| Literature DB >> 34873251 |
Zhengquan Xu1,2, Lanhua Chen3, Changsheng Wang1,2, Liqun Zhang1,2, Weihong Xu4,5.
Abstract
We sought to investigate the outcomes of posterior-only approach using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage combined with single-segment instrumentation (modified-approach) for mono-segment lumbar tuberculosis in children. Between February 2008 and August 2017 in our hospital, 18 children with single-segment lumbar tuberculosis enrolled in this study were treated by modified-approach. Medical records and radiographs were retrospectively analyzed. Mean follow-up time was 54.6 ± 12.1 months. No severe complications were noted to have occurred. Measures indicated there was satisfactory bone fusion for all patients. Mean Cobb angles were significantly decreased from preoperative angle (19.8° ± 13.1°) to those both postoperatively (- 4.9° ± 7.6°) and at final follow-up (- 3.5° ± 7.3°) (both P < 0.05), with a mean angle loss of 1.7° ± 0.9°. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) returned to normal levels for all patients within 3 months postoperatively. All patients had significant postoperative improvement in neurological performance. The modified-approach was an effective and feasible treatment option for mono-segment children with lumbar tuberculosis. Such procedures can likely help patients by increasing retainment of lumbar mobility and reducing invasiveness.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34873251 PMCID: PMC8648756 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03029-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinical data of patients and outcome.
| Case no | Age (years) | Gender | Level | Operative time (min) | Blood loss (ml) | ESR (mm/h) | Follow-up time (months) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-op | TMP* | |||||||
| 1 | 6 | F | L4–5 | 110 | 330 | 65 | 11 | 56 |
| 2 | 12 | M | L3–4 | 90 | 250 | 43 | 8 | 49 |
| 3 | 14 | M | L4–5 | 105 | 285 | 44 | 6 | 44 |
| 4 | 11 | M | L1–2 | 75 | 200 | 74 | 14 | 63 |
| 5 | 7 | F | L3–4 | 115 | 320 | 28 | 5 | 71 |
| 6 | 15 | M | L2–3 | 85 | 265 | 53 | 10 | 42 |
| 7 | 9 | M | L3–4 | 80 | 240 | 38 | 11 | 39 |
| 8 | 8 | M | L4–5 | 100 | 295 | 31 | 12 | 54 |
| 9 | 11 | F | L3–4 | 85 | 300 | 42 | 5 | 74 |
| 10 | 13 | M | L1–3 | 110 | 310 | 57 | 3 | 48 |
| 11 | 8 | F | L5–S1 | 85 | 265 | 81 | 9 | 56 |
| 12 | 9 | M | L2–3 | 80 | 250 | 49 | 7 | 84 |
| 13 | 12 | F | L4–5 | 90 | 275 | 62 | 10 | 62 |
| 14 | 14 | F | L2–3 | 100 | 300 | 48 | 9 | 46 |
| 15 | 11 | M | L2–4 | 140 | 235 | 75 | 11 | 52 |
| 16 | 9 | F | L4–5 | 115 | 320 | 64 | 13 | 58 |
| 17 | 10 | F | L1–2 | 95 | 360 | 58 | 6 | 41 |
| 18 | 15 | M | L3–4 | 130 | 245 | 46 | 12 | 44 |
| Mean | 10.5 ± 2.4 | 99.4 ± 17.5 | 280.3 ± 39.1 | 53.2 ± 14.6 | 9.0 ± 3.0 | 54.6 ± 12.1 | ||
Pre-op pre-operative, TMP three months post-operative.
*Compared with pre-operative value, P < 0.05.
Radiological examination and neurological function of patients.
| Case no | Cobb angle (°) | ASIA | VAS | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-op | Post-op* | FFU# | Correction | LC | Pre-op | Post-op | FFU | Pre-op | FFU** | |
| 1 | 31 | 4 | 6 | 27 | 2 | D | E | E | 6 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | − 10 | − 10 | 12 | 0 | E | E | E | 4 | 0 |
| 3 | 27 | − 4 | − 2 | 31 | 2 | D | E | E | 6 | 2 |
| 4 | 32 | 1 | 3 | 31 | 2 | C | D | E | 8 | 1 |
| 5 | 16 | − 11 | − 10 | 27 | 1 | E | E | E | 5 | 1 |
| 6 | 28 | 4 | 5 | 24 | 1 | E | E | E | 7 | 0 |
| 7 | 21 | − 8 | − 6 | 29 | 2 | D | E | E | 6 | 0 |
| 8 | 29 | − 7 | − 4 | 36 | 3 | E | E | E | 4 | 1 |
| 9 | 34 | 6 | 8 | 28 | 2 | C | D | E | 7 | 1 |
| 10 | − 6 | − 16 | − 15 | 10 | 1 | E | E | E | 5 | 2 |
| 11 | 33 | 3 | 4 | 30 | 1 | C | C | D | 7 | 1 |
| 12 | − 2 | − 20 | − 17 | 22 | 3 | E | E | E | 6 | 1 |
| 13 | 32 | − 3 | − 2 | 29 | 1 | D | E | E | 8 | 0 |
| 14 | 26 | − 6 | − 5 | 32 | 1 | D | E | E | 8 | 2 |
| 15 | 12 | − 2 | − 4 | 14 | 2 | E | E | E | 5 | 1 |
| 16 | − 2 | − 18 | − 15 | 16 | 3 | E | E | E | 7 | 1 |
| 17 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 1 | C | D | E | 5 | 0 |
| 18 | 18 | − 2 | 1 | 20 | 3 | D | E | E | 5 | 0 |
| Mean | 19.8 ± 13.1 | − 4.9 ± 7.6 | − 3.5 ± 7.3 | 24.1 ± 7.6 | 1.7 ± 0.9 | 6.1 ± 1.3 | 0.9 ± 0.7 | |||
Pre-op pre-operative, Post-op post-operative, FFU final follow-up, LC loss of correction.
*Compared with pre-operative value, P < 0.05; #Compared with pre-operative value, P < 0.05;
**Compared with pre-operative value, P < 0.05.
Figure 1A 12-year-old boy with spinal tuberculosis in L3 to L4 underwent posterior-only approach using PEEK cage combined with single-segment instrumentation. (a–e) Preoperative images showing the collapse of vertebral body and imbalanced spinal growth. (f–g) Postoperative radiograph revealing good internal fixation and correction of imbalanced spine. (h–j) 49-month follow-up images depicting internal fixation in a good position and solid bone fusion.