How do gender disparities in entrepreneurial aspirations emerge in Pakistan? An approach to mediation and multi-group analysis.

This cross-sectional study sought to identify gender differences in individual behavioral attitudes, personal traits, and entrepreneurial education based on planned behavior theory. The Smart partial least squares (PLS) structural equation model and PLS path modeling were used. A survey design was used to collect data from 309 samples using quantitative measures. The model was tested for validity and reliability and showed variance (full, R2 = 58.9% and split, R2 = 62.7% and R2 = 52.7%) in male and female model predictive power, respectively. Subjective norms (SN), personality traits (PT), and entrepreneurial education (EE) significantly impacted the male sample's intention. Females' intentions toward entrepreneurship was less affected by attitude toward behavior (ATB), subjective norms (SN), perceived behavioral control (PBC), and entrepreneurship education (EE). Further, attitudes, social norms, and behavioral controls as mediation variables indicate a significant and positive role of male and female intentions. These findings imply that behavioral beliefs (ATB, PBC, and SN) influence entrepreneurial intention-action translation. The results significantly supported the designed hypotheses and shed light on individual personality traits (PT) and entrepreneurship education (EE) underpinning enterprise intention. The study determined that EE and PT are the strongest predictors of intention, thus highlighting the role of these motives in the entrepreneurial process. This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on youth entrepreneurs, expands our understanding of entrepreneurship as a practical career choice, and offers a novel account differentiating male and female PT. The drive to evaluate the effects of entrepreneurial intention among budding disparities in Pakistan requires a more profound knowledge of the aspects that endorse entrepreneurship as a choice of profession and enhances youth incentive abilities to engage in entrepreneurial activities based on exploitation.

Introduction

Entrepreneurship is critical for economic development and well-being. Entrepreneurs’ participation in a country’s economic growth is crucial because of their essential role in development [1]. Establishing enterprises has been sluggish in the Pakistani context and is essential for building a robust entrepreneurial environment for nascent entrepreneurs [2]. Usually, women face significant opposition when establishing their own business, which leads to the perception that considered as food provider instead of food creators [3]. As women encounter increasing obstacle to careers that pay, motivation and encouragement may enhance their performance in business intentions because they represent unexploited assets that can be used to improve a country’s economic prospects [4]. Some studies found that obtaining and using the enterprise economy relies on women’s entrepreneurship growth [2, 5]. As a result, start-up activity has increased owing to new ventures that meet unmet customer needs across the nation [6]. Nevertheless, universities and academia provide entrepreneurship opportunities, particularly fewer in the agricultural sector, since they make it possible for consumers to test and incubate new businesses and acquire entrepreneurial skills. The impact of the entrepreneurial class is seen in the mindsets of university students who see themselves as business owners [3].

Pakistan is an agrarian country and home to approximately 200 million people, with 6.14% youth unemployment [7]. However, poverty and unemployment are chronic problems and have become a great concern in Pakistan [3]. Agricultural students, in particular, endure challenging circumstances and face social, economic, environmental, and political non-compensation hitches [2, 7]. To promote an entrepreneurship environment for job creation and poverty alleviation problems in underdeveloped nations [3]. Prior research has shown that thousands of university graduates have joined the labor market every year. However, their employment requirements are not met by the market capacity [3, 8]. The increasing unemployment levels of educated individuals, particularly farm businesses, have become a great concern today [3]. It is a cause of fear for managers to deal with new jobs, particularly in Sindh/Pakistan [3, 9].

Despite the rapidly growing interest in entrepreneurial research in recent years, there is still a dearth of knowledge regarding entrepreneurship in transitioning emerging countries [10, 11] There are significant disparities between developing and established economies regarding institutional infrastructure, entrepreneurial education methods, and stringent regulatory frameworks [12]. The collectivistic culture of the nation distinguishes the setting from the majority of current research, which has been performed in western countries, as previously stated. entrepreneurship education (EE) in Pakistan is still in its infancy and has received little attention. Failure to recognize this diversity has significant implications for entrepreneurial policy and human development, especially about gender. The research is being performed in Pakistan, an entrepreneurial environment is favorable to job creation and poverty reduction in emerging nations such as Pakistan [3]. Despite increasing entrepreneurship research and a transition from ancient to modern businesses, there is still a dearth of evidence on how intentions and values emerge throughout entrepreneurial forms. However, Pakistan’s entrepreneurial environment remains unexplored. The nation continues to fall below peers in terms of young people’s proclivity for and retention of entrepreneurial activity, especially in the agriculture sector, which has not been investigated yet.

Thus, this paper treats the complexities of EE. Personality traits (PT) should be based on entrepreneurship theory and implemented in student-focused learning activities, setting the stage for a focus on student-oriented learning disparities if the students’ construction of entrepreneurship differs from the frames in Pakistan. The present research applies the theory of planned behavior’s (TPB) conceptual and intentional models to ascertain gender differences in entrepreneurship intention (EI) emerging in Pakistan. This cross-sectional study aimed to discover gender variations in individual PT, EE), and TPB antecedents. That is, attitude toward behavior (ATB), subjective norms (SN), and perceived behavioral control (PBC), serve as mediator indicators among male and female aspirants. The Smart PLS structural equation model (SEM) and partial least square path modeling were used.

Theory-based framework and hypotheses development

The theory of planned behavior was first created to represent the connection between an individual’s attitude toward a specific action and the actual behavior [13]. According to the TBP, intentions serve as a link between attitudes and behaviors. TPB reflects variables such as the desire for entrepreneurship (personal attitude), the social acceptability of entrepreneurship to a normative reference group (subjective norms), and the perceived feasibility and control of becoming an entrepreneur (perceived behavioral control). Understanding individual decision-making is critical in fostering an entrepreneurial spirit; the TPB recognizes an insatiable intention to engage in an activity as an instant antecedent [13]. As summarized by the TPB, individuals will participate in a behavior if they want to do so, have the opportunity and resources, assess it favorably, believe others think they should engage in it, and feel it is within their control [13].

Entrepreneurial intention

Entrepreneurial intention (EI) is crucial in the entrepreneurial process because it lays the groundwork for effective entrepreneurial activities [14]. However, establishing a new business is a lengthy and complicated process that involves many mediating factors [15]. Several significant theoretical breakthroughs have been made in understanding the new entrepreneurial process [16]. Whereas the study of [17] found that intentions and behaviors influence real behavior. However although an individual’s willingness to participate in entrepreneurial activity is influenced by three distinct attitudinal domains, each of which is focused on action [18] and according to the concept of planned behavior, one must first believe in oneself to change behavior [13, 19, 20],examine their willingness to take risky actions when establishing a new business or entrepreneurial activity by determining whether they express a belief that the behaviors are accurate and actionable.

Thus, entrepreneurship is a course of action that is influenced by an individual’s personality. TPB shows that the more the individuals are willing to do the activity in question, the more favorable the attitude and subjective norm, and the greater the perceived behavioral control when people are given a sufficient degree of real influence over the behaviors of legitimate entrepreneurial careers. They are expected to pursue them [21] and [22] shows that entrepreneurial intentions are positively influenced by personal attitude and perceived behavioral control but not by subjective norms. The relationship between personal attitudes and social norms and intentions, but not between perceived behavioral control and choices validated by [23].

Attitude toward behavior

Attitude and behavior denote the extent to which a person has a positive or disadvantageous assessment or appreciation of the action [13]. Personal desirability is the value placed on an entrepreneur’s potential for significant professional achievement. In the context of entrepreneurship, attitude toward self-employment has been described as “the difference in views of personal attractiveness in being self-starting versus organizationally employed [24]. According to [19], an attitude toward start-up is the degree to which an individual has a favorable or negative personal value of becoming an entrepreneur; according to a prior study, ATB is the leading factor, including the aspirations of an entrepreneurial profession [15, 25]. Consequently, the strong connection between ATB and EIs is agreed upon in the context of the TPB [26-28] found that male fledgling entrepreneurs regarded financial success and innovation as more important professional motivations for entrepreneurship than non-entrepreneurs. According to [29], women put a greater premium on non-wage elements of self-employment than men do, and [30] found that women are more receptive to entrepreneurship as a replacement for part-time labor. According to [31], women become entrepreneurs to balance job and family obligations, while men pursue wealth creation or economic growth.

Subjective norm

Subjective norms reflect normative views regarding entrepreneurship as a career option weighted by a desire to conform to these normative beliefs [23] discovered a substantial but insignificant effect of subjective norms on entrepreneurial aspirations. [32] suggested that this abysmal connection may be ascribed to a few people whose behavior is mainly motivated by perceived social pressure. [33] argue that in certain circumstances, females may be more influenced by societal forces than males. Positive role models, according to [34], have a greater influence on female career choices in a male-dominated discipline, such as engineering. Subjective norms are often shown to be poor predictors of TPB models [35]. The research showed that SN is important in altering EIs and was insignificant [22, 36, 37]. According to prior research, we anticipate that women will be more receptive to conforming to normative referents than their male counterparts. Researchers suppose that men and women have the same normative view of important people, but women will be more driven to comply with these referents.

Perceived behavioral control

Perceived behavioral control is a function of the significance weighted by the power of control beliefs toward establishing an enterprise. The PBC notion, originally presented by Ajzen [13] as another antecedent component that may predict intention, was described as a person’s impression of the ease or difficulty of doing the action of interest. Initially, [38] conceptualized PBC as a one-dimensional structure almost comparable to a social self-effectual learning structure and evaluation of an individual’s ability to act necessary for the future. Numerous researchers have replaced PBC with self-efficacy with the idea that PBC and independence are fundamentally comparable building blocks [23, 39, 40]. This implies personal conviction in designing, implementing, and managing people’s conduct [13]. Individuals need to explain whether the entrepreneurial activity is comfortable or not [31, 41]. There were significant gender variations in the behavioral control emotions. According to [42] women’s tendency to establish new companies is linked to awareness of current possibilities and self-assessment of ability and expertise. [41] discovered that women scored lower on entrepreneurial aspirations and internal control measures problem solving, decision making, money management, creativity, consensus building, and leadership. While external control beliefs, an individual might perceive financial resources as necessary to start a business [43]. We predict that prospective female entrepreneurs would place a premium on internal control feelings such as knowledge, the capacity to identify possibilities, and creativity when assessing the feasibility of becoming an entrepreneur.

We define the following hypothesis in line with the TPB framework:

H1: TPB components (a) ATB, (b) SN, and (c) PBC will have a significant positive impact on entrepreneurial intention (EI)

Application of EE to TPB

EE helps customers develop entrepreneurial abilities, talents, and a broad range of professional skills [44]. Previous research has demonstrated that EI effectively inspires people to undertake an entrepreneurial career on purpose, convert into entrepreneurial behavior, and achieve better entrepreneurship. [33] indicated that they had become entrepreneurs within 10 years of graduating from an entrepreneurship course. However, TPB provides such a proxy to evaluate and minimize the problems [40] proposed using the measured probability of company start-up as a proxy for educational benefits. It reflects a person’s high probability of starting a company as an actual action to adhere to their goal [45]. Thus, by the TPB’s three domains, entrepreneurial education determines an individual’s entrepreneurial intention. As a result, the following hypotheses were developed:

EE has a significant positive impact on (a) ATB, (b) SN, (c) PBC, and (d) EI.

Application of personality traits to TPB

The TPB is an appropriate theoretical measurement instrument to investigate the effects of many factors, such as individual skills and personality characteristics, on EI precedents [46-48]. Personality traits (PT) are significant variances and significantly impact individuals who become self-employed [49, 50], distinguishing between entrepreneurs, and non-entrepreneurs [50, 51] with regard to the effects of PT on EI. The study of [40, 42] discussed risk propensity, ambiguity, and self-effectiveness tolerance [50, 52]. However, [14, 53] also assessed entrepreneurial passion, inventiveness, passion, and proactive personalities. Some studies [27, 54] verified the characteristics described as a particular characteristic of professional choices, called entrepreneurial qualities. These traits significantly impact corporate culture and EI [55], as a precedent for TPBs, indirectly explaining EIs. The direct and indirect relationship between individual traits and TPB dimensions continues to be unilateral [6, 56]. Following the processes outlined by career choice and the concept of internal and social adaptation, we expect that individuals will be attracted to entrepreneurship through an intimate connection between their personalities and the requirements of an enterprise. [6]. Therefore, the following hypothesis is developed:

PT will have a significant positive effect on (a) ATB, (b) SN, (c) PBC, and (d) EIs.

Mediation effects of the theory of planned behavior

The TPB antecedents have been employed as intermediates in numerous studies investigating cultural, psychological, and socio-economic factors [57, 58]. There is also an indirect relationship between personality and characteristics of entrepreneurial conduct mediated via numerous aspects, including attitudes and intentions [39, 59]. The business process is challenging to understand based on personality characteristics. A necessary explanation is given by understanding this process and the enabling function of the TPB and EE. Business intentions [16]. Previous research has shown how TPBs can predict characteristics, enterprise training, and entrepreneurship [10, 20]. Independent research on PT, EE, and TPB in the exercise area has been conducted. Consequently, it is unknown whether the relationship between personality and exercise behavior is mediated by social-cognitive conceptions, such as the TPB postulates depicted in Fig 1. Thus, the propositions may be formulated as

Fig 1

Study analytic framework extended theory of planned behavior.

There will be a significant positive impact of (a) EE, (b) PT, on EIs mediated by ATB.

There is a significant positive impact of (a) EE, (b) PT, on EIs mediated by the SN.

There will be a significant positive impact of (a) EE, (b) PT, on EIs mediated by PBC.

Gender gaps in entrepreneurial environments

According to gender perspectives on entrepreneurship, women are less likely than men to prefer traditionally male-dominated occupations, owing to women’s tendency to have lower self-efficacy perceptions regarding entrepreneurial career intentions and beliefs about social gender differences in personality and behavior. However, there are persistent gender disparities in entrepreneurship and self-employment worldwide [60]. Even though this is a significant problem, women’s lower entrepreneurial activity inclinations are not well understood [61]. According to [61, 62], men are considered to be more entrepreneurially inclined. Nevertheless, [63] findings do not offer evidence but examine gender stereotypes, gender roles, and discrimination in market access are explained by various contextual variables [64]. According to [3, 27], women have a lower entrepreneurial inclination and trust in company skills, social network features, and a greater fear of failure. However, [65] believes that there is a link the intangible character of female entrepreneurs’ credibility; it must be taken more seriously. However, the studies of [6, 66] revealed that women entrepreneurs in Pakistan do not have the same chances as men because of deeply ingrained discriminatory societal and cultural norms in support systems that assist these budding businesspeople. Women are most equipped to be homemakers in a male-dominated culture, which presents tremendous difficulties [6, 66]. Thus, male households seldom support female households, resulting in restricted regional agility, a lack of social capital, and gender disparities in entrepreneurship and venture potential among men and women [61, 62, 67]. Given the proposed model for the test in both gender groups, the hypothesis is as follows:

H7. In Pakistan, the effects of EE and PT are attributed to differences between men and women in the extent of the TPBs a) {ATB, SN, and PBC} on EIs.

Material and methods

Participant consent and ethical consideration

Before data collection, ethical approval and consent were obtained from the College of Economics Research Ethics Committee (Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu Campus, China). Additionally, all the eligible respondents of both the survey and interview participants were informed about the study’s aims, voluntary participation, and the right to withdraw at any time without giving a reason. They were assured that the information to be collected would be kept confidential and that the research would purely be used for academic purposes. The consent statement was included in writing on dummy-coded variables and the Likert Scale for the survey and for the interview protocols. During qualitative data collection, the researcher verbally shared the aims and objectives of the study with the participants in English.

Target population

We conducted the study on 400 graduate students from Pakistan’s four most prominent universities. Our selection of a simple random sampling strategy based on population-restricted agribusiness students’ context’s distinctive gender inequalities in entrepreneurship. We selected students interested in business who were about to make a career decision to ensure that the entrepreneurial aspirations construct included sufficient variance [22] to support the validity of the questionnaire based on the measurement techniques already used and verified [68]. In turn, the author performed pre-survey testing on 30 respondents to confirm that the questions were intelligible and reliable in this study. Some issues have been relocated and modified to simplify the research.

Data collection procedure and participants

A total of 400 questionnaires were sent out, and 350 were returned, resulting in 309 valid questionnaires and a response rate of 77.25%; the study comprised participants from various agricultural sectors, with 184 males (60%) and 125 females (40%) participated in this study. When asked about the entrepreneurial intention EI, N = 65.4% responded “yes” and N = 34.6% replied with “no” intention in business start-ups. Although 62.5% said “yes” regarding the PEK factor, and 37.5% had no prior entrepreneurial knowledge, when enquired about prior entrepreneurial exposure PEX, approximately 57% answered “yes”, and about 43% argued that they have no such exposure regarding business. Similarly, when asked about prior farming exposure PFE and prior entrepreneurial exposure PEE, approximately 64% had farm exposure, and 29.4% only show no farming experience in the line with almost 58% said that they have parental entrepreneurial exposure whereas almost 37% revealed that do not have any parental entrepreneurial exposure (see Table 1).

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of the respondents.

Variable distribution		(N)	(% age)	(M)	(STDEV)	Total
Gender	Male	184	59.5	0.60	0.492	309
	Female	125	39.5
Entrepreneurial Intention (EI)	Yes	202	65.4	0.65	0.477	309
	No	107	34.6
Prior Entrepreneurial Knowledge (PEK)	Yes	193	62.5	0.62	0.485	309
	No	116	37.5
Parental Entrepreneurial Exposure (PEX)	Yes	175	56.6	0.57	0.496	309
	No	134	43.4
Prior Entrepreneurial Exposure (PEE)	Yes	179	57.9	0.58	0.494	309
	No	113	36.6
Prior Farming Exposure (PFE)	Yes	196	63.4	0.63	0.482	309
	No	75	29.4

Note: (N) = Number of samples, (% age) = Percentage (M) = Means, (STDEV) = Standard Deviation.

Measures of sample constructs

The questionnaire used in this research was rated on a 5-point Likert scale and was adapted from prior literature related to the TPB. The degree of agreement ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Constructs of EI and PBC were assessed using five items derived from [19]. They used five questions to determine attitudes toward behavior (ATB), including four items of the SN scale, which was used for measurements drawn from [23]. Finally, EE was evaluated using five items, and PTs were measured using five questions adapted from [48].

Control variables

Entrepreneurial intention (EI) has been linked to various control factors [19]. Dummy-coded variables (0 = female; 1 = male) and (1 = yes; 0 = no) were used for EI, prior entrepreneurial knowledge (PEK), parental entrepreneurial exposure (PEX), prior entrepreneurial exposure (PEE), and prior farming exposure entrepreneurial intention (EI), prior entrepreneurial knowledge (PEK), parental entrepreneurial exposure (PEX), and prior entrepreneurial exposure (PFE) to determine gender disparities in entrepreneurial action and inclinations which also have been confirmed by the study of [69].

Data analysis

The authors used statistical package for social sciences (SPSS- 25) and Smart PLS-3 to analyze data. The structural equation model (SEM) is an accurate method used to evaluate social, behavioral, and agricultural sciences to validate the connection of model variables [70] empirically. The adoption of this model comprises many continuous and preparatory phases, including a description of the theoretical model to be tested, parameter estimates, and assessments. The reflective measurement model was evaluated using two sets of criteria. The first set of item criteria was principal component factor loading reliability >0.5, based on convergent validity of Cronbach’s alpha (CA) >0.7, composite reliability (CR)>0.708, and average variance of the extraction (AVE)>0.5. The second set is discriminant validity, AVE > exogenous item correlation values [70]. If all evaluation conditions are met, the Smart-PLS3 algorithm and iterations are alternatively performed. In this model, six iterations and procedures for assessment were included, and the outcome was that two indicators were deleted in each construct/group with a low factor load (<0.4) and that the average variance (AVE) errors extracted were improved to an acceptable level.

Results

Descriptive statistics of demographic sample characteristics

Descriptive analysis is critical in an all-inclusive view of data analysis. It allows researchers to understand the essential data dimensions, including the mean and standard deviation, as shown in Table 1. The participants’ exposure was coded into male (n = 184) and female (n = 125) dichotomous responses of gender (M = 0.60; S. D = 0.482). Regarding entrepreneurial intention (M = 0.65; S. D = 0.477), prior farming exposure with (M = 0.63; S. D = 0.482) and prior entrepreneurial knowledge (M = 0.62; S. D = 0.485) revealed the highest mean and standard deviation, respectively. However, previous entrepreneurial exposure (M = 0.58; S. D = 0.494) and parental entrepreneurial orientation (M = 0.57; S. D = 0.496) revealed the lowest mean and standard deviation for the student’s sample.

Validity and reliability results

In the whole research sample, the overall construct EI, loaded with 4-items, exhibited composite reliability (CR = 0.87), average variance extraction (AVE = 0.63), and CA = 0.80. However, the attitude toward behavior was evaluated with three questions, yielding an AVE = 0.68 and composite reliability of (0.87) in the entire sample, including a Cronbach’s alpha (CA) = 0.76. As a result, the subjective norm constructs were loaded with three items, resulting in CA = 0.61 and AVE = 0.54. According to [71], if the value of AVE is often too stringent, composite reliability (CR) alone may demonstrate the reliability of the model. As a result, the composite reliability of SN = 0.76 for the entire sample, and the perceived behavioral control constructs were loaded with three items, with construct reliability of 0.82. The AVE was 0.61, with a CA = 0.69 for the entire sample. As a result, the individual personality characteristics loaded with three items had a composite reliability of 0.83, an AVE = 0.63, and a CA = 0.70 in the whole sample. Similarly, entrepreneurial education constructs loaded with 3-items and evaluating the highest CR = 0.88, AVE = 0.71, and CA = 0.81 of the respondents’ entrepreneurial intention are presented for the whole sample in Table 2.

Table 2

Constructs reliability and validity test measurement.

Constructs	Items	FL	CA	rho_A	(CR)	(AVE)
Entrepreneurial Intention (EI)	EI1	0.821	0.804	0.807	0.872	0.63
	EI2	0.836
	EI3	0.863
	EI4	0.750
Attitude Toward Behavior (ATB)	ATB1	0.718	0.761	0.782	0.865	0.683
	ATB2	0.829
	ATB3	0.920
Subjective Norm (SN)	SN1	0.791	0.609	0.627	0.776	0.537
	SN2	0.686
	SN3	0.718
Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC)	PBC1	0.739	0.689	0.703	0.824	0.610
	PBC2	0.816
	PBC3	0.786
Personality Traits (PT)	PT1	0.828	0.702	0.704	0.834	0.627
	PT2	0.797
	PT3	0.749
Entrepreneurial Education (EE)	EE1	0.821	0.813	0.923	0.878	0.706
	EE2	0.836
	EE3	0.863

Notes: FL = Factor Loadings; CA = Cronbach Alpha CR = Composite Reliability; AVE = Average Variance Extraction.

The goodness-of-fit index test demonstrates that the equal constraint of specific structural parameters is continuously liberated, and the fitting effect of the overall model is retested [70]. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria vs. novel alternatives support chi-square (617.454), CFI (0.93), and SRMR cutoff measures (0.07).

Discriminant validity criterion

Following each variable’s validation and reliability testing, a PLS (SEM) was used to investigate the concurrent existence relations while considering variables affecting intention to the resultant of PLS (SEM). It was verified that the route coefficients for the set of criteria have discriminant validity. The Fornell-Lacker criterion assessment compares the square root of the AVE to exogenous construction associations [72]. The findings of the squared correlation criteria and discriminant validity are presented in Table 3.

Table 3

Measurement of Squared Correlation and Discriminant Validity.

Constructs	(ATB)	(EE)	(EI)	(PBC)	(PT)	(SN)
Attitude Toward Behavior (ATB)	0.826
Entrepreneurial Education (EE)	0.288	0.840
Entrepreneurial Intention (EI)	0.501	0.476	0.794
Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC)	0.745	0.347	0.561	0.781
Personality Traits (PT)	0.555	0.287	0.696	0.697	0.792
Subjective Norm (SN)	0.554	0.403	0.574	0.558	0.569	0.733

Diagonal values represent the square root of AVE.

Table 3 shows that exogenous factors such as ATB, PBC, SN, EE, and PT. The square root value of AVE is more important than other correlation values with external constructs and is believed to be adequate for establishing discriminant validity [73]. However, the square root values of the ATB and EE constructions were more significant than the PT, PBC, and EI values, with minor variations can be found in the extracted results. The overall discriminant validity of the model is well established, with substantial variations in the AVE’s square root endured [70].

Structural equation model measurement

PLS-SEM was used to verify the hypothetical model’s accuracy and validate the structural equation measurement, and 2000 subsamples were bootstrapped. These connections were explained using bootstrap methods and t-statistics. The path coefficient and determinant coefficient (R2) were discussed extensively. H1(a, b, c), H2(a, b, c), and H3(a, b, c) structural model path coefficients were assessed (see Fig 2 and Table 4). Tables 5–7 provide the mediation study of specific indirect and total indirect effects represented by bootstrapping techniques to testify the suggested H4 (a,b), H5 (a,b), and H6 (a, and b) of male and female samples, respectively. To investigate the hypothesis of H7 in Table 8, the authors utilized multi-group analysis (MGA) to examine the non-statistical hypothetical paths between the male and female models. Consequently, the findings showed that our study model parameters were equal among both groups, and no gender disparities were discovered. The results also showed that the variances were related to the observed heterogeneity. There may be non-observed heterogeneity; therefore, these heterogeneities are unlikely to influence any of the pre-specified variables [74].

Fig 2

PLS-SEM Co-efficient path model estimation.

Table 4

Estimates of Path Co-efficient in a Model.

Relationships	Male	Female	Full Sample	t- Statistics	p-Value	Hypotheses
Entrepreneurial Intention
ATB→EI	0.054	0.145	0.083	0.991	0.322	H1a
SN→EI	0.171	0.135	0.146	2.181	0.029 *	H1b
PBC→EI	0.026	-0.100	-0.035	0.384	0.701	H1c
Entrepreneurial Education
EE→ATB	0.209	0.084	0.138	2.854	0.004**	H2a
EE→SN	0.277	0.120	0.235	3.652	0.000***	H2b
EE→PBC	0.171	0.230	0.159	3.796	0.000***	H2c
EE→EI	0.303	0.216	0.299	6.763	0.000**	H2d
Personality Traits
PT→ATB	0.540	0.494	0.516	11.011	0.000***	H3a
PT→SN	0.510	0.552	0.504	9.534	0.000***	H3b
PT→PBC	0.666	0.590	0.654	17.752	0.000***	H3c
PT→EI	0.656	0.584	0.612	17.508	0.000***	H3d

Notes: Sig

† p < 0.100

* p < 0.050

** p < 0.010

*** p < 0.001 and n.s.* non-significant.

Table 5

Structural specific indirect effects of the female sample.

Relationships	Coefficients (β)	Lower Threshold	Upper Threshold	t- Statistics	p-Value	Annotation
EE→ATB→EI	0.012	-0.012	0.063	0.618	0.536	H4a
PT→ATB→EI	0.072	-0.027	0.182	1.323	0.186	H4b
EE→SN→EI	0.016	-0.026	0.062	0.757	0.449	H5a
PT→SN→EI	0.074	-0.035	0.206	1.211	0.226	H5b
EE→PBC→EI	-0.023	-0.092	0.044	0.681	0.496	H6a
PT→PBC→EI	-0.059	-0.208	0.125	0.698	0.485	H6b

Note: p- value is significant at the < 0.05. or

*p < 0.05

**p < 0.01and

***p = 0.001, Direct effects and Indirect effects: Bootstrapping: 2000 iterations and 0.95 bias-corrected.

Table 7

Total indirect effects Male vs. Female.

Female				Male
Relationships	Coefficients (β)	t- Statistics	p-Value	Coefficients (β)	t- Statistics	p-Value
EE→EI	0.005	0.142	0.887	0.063	2.177	0.030**
PT→EI	0.087	1.496	0.135	0.133	2.270	0.023**

Note: p- value is significant at the < 0.05. or

*p < 0.05

**p < 0.01and

***p = 0.001, Indirect effects: Bootstrapping: 2000 iterations and 0.95 bias-corrected.

Table 8

Multi-group parametric test difference Male vs. Female.

Constructs	Path Coefficient-diff	t-Value	p-Value
ATB -> EI	0.084	0.531	0.710
EE -> ATB	0.128	1.239	0.117
EE -> EI	0.032	0.340	0.382
EE -> PBC	0.055	0.594	0.724
EE -> SN	0.149	1.294	0.104
PBC -> EI	0.110	0.649	0.258
PT -> ATB	0.045	0.455	0.332
PT -> EI	0.033	0.285	0.392
PT -> PBC	0.072	0.879	0.192
PT -> SN	0.035	0.357	0.638
SN -> EI	0.033	0.255	0.401

Note: p-values <0.05 or > 0.95 show significant differences across the two samples.

Hypothesis testing

A bootstrapping method was used to verify the proposed hypotheses and the significance of the projected correlation between the TPB antecedents and EE and PT on EIs (i.e., H1, H2, and H3), with 2,000 sub-sample relationship values and their significance level, considered in PLS-SEM analysis and the variance explanation [50]. Table 4, Figs 2 and 3 show the significant findings of each predicted connection.

Fig 3

PLS-SEM bootstrapping model significant estimation.

The explained variance of the whole model, reflecting the EI R2 = 59% for the total sample, ATB 33%, SN 39%, and PBC 51%, explained TPBs’ three aspects of variation on the entrepreneurship intentions of respondents. The primary goal of statistical analysis was to differentiate between the two sub-samples. As a result, SN demonstrated a positive and substantial level in enlightening EI about H1, while social norm components support H1b* only in the overall model; there is no significant difference between men and women.

The detection of H2 and EE showed a pledging effect of TPB dimensions; its impact on EI was favorable across all mediation factors. It has a good outcome, and its coefficient is both positive and significant for the agricultural student sample in terms of entrepreneurial intentions. Thus, H2a**, H2b***, H2c***, and H2d*** are supported.

Comparably, the favorable effect of personality behaviors on the three TPB dimensions and EI findings indicated that H3a***, H3b***, H3c***, and H3d*** are significant across all samples. Individual attitudes, perceived control behavior, and social norms played a crucial role in developing unique personalities and entrepreneurial indication, indicating that their relationship positively influenced and depicted a significant association; thus, all proposed hypotheses are supported. While gender was used as a control variable to determine the effect on EI in the agrarian sector, both gender groups were significantly impacted and linked in all samples, as shown in Tables 5–7.

Analysis of meditation effects

Mediation impacts its three categories: indirect mediation, direct non-mediation only and, no non-mediation effect; complementary mediations and partial mediation were described as criteria utilized the method of [48] also regulated the mediation type as complete mediation and in partial mediation and complementary mediation only [50].

To assess the mediation paths function of the three antecedents of TPBs, namely ATB, SN, and PBC, considering extended factors as entrepreneurial education and personalities traits to predict the entrepreneurship intentions. The mediation analysis to test H5–H6 showed that subjective norms directly affect EIs were positively mediated in the paths of EE →SN →EI and PT →SN →EI in the total sample, and the approaches of EE →SN →EI resulted in a significant and positive mediation role in the male model only. According to [50], bootstrapping with 2,000 sub-samples for the whole sample revealed the specific indirect and total outcome effects in Table 6. Hence, H5a* and H5b* are also supported in this study. To investigate each direct path’s significance value and the principal function of an individually mediating variable in predicting the influence of EE and PT on EI, the variations and type of mediation can be perceived in the whole sample (see Tables 6 and 7). Both indirect and direct effects were substantial. However, they showed partial mediation results on EI. The paths direct and indirect effects are calculated to assess the nature of partial mediation followed by [75]; if the product’s symbol is positive, a partial complementary intermediary is achieved [50].

Table 6

Structural specific indirect effects of the male sample.

Relationships	Coefficients (β)	Lower Threshold	Upper Threshold	t- Statistics	p-Value	Annotation
EE→ATB→EI	0.011	-0.038	0.063	0.454	0.650	H4a
PT→ATB→EI	0.029	-0.077	0.163	0.478	0.633	H4b
EE→SN→EI	0.047	0.003	0.099	2.040	0.041*	H5a
PT→SN→EI	0.087	0.006	0.192	1.812	0.070	H5b
EE→PBC→EI	0.004	-0.040	0.041	0.219	0.826	H6a
PT→PBC→EI	0.017	-0.135	0.159	0.228	0.820	H6b

Note: p- value is significant at the < 0.05. or

*p < 0.05

**p < 0.01and

***p = 0.001, Direct effects and Indirect effects: Bootstrapping: 2000 iterations and 0.95 bias-corrected.

Concerning H4, the TPB (ATB) dimension mediated the relationship between EE, PT, and EIs. For example, ATB mediated paths for EE-PT relationships on EIs nevertheless exhibited significant impacts on enterprise intention. In contrast, SN mediated and demonstrated a strong effect of EE and PT on EI in the male sample, directly or indirectly explaining EI via SN. Thus, H5a and H5b demonstrated significant results and support for the entire model. ATB mediated from PT to EI, although in both male and female samples, it is not to accept H4a and H4b in the complete and split data sets.

The PBC mediation paths function also impacted EE and PT with regard to adopting EIs in H6. The whole sample does not have a mediatory impact on EE and EI, as the male and female models do not support H6a and H6b shown in Table 7. and no mediation with a positive sign has been seen regarding the H6a connection between EE and EI, where PT and EIs discovered the interposition in the total indirect effects of non-supportive relationships to H6a, and H6b does not accept the whole sample in this study.

Multi-group analysis

PLS-MGA is used in conjunction with Henseler’s MGA and the permutation technique to determine the difference between groups. PLS-MGA includes the validation of dimension invariance across the two groups, using all non-parametric utilized variables. However, the PLS-MGA output showed significant variations in the impact of ATB, PBC, and SN on EI (H5) between males and females at significance levels of 0.05 and 0.01, respectively (Tables 8 and 9). Our study result confirms the existence of a substantial difference in the impact of PT and EE on EI between males and females.

Table 9

Permutation test for measuring invariance.

Compositional Invariance C = 1						Equal Mean Assessment					Equal Variance Assessment
Items	(CI)	C = 1	P- Mean	5% c	p-Values	Partial (MI) Established	Mean Difference	2.5%	97.5%	p-Values	Variance Difference	2.5%	97.5%	p-Values	Full (MI) Established
ATB	Yes	0.997	0.997	0.991	0.308	No	0.134	-0.215	0.229	0.240	0.302	-0.26	0.269	0.024	No
EE	Yes	0.994	0.994	0.978	0.300	No	-0.566	-0.223	0.23		0.349	-0.26	0.272	0.011	No
EI	Yes	0.998	0.999	0.997	0.144	No	-0.358	-0.223	0.231	0.000	0.365	-0.33	0.329	0.031	yes
PBC	Yes	0.997	0.997	0.989	0.438	Yes	0.065	-0.226	0.232	0.570	0.131	-0.26	0.284	0.348	yes
PT	Yes	1.000	0.999	0.997	0.750	Yes	-0.044	-0.218	0.229	0.710	0.184	-0.28	0.31	0.222	yes
SN	Yes	0.997	0.99	0.966	0.648	Yes	0.060	-0.222	0.226	0.610	0.153	-0.26	0.27	0.266	yes

Note: Configure Invariance = (CI) measure invariance = (MI), Correlation = (C).

According to [70, 72], the composite model invariance (MICOM) used in PLS-MGA has been assessed to validate and the findings of this research were established in both steps and showed measurement invariance [70]. The structural and PLS algorithms were similar for both samples, confirming the specified invariance. For compositional invariances, an empirical distribution permutation method with a sampling level of a minimum of 5,000 permutations after a permutation process (Cu) at 0.05 is used; the original score correlation c and the correlations obtained by that method can be used to determine compositional invariances when c exceeds 5% of Cu [70, 72]. Both Henseler’s MGA and the permutation technique verified the significance/non-significance of the results differences, which strengthened the conclusions of the study. The primary purpose of the multi-group analyses was to validate H7 on whether the connection of TPB dimensions with business intent would be highly inclusive of two examples: PT on EIs. MGA was performed to evaluate the difference between these two instances to determine whether the constructs were statistically significant. The uniqueness of this research is seen in Table 8; the paths across both groups are not found to be significantly different. Overall, statistically significant differences between males and females were observed in the multi-group results. Thus, H7 is supported in this study.

Discussion

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate an inclusive context for TPB antecedents to predict EI and determine the degree to which individuals want to be self-efficient among Pakistani respondents. Research has focused on the critical role of the TPB’s mediation of attitudinal beliefs, that is, ATB, PBC, and SN via education, and personal traits, in general, which were explored through gender differences in entrepreneurship [6, 66].

Our study results showed intriguing structural connections regarding the relative significance of ATB, PBC, and SN components in predicting intention components. The direct and mediation effects between the variables included in the validated structural model indicate that the TPB dimensions are related to the intended dimensions in a unique manner. The findings show that the impacts of SN, EE, and PT were the most significant predictors of intention in terms of total effects, followed by ATB and PBC, which had the most negligible impact on intention. These findings emphasize the critical nature of disentangling the components of attitudes, PBC, and SN. This enables us to investigate whether each element of these variables is associated with entrepreneurial ambition differently. The study’s findings showed that the model predicted the effect on EIs in a manner that was consistent with prior research [6, 66]. Therefore, the TPB’s predictive ability was acknowledged in a previous study [2, 36, 76]. In terms of the impact of SN dimensions on intention dimensions, the majority of prior research indicates that ATB and PBC are better predictors of intent [13, 77]. Conversely, in our analysis, ATB and PBC revealed weak predictions of male and female intentions.

However, the intensity of EIs varies by country; the TPB model’s extrapolative power is higher in an emerging economy context, demonstrating stronger EIs, consistent with the [2, 78] discovered significant differences while determining the role of EIs between men and women in Pakistan. The mediation effects of TPB antecedents on gender showed that all except one of the intention variables were gender invariant. Males were more likely than females to be committed to new business ventures. In line with [78], this finding indicates that women are less likely than men to act on their entrepreneurial intentions.

The current study aimed to assess the effects of EE and PT on TPB domains and EIs, either directly or indirectly. The study highlighted the importance of personality and EE in determining creative career and business stimulation among young entrepreneurs [2, 79], verifying the reputation of individual character in entrepreneurial entrance and endurance [6, 80], and clarifying environmental factors and their significance [47]. In our study influence of personality traits mediated by TPB as antecedents was examined favorably significant [6, 81, 82] also discovered significant variations in the paths coefficients among students who indicated more futuristic entrepreneurial desire.

Entrepreneurial education had a more significant effect on TPB dimensions among participants solely concerning intentions. These results show that expanded TPBs have a substantial impact on business behavior. However, in developing nations [6, 80], they acknowledged that personality and enterprise training go beyond describing personality features in their job choices and decision-making. The distinctive PT are based on the sample’s environmental, familial, and socio-economic disparities under examination; the mediation findings directly or indirectly affect the intentions [50]. The results also indicate that a gender view of entrepreneurship may be derived from gender preconceptions, given that men and women use different sources of support [6, 61]. The mainstream media and educators may provide additional information regarding entrepreneurship to the gender-neutral features of women and men [61]. The training and education of companies should also be customized to address the requirements of entrepreneurs, men, and women to assist entrepreneurs.

Conclusion and recommendations

The present study investigates EI using conceptual and intentional models from the TPB and adopts an SEM approach. This cross-sectional study examined the network of relations among gender differences in individual PT, EE, and within the TPB antecedents, specifically ATB, SN, and PBC, and male and female aspirants’ entrepreneurial intentions in Pakistan. The hypothesized model was tested using a multi-group structural equation analysis. The dimensions of the TPB constructs were disentangled and treated as latent variables that were, directly and indirectly, inferred from multiple indicators.

Theoretical implications

This study contributes to the entrepreneurial literature in many ways by investigating the relationships between behavioral beliefs, attitudes, and intentions within the TPB. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first efforts to untangle the dimensions of the constructs under study and investigate the relationships between these dimensions using both direct and indirect measures of attitudes in males and females in Pakistani respondents. The findings of this study fully support this inclusively literature-driven approach to the critical function of TPB domains (i.e., ATB, PBC, and SN) to mediate the PT and EE paths on entrepreneurial intention variables. These findings are essential for entrepreneurs and educators. Their belief in becoming entrepreneurs may be strengthened by specific and practical training and instruction.

This study emphasizes the dynamic role of the support of family and friends in determining the entrepreneurial ability of prospective agricultural entrepreneurs, showing that concentrating solely on unique features is not sufficient to better understand entrepreneurship. Given this, an entrepreneurial social culture, particularly in Pakistan, must be developed. Incubators must be built by the government, tax reliefs introduced, and laws drafted to enable local risk capital companies and investors to start a new business. The government must take the initiative in this regard.

Moreover, given the importance and lack of practical skills among farmers, it is recommended that teaching practices and training courses be reviewed. Interaction and cooperation among universities, management departments, and organizations involved in this field be strengthened while adding practical approaches and identifying appropriate goals. Pakistan must create a stable and productive institutional entrepreneurship environment. Therefore, revising current regulations and infrastructure is suggested to clarify how young entrepreneurs rapidly engage in self-employment enterprises.

Practical implications

The study’s findings offer a foundation for policies to enhance entrepreneurial activity in academic performance and enable students to set up enterprises in an atmosphere conducive to the future. Endorsing business enterprises should be encouraged to utilize favorable government policies. A business development plan must be launched, including establishing a business plan for Pakistan, developing companies, and creating a large and conducive business ecosystem for emerging entrepreneurs in Pakistan. These initiatives should trickle down to the university level and motivate students to consider entrepreneurship as a viable economic tool. This study can help university decision-makers design a holistic strategy for developing students’ interest in agriculture. Business managerial institutes can provide awareness, build capacity, and set up steering committees to assist students with practical business ideas. As a result, measures need to be taken to increase agricultural enterprises’ internal and external motivations by encouraging development in agriculture, as well as making agriculture more competitive, profitable, and sustainable to ensure greater participation of young people, especially starting from their futuristic intentions.

Along with the significant gender difference in perceived attitudinal beliefs favoring men and the significant direct effect of subjective norms on nascent entrepreneurship found in our study, the aforementioned mediating effect of the TPB on gender suggests that educators and policymakers should create and support an environment that fosters entrepreneurial intention-action translation.

In a developing nation, this study highlights the need to translate work values into the entrepreneurship domain and improve attitudes toward entrepreneurship to foster emerging entrepreneurs. To this end, promoting sustainable business practices via the provision of business opportunities to prospective entrepreneurs may act as a double-edged sword, seeding sustainability-driven work values and facilitating the adoption of entrepreneurial intents and start-up execution. Thus, enterprise possibilities will bolster entrepreneurial aspirations and encourage sustainable entrepreneurship in the nation. As a result, the research recommends promoting entrepreneurial-driven work values and suggests that a greater emphasis on work values is placed on speeding people’s attitudes toward entrepreneurship.

Limitations

This study has some limitations. The first pertains to the cross-sectional design, which limits the study’s contribution to the literature on entrepreneurial aspirations. Further interpreted into actions, such as the longitudinal approach required. The sample consisted of agricultural students to explore specific examples only. As a result, the results should be interpreted cautiously and verified and reproduced in a more significant study with a diverse sample of students from other fields and institutions of higher learning. Second, the study participants expressed concern about utilizing their ideas as skill indicators because they are prone to bias and inaccuracy, creating business is much difficult [83] and did not dive into actual entrepreneurial activity [3]. However, this may not be relevant when a subjective evaluation of abilities is required. In contrast, personal ability evaluation may be a step toward potential creative variations in entrepreneurial aspirations, enhancing the study while enhancing result validity [6].

Future outlook research

Future research could provide a more in-depth assessment of entrepreneurial behavior. This would help shed light on family members’ and others’ roles in an individual’s closed network. This is especially essential in Pakistan, where familial connections and emotional bonds between family members are strong. The factors that prevent entrepreneurial purpose from translating into entrepreneurial action requires further study for insights into the desired professional decision in other regions of Pakistan. All the studied factors should be considered in future studies. Based on the study results, it can be concluded that personality and educational value are crucial. The results can help us better understand the entrepreneurial intention configuration process. Therefore, leveraging the sector’s enormous potential to transform the economy, this study is a unique step forward in entrepreneurial intent. Future studies may be necessary to examine how students’ self-efficacy develops as they complete university courses. Environmental variables that may enhance creativity and entrepreneurial self-efficacy across genders and disciplines can offer helpful information, especially for researchers working in higher education environments. Future research can gain insight into the factors contributing to positive or negative attitudes about a behavior, perceived social pressure to engage in an activity in recognizing that a ’one-size-fits-all’ approach to curricula may not be appropriate and that gender sensitive programming, particularly in relation to various levels of entrepreneurial settings, in conjunction with the development of women’s entrepreneurial aspirations.

(TXT)

Click here for additional data file.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

13 Sep 2021

PONE-D-21-23172How do Gender disparities in entrepreneurial aspirations emerge in Pakistan? An Approach to Mediational and Multigroup AnalysisPLOS ONE

Dear Authors,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: Please see comments below

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 28 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Dejan Dragan, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://aje.com/go/plos) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file

3. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“No fund provision to this study”

At this time, please address the following queries:

a)        Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution.

b)        State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

c)        If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

d)        If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

6. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

7. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

The reviewers have completed their review. They have adopted quite diverse decisions, from rejecting the paper all over to demand for minor revision. Accordingly, my desicion is: Major revision. AE DD

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Partly

Reviewer #4: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I have completed my review of the Manuscript Number: PONE-D-21-23172.

Title: How do Gender disparities in entrepreneurial aspirations emerge in Pakistan? An Approach to Mediational and Multigroup Analysis

Overall: Although the concept sounds interesting, the research is done very well, and the paper is thoroughly examined accordingly to readers perceptive.

The title seems to be very innovative exciting. Still, I must have some questions regarding your Manuscript the Author(-s) present an empirical study exploring the direct influence of Personality Traits and Entrepreneurial Education on Entrepreneurial Intention, estimated the mediating role of attitudes toward behavior, subjective norm and perceived control behavior on Entrepreneurial Intention why did you choose indirect effects?

Form and Style and Grammar:

Across the literature review and other areas, the use of past tense is the norm or refers to research already accomplished?

Introduction: it is well articulated and evidently well-defined the structure and research questions

An abstract is well written and complete description of the study and the participants.

The literature review was oudated to read. It reads as a regurgitation of facts from many other articles. You are reviewing the literature, but it is in your thoughts and research supporting the literature. Although it flow and transition in many areas and effectively create a case for your study however, re-correct and revise.

Methods:

Author(-s) should clarify their procedure iso making the reader speculate on what has been done. How instruments and the support are good, but there is little detail on how you used them and why they were used. Data collection processed not much evident, how many samples you choose and what sampling strategy you applied can you explain with evidence? Why did you choose Smart PLS rather than AMOS?

Results:

However, although the results and tabulations are well managed and understandable to readers' apprehensions and viewpoints, it must be redesigned according to the format of the journal?

Discussion: whereas the discussion section can be extending more with UpToDate reviews and researches? Add some limitations implications and future prospects of the study. Hence, it is not possible to evaluate the contribution to knowledge development.

References:

In-text citations are not appropriately formatted and are used without first listing all the authors. Reference pages are not correctly formatted according to journals format?

Reviewer #2: • When I was given the opportunity to review the manuscript entitled: How do Gender Disparities in Entrepreneurial Aspirations Emerge in Pakistan: An Approach to Mediational and Multigroup Analysis.

• In addition to being very original and intriguing, the title is extremely catchy. As a consequence, I have a few concerns regarding the text as a result of this. Based on their findings, the authors provide empirical research in which they investigate the direct impact of personality characteristics on entrepreneurial intention and the indirect influence of subjective norm and perceive control behavior on entrepreneurial intention.

• The introduction is straightforward and concise in terms of form, style, and language, and the framework and study subjects are well identified. When writing an abstract, make sure it's well-written and includes a thorough explanation of the research and participants.

• Is the past tense usage ubiquitous in the literature review and other areas, or does it relate to previously completed research? The literature evaluation was made available for reading. It reads like a rehash of many other publications' information. While you are reading the material, your insights and research are substantiating the literature. Although it flows and transitions well in many sections and successfully builds a case for your research, it should be revised and re-corrected.

• Methods: Why did you select Smart PLS over AMOS as your method of choice? Instead of leaving the reader shady regarding how something was accomplished, the author(s) should describe their strategies and approach. Although the instruments and support are of high quality, little information is available on how and why they were used. Data collection methods are not completely clear; how many samples you selected and the selection methodology you employed are not entirely visible; are you able to provide evidence to support your decisions?

• However, even though the findings and tabulations are well-organized and easily understood in light of readers' concerns and perspectives, they must be modified to conform to the journal's format?

• Whereas the discussion area might be expanded with more up-to-date evaluations and researches? Include some of the study's shortcomings, consequences, and future opportunities. As a result, the contribution to knowledge growth cannot be quantified.

• Citations in the text: In-text citations are not properly structured, and they are utilized without first providing the names of all authors. Are reference pages not structured properly following the journal's format?

• Overall, I was ecstatic that while the idea is intriguing, the study is done very effectively. The article is quite extensively analyzed, following the readers' perceptions of the subject matter.

• Finally, keep in mind that I highly endorsed this manuscript; nevertheless, the authors can explain themselves above any issues; thus, I must assign this paper with minor revisions to get acceptance from the editor of the reputed journal.

Reviewer #3: acThe study aims to find out the “How do Gender disparities in entrepreneurial aspirations emerge in Pakistan? An Approach to Mediational and Multigroup Analysis”. The topic is interested in the field. However, some considerations need to be explained for improving the quality of the manuscript and after minor explanations and corrections, the paper could be published.

Reviewer #4: Though I am a non-native, still it was difficult for me to understand the communication in many places in this manuscript.

Abstract

1. Abstract is too long. It should be precise with the core information from the paper.

Introduction

I missed a solid problem motivation in introduction. Statements seemed to be not well integrated. Thus, it becomes difficult to grasp the knowledge-gap/problem which is addressed by this study.

1. Sounds strange: personality characteristics, innovating innovative approaches….

2. What is the elaboration of TPB (Page 4, line 100)?

Literature review

1. This section hardly reflected the theoretical background on the subject matter.

2. It appears that some components of the methodology are incorporated in this section.

Materials and method

1. I am confused about the sample size under the sub-section ‘Data collection procedure and participants.’

2. It is not mentioned how the samples were collected.

3. What are the core variables used in this study? How were those measured?

Results and Discussion

1. Results from a number of reliability and validity tests are incorporated (Table 2). I wonder if data were checked for suitability of running SEM.

2. I could hardly find the gender aspect in the bunch of analyses undertaken in this section.

3. It appears the findings are not well-articulated with discussion

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Submitted filename: Recommendation.docx

Click here for additional data file.

8 Oct 2021

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you very much for your consideration of our PONE-S-21-16449 manuscript.

We have fully addressed each point and carefully described our response after each comment and questions elevated by respected reviewers:

We are going to respond to the editorial desk, and we anticipate that the modifications are adequate. If there are somewhat changes, please indicate new modifications that would revise and improve the manuscript and make it suitable for its acceptance.

In the revised manuscript version, the new sentences and paragraphs are in the main revised manuscript, With Track Changes (marked-up copy) and Without Track, Changes (clean copy) files to easily be recognized by the editorial desk. Whereas the response to reviewers are made in Red (questions raised by reviewers) and in Blue (Response to reviewers) are also attached here with.

Responses to Reviewers

IReviewer #1:

I have completed my review of the Manuscript Number: PONE-D-21-23172.

Title: How do Gender disparities in entrepreneurial aspirations emerge in Pakistan? An Approach to Mediational and Multigroup Analysis

Overall: Although the concept sounds interesting, the research is done very well, and the paper is thoroughly examined accordingly to readers perceptive.

The title seems to be very innovative exciting. Still, I must have some questions regarding your Manuscript the Author(-s) present an empirical study exploring the direct influence of Personality Traits and Entrepreneurial Education on Entrepreneurial Intention, estimated the mediating role of attitudes toward behavior, subjective norm and perceived control behavior on Entrepreneurial Intention why did you choose indirect effects?

Dear reviewer, thank you very much for your remarks regarding this study Researchers prefer structural equation modeling (SEM) over traditional analyses, which overlook the connections between latent components that are implicitly assessed through numerous measurement items and pathways (Bollen, 2014; Chin, 1998a). Among the two primary SEM techniques in use today, covariance-based and partial least squares (PLS), the latter is more appropriate than other analytical methods for a variety of reasons. To begin, the PLS-SEM approach simplifies the modeling of formative and reflective structures by allowing for the handling of second-order constructs (Chin, 1995, 1998b) (Wetzels et al., 2009). Second, it analyzes both the measurement and structural models concurrently (Wixom & Watson, 2001). Third, the PLS-SEM technique is often suggested when the multivariate normality criterion is violated in a dataset (Kock, 2020c).

While PLS-SEM is often used, it frequently produces results that enable multivariate normality, multicollinearity, common-method bias, and prediction validity testing.

Form and Style and Grammar:

Across the literature review and other areas, the use of past tense is the norm or refers to research already accomplished?

Dear reviewer, thank you very much for your comment. We added new citations the following statements and up to date relevant literature and appropriate range of cited sources in the literature review section have been incorporated in the main text.

Introduction: it is well articulated and evidently well-defined the structure and research questions

Dear reviewer, thank you very much for your comment regarding introduction section has been revised, the introductory part has also been re-structure and updated. It may explain the problem and issue of this analysis to provide the research primary and objectives; fresh modifications are produced to the text.

An abstract is well written and complete description of the study and the participants.

Thank you very much for your comments in the sense of abstract of the paper has been summarized, and succinct results have been updated and included into the final version of the manuscript as well.

The literature review was oudated to read. It reads as a regurgitation of facts from many other articles. You are reviewing the literature, but it is in your thoughts and research supporting the literature. Although it flows and transition in many areas and effectively create a case for your study however, re-correct and revise.

We appreciate your time in leaving a remark. The literature review statements and section have been updated with new citations, and the most current relevant material, as well as a sufficient range of cited sources from the literature review section, have been included into the main text.

Methods:

Author(-s) should clarify their procedure iso making the reader speculate on what has been done. How instruments and the support are good, but there is little detail on how you used them and why they were used. Data collection processed not much evident, how many samples you choose and what sampling strategy you applied can you explain with evidence? Why did you choose Smart PLS rather than AMOS?

We surveyed 400 graduate students from four of Pakistan's major institutions. Our choice of a population-restricted agribusiness students is justified by Pakistan's pronounced gender disparities in entrepreneurship. Our selection of simple random sampling strategy based on population restricted agribusiness students is supported by the Pakistani contexts distinctive gender inequalities in entrepreneurship. A total of 400 questions were posed, and 350 investigations were conducted, yielding a total of 309 relevant questions and a response rate of 77.25 percent, with 184 males (60%) and 125 females participating (40 percent)

PLS-SEM is a technique for exploratory data analysis that utilizes primary or secondary data (Not suitable for CB-SEM-Hair 2015). The PLS method is appropriate for researchers with a prediction-oriented goal since it does not need normal data distribution and allows for small sample sizes (Chin & Newsted, 1999). Wherever CB-SEM is used, a larger sample size (minimum >400) is required. One of the primary benefits of PLS-SEM over CB-SEM is its ability to handle many independent variables concurrently, even when they exhibit multicollinearity (Hair, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2011). Additionally, PLS-SEM gives R2 values and shows the importance of connections between constructs to illustrate the model's performance. On the other hand, CB-SEM is limited to path modeling (coefficient and CR). Bear in mind that PLS is more appropriate for prediction-based research, while CB-SEM is not appropriate for model fit therefore we choose SMART PLS-SEM approach to analysis our data.

Results:

However, although the results and tabulations are well managed and understandable to readers' apprehensions and viewpoints, it must be redesigned according to the format of the journal?

All of the tables and figures have been included in the main manuscript and their numerical and numbering have been updated. Table 1 to Table 9 and Figure 1 on page 9 to Figure 3 on page 18 have been included in the main text as well as their numerical and numbering have been changed.

Discussion: whereas the discussion section can be extending more with UpToDate reviews and researches? Add some limitations implications and future prospects of the study. Hence, it is not possible

All of the results in the discussion section and contributions from the research have been included in the discussion section, which allows us to compare our findings with those of other recent studies. Our findings provide answers to the study's pertinent issues and achieve the study's primary goals. e to evaluate the contribution to knowledge development. Also, limitations theoretical and empirical implications and future prospects of the study have been added in the conclusion section

References:

In-text citations are not appropriately formatted and are used without first listing all the authors. Reference pages are not correctly formatted according to journals format?

Throughout references are used to refer to all correctly formatted references without first identifying all of the authors. Citation pages are revised and restructured to conform to the journal's style.

Reviewer #2:

When I was given the opportunity to review the manuscript entitled: How do Gender Disparities in Entrepreneurial Aspirations Emerge in Pakistan: An Approach to Mediational and Multigroup Analysis.

• In addition to being very original and intriguing, the title is extremely catchy. As a consequence, I have a few concerns regarding the text as a result of this. Based on their findings, the authors provide empirical research in which they investigate the direct impact of personality characteristics on entrepreneurial intention and the indirect influence of subjective norm and perceive control behavior on entrepreneurial intention.

• The introduction is straightforward and concise in terms of form, style, and language, and the framework and study subjects are well identified. When writing an abstract, make sure it's well-written and includes a thorough explanation of the research and participants.

Dear Reviewer. Thank you for your feedback on the introduction section, which has been changed. The introductory portion has also been re-structured and updated as a result of your feedback. As a result of this analysis, it is possible to describe the problem and issue in order to give the research primary and goals; new changes are made to the text. We have addressed each issue and provided a thorough explanation of our answer following each remark. The new phrases are highlighted in yellow in the updated version of the document, making it easy for the reviewers to see where they have been added.

• Is the past tense usage ubiquitous in the literature review and other areas, or does it relate to previously completed research? The literature evaluation was made available for reading. It reads like a rehash of many other publications' information. While you are reading the material, your insights and research are substantiating the literature. Although it flows and transitions well in many sections and successfully builds a case for your research, it should be revised and re-corrected.

In the literature review section, the most current relevant material has been included, as has an adequate range of referenced references from a variety of sources. When it comes to transitioning into self-employment, the literature review section looks at the variables that affect it, with special emphasis given to the variations between males and females.

• Methods: Why did you select Smart PLS over AMOS as your method of choice? Instead of leaving the reader shady regarding how something was accomplished, the author(s) should describe their strategies and approach. Although the instruments and support are of high quality, little information is available on how and why they were used. Data collection methods are not completely clear; how many samples you selected and the selection methodology you employed are not entirely visible; are you able to provide evidence to support your decisions?

PLS-SEM is an exploratory data analysis method that makes use of either primary or secondary data sources (Not suitable for CB-SEM-Hair 2015). Because it does not need normal data distribution and allows for small sample sizes, the PLS technique is well suited for researchers with a prediction-oriented objective (Chin & Newsted, 1999). CB-SEM is only applicable in situations in which a higher sample size (minimum >400) is needed. One of the most significant advantages of PLS-SEM over CB-SEM is its capacity to handle a large number of independent variables at the same time, even when they show multicollinearity (Hair, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2011). To further highlight the model's effectiveness, PLS-SEM provides R2 values and demonstrates the significance of linkages between constructs, among other things. CB-SEM, on the other hand, is restricted to path modeling alone (coefficient and CR). Because PLS is more suitable for prediction-based research, but CB-SEM is not appropriate for model fit, we have chosen a SMART PLS-SEM method for our data analysis.

Our poll included almost 400 graduate students from four major Pakistani universities. The fact that there are significant gender inequalities in entrepreneurship in Pakistan lends credence to our selection of agribusiness students from a limited sample of the country's population. The particular gender disparities in entrepreneurship that exist in the Pakistani context justify the use of a basic random sample method in this research, which is based on agribusiness students from a restricted population. 400 questions were asked, and 350 investigations were carried out, yielding a total of 309 pertinent questions and a response rate of 77.25 percent, with 184 males (60 percent) and 125 women participating in the research (40 percent).

• However, even though the findings and tabulations are well-organized and easily understood in light of readers' concerns and perspectives, they must be modified to conform to the journal's format?

All tables and figures have been included into the main text, and their numerical and numbering conventions have been changed. Tables 1 to 9 and Figures 1 to 3 on pages 9 to 18 have been included into the main text, and their numerical and numbering conventions have been modified accordingly.

• Whereas the discussion area might be expanded with more up-to-date evaluations and researches? Include some of the study's shortcomings, consequences, and future opportunities. As a result, the contribution to knowledge growth cannot be quantified.

The comparison of our findings to those of other current studies due to the fact that all of the results and all of the study's contributions were included in the discussion section. It is our results that have provided answers to relevant research issues and have enabled us to accomplish the main objectives of the study, which were to evaluate the study's contribution to knowledge creation and dissemination. Also included are discussions of the study's shortcomings, theoretical and empirical consequences, and future possibilities in the conclusion part of the paper.

• Citations in the text: In-text citations are not properly structured, and they are utilized without first providing the names of all authors. Are reference pages not structured properly following the journal's format?

Throughout the manuscript, the bibliography and document citation have been restructured and are utilized without first mentioning that all authors current and up to date citations are added. The reference pages have been re-formatted to be more readable. It has been utilized throughout the remainder of the citations and in the final list of references. The paper has been thoroughly examined, and we have found no additional mistakes of this kind in it.

• Overall, I was ecstatic that while the idea is intriguing, the study is done very effectively. The article is quite extensively analyzed, following the readers' perceptions of the subject matter.

• Finally, keep in mind that I highly endorsed this manuscript; nevertheless, the authors can explain themselves above any issues; thus, I must assign this paper with minor revisions to get acceptance from the editor of the reputed journal.

With all due respect and attention for your remark, we have examined the section and feel that we have identified the major limits of our study, to which we have included recommendations for future research. We thank you for your time and consideration. We have addressed each issue and provided a thorough explanation of our answer following each remark. The new phrases are highlighted in yellow in the updated version of the document, making it easy for the reviewers to see where they have been added.

Reviewer #3:

The study aims to find out the “How do Gender disparities in entrepreneurial aspirations emerge in Pakistan? An Approach to Mediational and Multigroup Analysis”. The topic is interested in the field. However, some considerations need to be explained for improving the quality of the manuscript and after minor explanations and corrections, the paper could be published.

Dear reviewer, thank you very much for your suggestion. We added that sections and have re-organization and revised of the abstract, introduction, literature review study framework, hypothesis development, material and methods, results and analysis discussion and contribution and conclusion sections have also been completed.

Reviewer #4:

Though I am a non-native, still it was difficult for me to understand the communication in many places in this manuscript.

Abstract

1. Abstract is too long. It should be precise with the core information from the paper.

The abstract of the paper has been summarized, and succinct results have been updated and integrated into the text as well as the body of the manuscript.

Introduction

I missed a solid problem motivation in introduction. Statements seemed to be not well integrated. Thus, it becomes difficult to grasp the knowledge-gap/problem which is addressed by this study.

A re-organization and revision of the introductory section has also been completed. In order to provide the study's goals and objectives, it may explain the problem and issue of this analysis; new modifications are produced to the text as a result to grasp the knowledge-gap problem which is addressed by this study.

1. Sounds strange: personality characteristics, innovating innovative approaches….

2. What is the elaboration of TPB (Page 4, line 100)?

Personality characteristics are almost as effective as the more numerous lower-level, specialized qualities in predicting and explaining real behavior. Understanding a key employee is just as critical as understanding its operations and procedures. Understanding the personality components that influence subordinates' behavior is critical information for management because it can be used to determine the type of assignments that should be given, the manner in which motivation should be pursued, the team dynamics that may arise, and the best way to approach conflict and/or praise when applicable. However whole paragraph has revised accordingly.

Where as the TPB stands for the Theory of Planned Behavior was first created by Ajzen in 1991 to represent the connection between an individual’s attitude toward a specific action and the actual behavior.

Literature review

1. This section hardly reflected the theoretical background on the subject matter.

2. It appears that some components of the methodology are incorporated in this section.

The most recent relevant literature has been incorporated, as well as an appropriate range of cited sources in the literature review section. The literature review section examines the factors that influence transitions into self-employment, with particular attention paid to differences between men and women.

Materials and method

1. I am confused about the sample size under the sub-section ‘Data collection procedure and participants.’

2. It is not mentioned how the samples were collected.

3. What are the core variables used in this study? How were those measured?

We polled 400 graduate students from four major Pakistani universities. The fact that Pakistan has significant gender inequalities in entrepreneurship justifies our selection of a population-restricted agribusiness students. The Pakistani context's unique gender disparities in entrepreneurship justify our use of a simple random sample method based on population restricted agribusiness students. A total of 400 questions were asked, and 350 investigations were carried out, giving a total of 309 pertinent questions and a response rate of 77.25 percent, with 184 men (60 percent) and 125 females participating (40 percent).

This study's questionnaire was based on a 5-point Likert scale and modified from previous research on theory of planned behavior (TPBs). It goes from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) (strongly agree). The constructs Entrepreneurial Intention (EI) and Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) were evaluated using five items from (Liñán & Chen, 2009);, while attitudes toward behavior (ATB) were examined using five questions from (Kolvereid & Isaksen, 2006). [22]. Finally, five items from (Hao Zhao et al., 2010) were used to assess Entrepreneurial Education (EE) and five questions to assess Personality Traits (PT).

Whereas the control variables Entrepreneurial Intention (EIs) has been linked to various control factors (Liñán & Chen, 2009);. To determine gender, the author used dummy-coded variables for Entrepreneurial Intention (EI), Prior Entrepreneurial Knowledge (PEK), Parental Entrepreneurial Exposure (PEX), Prior Entrepreneurial Exposure (PEE), and Prior Farming Exposure (0 = female; 1 = male) and (1=Yes;0=No) for Entrepreneurial Intention (EI), Prior Entrepreneurial Knowledge (PEK), Parental Entrepreneurial Exposure (PEX), Prior Entrepreneurial Exposure (PFE). Whereas the gender disparities in entrepreneurial activity have been confirmed by the study of (Arshad et al., 2016).

Results and Discussion

1. Results from a number of reliability and validity tests are incorporated (Table 2). I wonder if data were checked for suitability of running SEM.

2. I could hardly find the gender aspect in the bunch of analyses undertaken in this section.

3. It appears the findings are not well-articulated with discussion

In order to accomplish this research objective, the author used Smart PLS 3. (Henseler et al., 2016) The structural equation model (SEM) is a precise technique that may be used to assess social, behavioral, and agricultural sciences in order to experimentally verify the relationship between model variables. There are many ongoing and preliminary stages involved in the adoption of this model. These phases include a description of the theoretical model to be tested, parameter estimation, and evaluation. It was decided to assess the reflective measurement model based on two sets of criteria. In order to support the validity of the questionnaire, measuring methods that have previously been tested and validated should be employed (Wang et al., 2015). Additionally, the author conducted preliminary survey testing on 30 respondents to ensure that the questions in this research were both understandable and trustworthy prior to distributing the survey. It has shown that certain problems have been moved and changed in order to simplify the study.

Our findings compared to those of other recent research is feasible since we included all of the results and all of the study's contributions in the discussion section. Our findings provide answers to pertinent research questions and allow us to achieve the study's primary goals, namely evaluating the study's contribution to knowledge production and dissemination. Additionally, the conclusion section discusses the study's limitations, theoretical and empirical implications, and future prospects.

We hope that the changes that have been made are satisfactory. If not, please specify any further changes that would be necessary to enhance the text and make it acceptable for submission.

Thanking in anticipation

10 Nov 2021

How do gender disparities in entrepreneurial aspirations emerge in Pakistan? an approach to mediation and multi-group analysis

PONE-D-21-23172R1

Dear Authors,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Dejan Dragan, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The authors have very carefully and adequately corrected their manuscript due to the instructions of reviewers. Accordingly, the AE's recommendation is: An acceptance of the paper.

Reviewers' comments:

19 Nov 2021

PONE-D-21-23172R1

How do gender disparities in entrepreneurial aspirations emerge in Pakistan? an approach to mediation and multi-group analysis

Dear Dr. Sargani:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Dejan Dragan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE