| Literature DB >> 34873252 |
Parveen Sobia1, Thevani Pillay1, Lenine J P Liebenberg1,2, Aida Sivro1,2, Leila E Mansoor1, Farzana Osman1, Jo-Ann S Passmore1,3, Quarraisha Abdool Karim1,4, Salim S Abdool Karim1,4, Cheryl Baxter1, Lyle R McKinnon1,5,6, Derseree Archary7,8.
Abstract
Inflammatory cytokines augment humoral responses by stimulating antibody production and inducing class-switching. In women, genital inflammation (GI) significantly modifies HIV risk. However, the impact of GI on mucosal antibodies remains undefined. We investigated the impact of GI, pre-HIV infection, on antibody isotypes and IgG subclasses in the female genital tract. Immunoglobulin (Ig) isotypes, IgG subclasses and 48 cytokines were measured prior to HIV infection in cervicovaginal lavages (CVL) from 66 HIV seroconverters (cases) and 66 matched HIV-uninfected women (controls) enrolled in the CAPRISA 004 and 008 1% tenofovir gel trials. Pre-HIV infection, cases had significantly higher genital IgM (4.13; IQR, 4.04-4.19) compared to controls (4.06; IQR, 3.90-4.20; p = 0.042). More than one-quarter of cases (27%) had GI compared to just over one-tenth (12%) in controls. Significantly higher IgG1, IgG3, IgG4 and IgM (all p < 0.05) were found in women stratified for GI compared to women without. Adjusted linear mixed models showed several pro-inflammatory, chemotactic, growth factors, and adaptive cytokines significantly correlated with higher titers of IgM, IgA and IgG subclasses (p < 0.05). The strong and significant positive correlations between mucosal antibodies and markers of GI suggest that GI may impact mucosal antibody profiles. These findings require further investigation to establish a plausible biological link between the local inflammatory milieu and its consequence on these genital antibodies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34873252 PMCID: PMC8648917 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02954-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Baseline characteristics of case and controls included in this study.
| Demographics | Cases (N = 66) | Controls (N = 66) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age in years, median (IQR) | 23 (21–27) | 24 (21–28) | 0.310 |
| 0.446 | |||
| Less than primary, % (n) | 19.7 (13) | 7.6 (5) | |
| Primary Complete, % (n) | 34.8 (23) | 43.9 (29) | |
| High school complete, % (n) | 42.4 (28) | 47 (31) | |
| Tertiary complete, % (n) | 3.0 (2) | 1.5 (1) | |
| 0.704 | |||
| Married, % (n) | 4.5 (3) | 9.1 (6) | |
| Stable partner, % (n) | 84.8 (56) | 84.8 (56) | |
| Casual partner, % (n) | 6.1 (4) | 1.5 (1) | |
| Other, % (n) | 4.5 (3) | 4.5 (3) | |
| Age (years) of sexual debut, median (IQR) | 17 (16–18) | 18 (16–19) | 0.008 |
| Number of lifetime sexual partners, median (IQR) | 2 (1.5–4) | 2 (1–3) | 0.323 |
| Number of vaginal sex acts in the last 30 days Median (IQR) | 4 (3–8) | 6 (3–10) | 0.060 |
| * | |||
| Depo-Provera, % (n) | 71.2 (47) | 71.2 (47) | |
| Oral contraceptive, % (n) | 10.6 (7) | 13.6 (9) | |
| Nur-isterate, % (n) | 18.2 (12) | 7.6 (5) | |
| Tubal Ligation, % (n) | 0 | 7.6 (5) | |
| 0.481 | |||
| Always % (n) | 34.8 (23) | 31.8 (21) | |
| Sometimes % (n) | 59.1 (39) | 65.2 (43) | |
| Never % (n) | 6.1 (4) | 3.0 (2) | |
| Proportion HSV-2 positive % (n) | 75.4 (49) | 64.6 (42) | 0.26 |
IQR, interquartile range. HSV-2, Herpes simplex virus-2. A p-value of < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
*The Bowker test of symmetry failed as there were no events hence the p-value could not be computed.
Figure 1Comparison of mucosal immunoglobulin IgG subclasses and isotypes (Log10 ng/ml) between matched controls and cases pre-HIV infection. Each data point represents an individual sample. Cases represent women who subsequently became HIV-infected, and controls represent women who remained HIV-uninfected. The scatter dot plot includes the medians and interquartile ranges. Wilcoxon signed rank test and paired t-tests were used to compare between the case-matched-control groups and p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Figure 2Comparison of mucosal IgG subclasses and isotypes in women stratified for presence of genital inflammation (GI+) or absence of genital inflammation (GI−) within cases [GI+ (n = 18) and GI− (n = 48)] and controls [GI+ (n = 8) and GI− (n = 58)] pre-HIV infection. Each data point represents an individual sample, the line-bars represents medians and interquartile ranges. Mann–Whitney U test and unpaired t-tests were used to compare between groups and p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Black circle represents cases and black triangle represents controls.
Figure 3Associations between genital cytokines and mucosal IgG1 (A), IgG2 (B), IgG3 (C), IgG4 (D), IgM (E) and IgA (F). β-coefficients and p-values were determined using multivariable linear mixed models with a random effect of the matched pairs (N = 132). The multivariable models were adjusted for age, HSV-2 status, the number of vaginal sex acts, contraceptive method, condom use, tenofovir use and HIV infection status. β-coefficients are indicated by shaded circles and error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. P-values < 0.05 are represented by *, and those p-values that are significant after multiple comparisons adjustment are represented by #.