telemedicine use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Survey of a national sample of clinicians.
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based strategies are needed to support appropriate use of telemedicine for initial outpatient subspecialty consultative visits. To inform such strategies we performed a survey of general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists about use of telemedicine for patients newly referred for pediatric subspecialty care. METHODS: We developed and fielded an e-mail and postal survey of a national sample of 840 general pediatricians and 840 pediatric subspecialists in May and June 2020. RESULTS: Of 266 completed surveys (17% response rate), 204 (76%) thought telemedicine should be offered for some and 29 (11%) thought telemedicine should be offered for all initial subspecialist visits. Most respondents who indicated telemedicine should be offered for some initial consultations believed this decision should be made by subspecialty attendings (176/204, 86%). Respondents prioritized several data elements to inform this decision, including clinical information and family-based contextual information (e.g., barriers to in-person care, interest in telemedicine, potential communication barriers). Factors perceived to reduce appropriateness of telemedicine for subspecialty consultation included need for interpreter services and prior history of frequent no-shows. Responses from generalists and subspecialists rarely differed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Survey results suggest potential opportunities to support the appropriate use of telemedicine for initial outpatient pediatric subspecialty visits through structured transfer of specific clinical and contextual information at the time of referral and through strategies to mitigate perceived communication or engagement barriers. IMPLICATION: Pediatric physician beliefs about telemedicine for initial outpatient subspecialty consultative visits may inform future interventions to support appropriate telemedicine use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Survey of a national sample of clinicians.
Authors: Navjit W Dullet; Estella M Geraghty; Taylor Kaufman; Jamie L Kissee; Jesse King; Madan Dharmar; Anthony C Smith; James P Marcin Journal: Value Health Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Christopher J Stille; Shira H Fischer; Nancy La Pelle; Beth Dworetzky; Kathleen M Mazor; W Carl Cooley Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2013-01-26 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Christopher Becket Mahnke; Christopher P Jordan; Ethan Bergvall; Donald A Person; Jordan E Pinsker Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2011-01-07 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Kristin N Ray; Laura Ellen Ashcraft; Ateev Mehrotra; Elizabeth Miller; Jeremy M Kahn Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Kelsey Schweiberger; Alejandro Hoberman; Jennifer Iagnemma; Pamela Schoemer; Joseph Squire; Jill Taormina; David Wolfson; Kristin N Ray Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Karen K Hoi; Stuart H Curtis; Lynn Driver; Erica Wisnosky; David A Zopf; Lauren A Bohm Journal: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 1.547
Authors: Natasha Shur; Shireen M Atabaki; Monisha S Kisling; Abir Tabarani; Clarence Williams; Jamie L Fraser; Debra S Regier; Marshall Summar Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2020-10-14 Impact factor: 2.802