| Literature DB >> 34875233 |
Yanxia Rao1, Siling Du2, Baozhi Yang3, Yuqing Wang3, Yuxin Li4, Ruofan Li5, Tian Zhou6, Xiangjuan Du4, Yang He4, Yafei Wang4, Xin Zhou4, Ti-Fei Yuan7, Ying Mao8, Bo Peng9.
Abstract
The regenerative capacity of neurons is limited in the central nervous system (CNS), with irreversible neuronal loss upon insult. In contrast, microglia exhibit extraordinary capacity for repopulation. Matsuda et al. (2019) recently reported NeuroD1-induced microglia-to-neuron conversion, aiming to provide an "unlimited" source to regenerate neurons. However, the extent to which NeuroD1 can exert cross-lineage reprogramming of microglia (myeloid lineage) to neurons (neuroectodermal lineage) is unclear. In this study, we unexpectedly found that NeuroD1 cannot convert microglia to neurons in mice. Instead, NeuroD1 expression induces microglial cell death. Moreover, lineage tracing reveals non-specific leakage of similar lentiviruses as previously used for microglia-to-neuron conversion, which confounds the microglia-to-neuron observation. In summary, we demonstrated that NeuroD1 cannot induce microglia-to-neuron cross-lineage reprogramming. We here propose rigid principles for verifying glia-to-neuron conversion. This Matters Arising paper is in response to Matsuda et al. (2019), published in Neuron.Entities:
Keywords: NeuroD1; artifact; cell death; cross-lineage; glia-to-neuron conversion; lineage tracing; microglia; regeneration; reprogramming; viral leakage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34875233 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.11.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuron ISSN: 0896-6273 Impact factor: 17.173