V G Krut1, I V Astrakhantseva1, S A Chuvpilo1, G A Efimov2, S G Ambaryan1, M S Drutskaya1,3, S A Nedospasov4,5. 1. Sirius University of Science and Technology, Federal Territory Sirius/Sochi, Russia. 2. National Medical Research Center of Hematology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. 3. Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. 4. Sirius University of Science and Technology, Federal Territory Sirius/Sochi, Russia. sergei.nedospasov@gmail.com. 5. Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. sergei.nedospasov@gmail.com.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 is a new coronavirus that is the cause of COVID-19 pandemic. To enter the cell, the virus interacts via its surface S protein with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the main entry receptor on the cell membrane. Most of protective antibodies, including those induced by vaccinations, target the S protein, preventing its interaction with the ACE2 receptor. We have evaluated an alternative strategy for blocking the S-ACE2 interaction using new antipeptide antibodies to the N-terminus of the ACE2 molecule. These antibodies allow detection of human ACE2 in vitro and ex vivo.
SARS-CoV-2 is a new coronavirus that is the cause of COVID-19 pandemic. To enter the cell, the virus interacts via its surface S protein with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the main entry receptor on the cell membrane. Most of protective antibodies, including those induced by vaccinations, target the S protein, preventing its interaction with the ACE2 receptor. We have evaluated an alternative strategy for blocking the S-ACE2 interaction using new antipeptide antibodies to the N-terminus of the ACE2 molecule. These antibodies allow detection of human ACE2 in vitro and ex vivo.
The SARS-CoV-2 virus, a massive infection with which caused a devastating pandemic, the COVID-19 disease, also in Russia [1], uses angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE2), a membrane-bound protease, as its main receptor on human cells. The peplomers of the virion, formed by the S protein multimers, come into contact with ACE2 through their receptor-binding domain (RBD). It is believed that neutralizing antibodies in recovered and vaccinated persons bind precisely to these domains on the peplomeres of the virus and prevent its interaction with the ACE2 receptor and the entry of the virus into the cell. In this study, we investigated an alternative way to disrupt the interaction of the virus and the receptor using antibodies to the N-terminal domain of ACE2 of a person involved in contact with RBD.On the basis on the data of X-ray structural analysis of the RBD–ACE2 complex [2, 3], we selected a 32-amino acids (aa) (P1), which consists of the aa residues 9-50 of the ACE2 sequence and has a well-expressed alpha-helical conformation. In ACE2, this peptide forms several contacts with the spike proteins of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. This peptide was chemically synthesized by the standard solid-phase method and purified by high-performance liquid chromatography, and its sequence was confirmed by mass spectrometry (data not shown). Simultaneously, a variant of the same peptide was prepared, which contained the fluorescent label (5,6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM)) at the N-terminus. Then, two rabbits were immunized with the unlabeled 32-aa peptide without conjugation to a carrier protein in complete Freund’s adjuvant; the animals received two injections of the peptide with an interval of 21 days. Although the generated antibodies are polyclonal, we assume that they recognize a very small number of closely located linear epitopes on the human ACE2 molecule, which makes their properties, in fact, similar to monospecific antibodies.Forty days after the start of immunization, antibodies from rabbit blood serum (hereinafter referred to as aP1Ab) were purified by chromatography using protein A-conjugated agarose and tested in ELISA with the peptide antigen used for immunization (Fig. 1a). In addition, they were subjected to Western blotting analysis with a small recombinant P2 protein corresponding to the N-terminus of ACE2 (amino acid residues 19–101) (Fig. 1b). The 6His-labeled P2 protein was cloned into the pET-22(+) vector, expressed in E. coli strain BL21, and purified according to the standard method using metal affinity chromatography (Fig. 1c).
Fig. 1.
Interaction of aP1Ab antibodies with proteins fragments of the N-terminal region of ACE2. (a) Interaction of purified antibodies with P1 peptide-coated microplate (1µg/mL) in comparison with preimmune rabbit serum. The reaction was measured after the addition of anti-rabbit antibodies labeled with HRP and TMB (tetramethylbenzidine) substrate (absorbance at 450–620 nm). The experiment was carried out in triplicate, the figure shows the median ± SEM. (b) Interaction of aP1Ab (1µg/mL) with purified P2 protein fractions analyzed by Western Blotting. 1—bacterial lysate, 2—flowthrough fraction, 3–5—fractions after washing the column, 6–8—eluate.
Interaction of aP1Ab antibodies with proteins fragments of the N-terminal region of ACE2. (a) Interaction of purified antibodies with P1 peptide-coated microplate (1µg/mL) in comparison with preimmune rabbit serum. The reaction was measured after the addition of anti-rabbit antibodies labeled with HRP and TMB (tetramethylbenzidine) substrate (absorbance at 450–620 nm). The experiment was carried out in triplicate, the figure shows the median ± SEM. (b) Interaction of aP1Ab (1µg/mL) with purified P2 protein fractions analyzed by Western Blotting. 1—bacterial lysate, 2—flowthrough fraction, 3–5—fractions after washing the column, 6–8—eluate.At this stage, we assessed the aP1Ab antibodies by their ability to detect human ACE2 in HEK293T cells inducibly producing ACE2 in the Cre-dependent system (Fig. 2a), as well as in the tissues of transgenic mice expressing human ACE2 under the control of the K18 epithelial promoter (Fig. 2b) [4-7].
Fig. 2.
Evaluation of hACE2 expression in transfected HEK293T cells and in tissues of transgenic mice by Western blotting analysis. (a) 1—HEK293T (without transfection), 2—HEK293T transfected with p-Cre-hACE2-Kat (2.5 μg), 3—HEK293T transfected with p-Cre-hACE2-Kat (2.5 μg) + plasmid encoding Cre-recombinase (0.75 μg). (c) Protein extract isolated from intestinal tissue homogenate: 1—K18-hACE2 transgenic mouse, 2—wild-type C57Bl/6 mouse.
Evaluation of hACE2 expression in transfected HEK293T cells and in tissues of transgenic mice by Western blotting analysis. (a) 1—HEK293T (without transfection), 2—HEK293T transfected with p-Cre-hACE2-Kat (2.5 μg), 3—HEK293T transfected with p-Cre-hACE2-Kat (2.5 μg) + plasmid encoding Cre-recombinase (0.75 μg). (c) Protein extract isolated from intestinal tissue homogenate: 1—K18-hACE2 transgenic mouse, 2—wild-type C57Bl/6 mouse.It should be noted that the epitopes for aP1Ab antibodies are located far away from the position of the active center of ACE2 [8] and should not interfere with the enzymatic activity of this protease, which regulates many aspects of the cardiovascular system physiology.After verification of the purity and specificity of aP1Ab antibodies, we tested our hypothesis about the possibility of alternative blockade of the interaction between the SARS-CoV-2 S protein and ACE2. The recombinant full-length 6His-labeled S protein was expressed in the Expi293F eukaryotic system (Termo) and purified by metal affinity chromatography. S protein adsorbed on the support specifically bound both the 5,6-FAM-labeled P1 peptide (Fig. 3a) and the P2 protein (Fig. 3b).
Fig. 3.
Interaction of ACE2 fragments with the S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. (a) Fluorescence intensity (FI: excitation—483nm, emission—530nm) was measured after incubation of peptide 5,6-FAM-P1 for 1 h at room temperature on a microplate coated with S protein (1µg/mL). (b) Absorbance (A 450–620) was measured after P2 protein at various incubation concentrations on the microplate coated with S protein. aP1Ab were used as primary antibodies (1µg/mL). The reaction was measured after the addition of anti-rabbit antibodies labeled with HRP followed by TMB substrate. All experiments were performed in triplicate, the figure shows the median ± SEM.
Interaction of ACE2 fragments with the S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. (a) Fluorescence intensity (FI: excitation—483nm, emission—530nm) was measured after incubation of peptide 5,6-FAM-P1 for 1 h at room temperature on a microplate coated with S protein (1µg/mL). (b) Absorbance (A 450–620) was measured after P2 protein at various incubation concentrations on the microplate coated with S protein. aP1Ab were used as primary antibodies (1µg/mL). The reaction was measured after the addition of anti-rabbit antibodies labeled with HRP followed by TMB substrate. All experiments were performed in triplicate, the figure shows the median ± SEM.The addition of aP1Ab antibodies to the system led to a dose-dependent blockade of the interaction between the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 and the P2 protein (Fig. 4) corresponding to the ACE2 N-terminus, which is consistent with our hypothesis.
Fig. 4.
Dose-dependent blockade of the interaction of ACE2 fragment with S protein of SARS-CoV-2 virus. P2 protein (200 ng/mL) was preincubated with aP1Ab at various concentrations at room temperature for 30 min. Then, the P2-aP1Ab complex was added to a microplate coated with S protein (1µg/mL). Absorbance (A 450–620) was measured after incubation with anti-His-HRP antibodies and the addition of TMB substrate. All experiments were performed in triplicate, the figure shows the median ± SEM.
Dose-dependent blockade of the interaction of ACE2 fragment with S protein of SARS-CoV-2 virus. P2 protein (200 ng/mL) was preincubated with aP1Ab at various concentrations at room temperature for 30 min. Then, the P2-aP1Ab complex was added to a microplate coated with S protein (1µg/mL). Absorbance (A 450–620) was measured after incubation with anti-His-HRP antibodies and the addition of TMB substrate. All experiments were performed in triplicate, the figure shows the median ± SEM.What is the possible clinical significance of our findings? First, in the majority of the existing (tested and approved) prophylactic vaccines, the original Wuhan variant of the S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus represent the immunogen. Immune (antibody) response to the RBD of the S protein of the virus, induced by vaccination, may be ineffective against new variants of the virus [9], which are still able to effectively bind to ACE2. Indeed, the structure of ACE2, which is a receptor for all variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, remains unchanged; therefore, the antibodies to the moiety of the ACE2 molecule that interacts with the RBD of the S protein of the virion can block any variants of the virus (Fig. 5). It should be noted that a virus that lost its ability to bind to human ACE2 as a result of mutations also loses the ability to enter the cell using this receptor.
Fig. 5.
Two types of antibodies that may interfere with interaction of S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and ACE2 receptor. Both antibodies against the RBD of the viral S protein (light) and antibodies against the RBD-interacting N-terminal domain of ACE2 (dark) can prevent the entry of the virus into the cell using this receptor.
Two types of antibodies that may interfere with interaction of S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and ACE2 receptor. Both antibodies against the RBD of the viral S protein (light) and antibodies against the RBD-interacting N-terminal domain of ACE2 (dark) can prevent the entry of the virus into the cell using this receptor.Second, autoantibodies to ACE2 in humans have been described in the literature [10]; however, the location of the recognized epitopes on the ACE2 molecule has not been determined. On the basis of our results, it can be assumed that some individuals with autoantibodies to their own ACE2 may have an increased resistance to infection with a wide range of SARS-CoV-2 variants (Fig. 5). This interesting hypothesis can be experimentally tested in the future.
Authors: Anthony J Turner; Sarah R Tipnis; Jodie L Guy; Gillian Rice; Nigel M Hooper Journal: Can J Physiol Pharmacol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: Rita E Chen; Xianwen Zhang; James Brett Case; Emma S Winkler; Yang Liu; Laura A VanBlargan; Jianying Liu; John M Errico; Xuping Xie; Naveenchandra Suryadevara; Pavlo Gilchuk; Seth J Zost; Stephen Tahan; Lindsay Droit; Jackson S Turner; Wooseob Kim; Aaron J Schmitz; Mahima Thapa; David Wang; Adrianus C M Boon; Rachel M Presti; Jane A O'Halloran; Alfred H J Kim; Parakkal Deepak; Dora Pinto; Daved H Fremont; James E Crowe; Davide Corti; Herbert W Virgin; Ali H Ellebedy; Pei-Yong Shi; Michael S Diamond Journal: Nat Med Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 87.241
Authors: Jian Zheng; Lok-Yin Roy Wong; Kun Li; Abhishek Kumar Verma; Miguel E Ortiz; Christine Wohlford-Lenane; Mariah R Leidinger; C Michael Knudson; David K Meyerholz; Paul B McCray; Stanley Perlman Journal: Nature Date: 2020-11-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Claude Kwe Yinda; Julia R Port; Trenton Bushmaker; Irene Offei Owusu; Jyothi N Purushotham; Victoria A Avanzato; Robert J Fischer; Jonathan E Schulz; Myndi G Holbrook; Madison J Hebner; Rebecca Rosenke; Tina Thomas; Andrea Marzi; Sonja M Best; Emmie de Wit; Carl Shaia; Neeltje van Doremalen; Vincent J Munster Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Fatai S Oladunni; Jun-Gyu Park; Paula A Pino; Olga Gonzalez; Anwari Akhter; Anna Allué-Guardia; Angélica Olmo-Fontánez; Shalini Gautam; Andreu Garcia-Vilanova; Chengjin Ye; Kevin Chiem; Colwyn Headley; Varun Dwivedi; Laura M Parodi; Kendra J Alfson; Hilary M Staples; Alyssa Schami; Juan I Garcia; Alison Whigham; Roy Neal Platt; Michal Gazi; Jesse Martinez; Colin Chuba; Stephanie Earley; Oscar H Rodriguez; Stephanie Davis Mdaki; Katrina N Kavelish; Renee Escalona; Cory R A Hallam; Corbett Christie; Jean L Patterson; Tim J C Anderson; Ricardo Carrion; Edward J Dick; Shannan Hall-Ursone; Larry S Schlesinger; Xavier Alvarez; Deepak Kaushal; Luis D Giavedoni; Joanne Turner; Luis Martinez-Sobrido; Jordi B Torrelles Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: T V Bobik; N N Kostin; G A Skryabin; P N Tsabai; M A Simonova; V D Knorre; O N Stratienko; N L Aleshenko; I I Vorobiev; E N Khurs; Yu A Mokrushina; I V Smirnov; A I Alekhin; A E Nikitin; A G Gabibov Journal: Acta Naturae Date: 2021 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 1.845
Authors: Viktoriya G Krut'; Sergei A Chuvpilo; Irina V Astrakhantseva; Liubov I Kozlovskaya; Grigory A Efimov; Andrei A Kruglov; Marina S Drutskaya; Sergei A Nedospasov Journal: Biochemistry (Mosc) Date: 2022-07 Impact factor: 2.824