| Literature DB >> 34875079 |
E A Bacon1, H Kopsco1, P Gronemeyer1, N Mateus-Pinilla1, R L Smith1.
Abstract
The range of ticks in North America has been steadily increasing likely, in part, due to climate change. Along with it, there has been a rise in cases of tick-borne disease. Among those medically important tick species of particular concern are Ixodes scapularis Say (Acari: Ixodidae), Dermacentor variabilis Say (Acari: Ixodidae), and Amblyomma americanum Linneaus (Acari: Ixodidae). The aim of this study was to determine if climate factors explain existing differences in abundance of the three aforementioned tick species between two climatically different regions of Illinois (Central and Southern), and if climate variables impact each species differently. We used both zero-inflated regression approaches and Bayesian network analyses to assess relationships among environmental variables and tick abundance. Results suggested that the maximum average temperature and total precipitation are associated with differential impact on species abundance and that this difference varied by region. Results also reinforced a differential level of resistance to desiccation among these tick species. Our findings help to further define risk periods of tick exposure for the general public, and reinforce the importance of responding to each tick species differently.Entities:
Keywords: abundance; precipitation; temperature
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34875079 PMCID: PMC8924963 DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjab189
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Entomol ISSN: 0022-2585 Impact factor: 2.278
Fig. 1.Map of the study area indicating the sites where the active surveillance was conducted during 2018 and 2019 in the central and southern regions of the state of Illinois.
Model corrected Akaike Information Criteria (AICc) by species, lifestage, and region for ticks in Central and Southern Illinois
| Model | Dermacentor variabilis | Amblyomma americanum | Ixodes scapularis | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult | Nymph | Adult | Nymph | Adult | Nymph | |||||||
| Central | South | Central | South | Central | South | Central | South | Central | South | Central | South | |
| +Tmax | 194.42 | 261.99 |
| 31.52 |
| 246.39 | NA | 362.70 | 37.68 | 25.81 | NA | NA |
| +Tmax+VPmax +VPmin | NA |
| NA | 34.68 | NA | 233.96 | 147.26 | 358.50 | 47.26 | NA | NA | NA |
| +VPmin | 191.96 | 269.00 | 13.90 | 32.57 | 91.02 | 258.96 | 154.67 | 382.67 | 46.21 | 33.82 | 47.04 | 41.63 |
| +VPmax+VPmin | 192.99 | 252.35 | 15.87 | 34.65 | 92.35 | 249.31 | 149.49 | 363.85 | 43.47 | 98.26 | NA | NA |
| +Tmax+VPmin |
| 256.45 | 15.46 | 33.46 | NA | 250.94 | NA | 365.03 | 44.37 | 98.26 | NA | NA |
| +Precip | 201.74 | 268.54 | 13.92 |
| 90.88 | 236.76 | 163.70 | 378.69 | 34.71 | 37.01 |
|
|
| +Precip+Tmax | 191.32 | 246.51 | 15.08 | 28.97 | 90.00 |
| 160.43 | 359.78 |
| 100.28 | NA | NA |
| +Tmax+DP | 191.05 | 250.28 | 15.48 | 33.40 | 90.00 | 231.47 | 145.70 | 359.86 | 38.82 | 98.28 | NA | NA |
| +Tmax+DP+VPmax | 187.67 | 245.34 | NA | NA | NA | 229.75 | 145.31 | NA | 40.50 | NA | NA | NA |
| +Tmax+DP +VPmax+VPmin | NA | 240.06 | NA | NA | NA | 231.52 | NA | NA | 64.49 | NA | NA | NA |
| +DP | 198.86 | 253.50 | 13.43 | 31.16 | 90.25 | 234.23 | NA | 360.52 | 39.16 | 25.91 | NA | NA |
| +DP+VPmax | 189.94 | 247.51 | 15.64 | 33.31 | 90.16 | 233.50 | 146.60 | 357.84 | 39.10 | 98.33 | NA | NA |
| +DP+VPmax +VPmin | 184.35 | 240.04 | 18.02 | 35.62 | NA | 230.14 | 150.52 | 359.37 | 42.73 | NA | NA | NA |
| +VPmin | 191.40 | 250.50 | 13.60 | 32.51 | 92.45 | 244.17 | 151.86 | 358.84 | 34.65 |
| NA | NA |
| +Tmax+VPmin | 190.22 | 246.94 | NA | 32.34 | NA | 235.91 |
|
| 40.93 | 99.07 | NA | NA |
Monthly climate variables were Tmax (average daily maximum temperature), VPmax (average daily maximum vapor pressure deficit), VPmin (average daily minimum vapor pressure deficit), DP (average daily dew point), and Precip (total precipitation). NA: not applicable, model fit was not possible.
AICc from zero-inflated negative binomial models.
AICc from logistic regression models.
AICc from zero-inflated Poisson models.
Fig. 2.Observed number of ticks collected by region, timeframe, species, and life stage in Illinois in 2018 and 2019. To arrive at our tick counts, the median value of both adults and nymphs collected per day was found across collection sites per each county and time frame. Those values were then rounded to whole numbers.
Model coefficients for the best-fit models for tick abundance in Illinois by region, species, and lifestage using generalized linear models
| Species | Life-stage | Region | Intercept | Tmax | DP | VPmax | VPmin | Precip | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | Zeros | Count | Zeros | Count | Zeros | Count | Zeros | Count | Zeros | Count | Zeros | |||
|
| Adult | Central | −0.01 | 208.31 | 0.09 | −6.96 | −0.87 | −11.19 | ||||||
| South | 27.96 | 41.57 | −1.49 | −7.14 | 1.12 | 9.42 | −4.23 | −23.87 | ||||||
| Nymph | Central | −23.94 | 0.68 | |||||||||||
| South | −6.47 | 0.02 | ||||||||||||
|
| Adult | Central | −1.89 | 303.31 | 0.07 | −10.47 | ||||||||
| South | 2.96 | 441.83 | −0.08 | −12.87 | 0.01 | −0.62 | ||||||||
| Nymph | Central | −19.65 | 2.02 | 1.59 | 2.04 | −1.32 | −3.26 | |||||||
| South | −6.89 | 75.29 | 0.65 | −8.29 | −0.51 | 7.42 | ||||||||
|
| Adult | Central | 60.72 | 16.92 | 0.41 | −0.53 | −0.90 | −0.03 | ||||||
| South | 5.74 | 43.30 | 33.41 | −5.78 | −24.59 | 1.95 | 57.05 | 6.86 | ||||||
| Nymph | Central | 0.03 | 163.43 | 0.00 | −1.77 | |||||||||
| South | 1.36 | −1.65 | −0.01 | 0.01 | ||||||||||
Monthly climate variables were Tmax (average daily maximum temperature), DP (average daily dew point), VPmax (average daily maximum vapor pressure deficit), VPmin (average daily minimum vapor pressure deficit), and Precip (total precipitation).
Zero-inflated negative binomial models.
Logistic regression models.
Zero-inflated Poisson models.
Fig. 3.Best-fit Bayesian network model for observed tick abundance and climate in Illinois in 2018 and 2019. Gray solid lines indicate relationships with temporal and regional differences. Yellow dashed lines indicate relationships with weather variables.
Coefficients for the best-fit Bayesian network model for tick abundance in Illinois by region, species, and lifestage using generalized linear models
| Observed variable | Region | Intercept | Precipitation | Tmax | DP | VPmax | VPmin | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall | Summer | Fall | Summer | Fall | Summer | Fall | Summer | Fall | Summer | Fall | Summer | ||
| Precip | All | 92.5 | 152 | ||||||||||
| Tmax | All | 8.57 | 6.02 | 0.0084 | 0.0056 | 1.33 | 1.16 | −1.4 | 1.49 | ||||
| DP | Central | −5.01 | 19.4 | 0.028 | −7.83E-05 | 16.8 | −0.93 | ||||||
| South | 16.4 | 19.9 | −0.051 | −0.0051 | 2.24 | 0.40 | |||||||
| VPmax | Central | 0.053 | −25.5 | 0.017 | 0.00078 | 0.415 | 2.28 | 0.419 | −1.32 | −0.55 | 0.81 | ||
| South | −15.9 | −19.7 | −0.0044 | −0.00031 | 2.03 | 1.68 | −1.29 | −0.653 | −1.02 | 1.06 | |||
| VPmin | Central | 0.80 | 0.00084 | ||||||||||
| South | 0.77 | −0.00050 | |||||||||||
|
| All | 0.22 | |||||||||||
|
| All | 0.050 | |||||||||||
|
| All | 0.48 | 11.4 | ||||||||||
|
| All | 1.84 | 0.27 | −0.077 | −0.013 | ||||||||
|
| Central | −3.4 | 0.041 | 1.48 | |||||||||
| South | 15.1 | 0.028 | −19.44 | ||||||||||
|
| Central | −0.28 | 0.0065 | ||||||||||
| South | −0.41 | 0.031 | |||||||||||
Monthly climate variables were Tmax (average daily maximum temperature), DP (average daily dew point), VPmax (average daily maximum vapor pressure deficit), VPmin (average daily minimum vapor pressure deficit), and Precip (total precipitation).