| Literature DB >> 34873192 |
Alfredo Galindo-Uribarri1,2, Yuan Liu3,4, Elisa Romero Romero5,6,7, Daniel W Stracener8.
Abstract
Three-step resonance photoionization spectra of plutonium have been studied with Ti:Sapphire lasers for the development of efficient laser ionization schemes for ultra-trace analysis of Pu isotopes by resonance ionization mass spectrometry. We observed eighteen intermediate excited states of even parity in the energy range 35568-36701 [Formula: see text], thirteen of them have not been previously documented, and a larger number of high-lying excited states and autoionizing states of odd-parity between 48238 and 49510 [Formula: see text]. Three-color, three-photon ionization schemes via six intermediate states were evaluated under similar ion source operating conditions. This led to a highly efficient three-step scheme with an overall ionization efficiency of [Formula: see text], which is an order of magnitude improvement over the previously reported ionization efficiency for Pu.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34873192 PMCID: PMC8648762 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01886-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Schematic view of the experimental setup.
Figure 2Three-step ionization scheme for Pu investigated. The first excited state energy 23765.98(2) is from Ref.[26] and the IP value is from the NIST database[43]. The laser wavelength is in vacuum.
Measured resonance centroids and energy positions of the intermediate excited states of even-parity observed in scans.
| Peak # | Centroid ( | E | Refs.[ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E ( | J | ||||
| 1* | 11802.75(2) | 847.26 | 35568.73(3) | 35568.70(3) | 2 |
| 2* | 12024.67(4) | 831.62 | 35790.65(4) | ||
| 3 | 12160.72(4) | 822.32 | 35926.70(4) | ||
| 4* | 12211.30(4) | 818.91 | 35977.28(4) | ||
| 5 | 12264.24(4) | 815.38 | 36030.22(4) | ||
| 6 | 12371.68(4) | 808.30 | 36137.66(4) | 36137.60 | 2 |
| 7 | 12455.62(4) | 802.85 | 36221.60(4) | ||
| 8* | 12547.64(4) | 796.96 | 36313.62(4) | ||
| 9 | 12570.12(4) | 795.54 | 36336.10(4) | ||
| 10 | 12577.22(2) | 795.09 | 36343.20(3) | 36343.05 | 0 |
| 11 | 12602.38(5) | 793.50 | 36368.36(5) | ||
| 12 | 12685.63(3) | 788.29 | 36451.61(3) | ||
| 13* | 12686.36(3) | 788.25 | 36452.34(3) | ||
| 14 | 12736.96(3) | 785.12 | 36502.94(3) | 36502.88 | 2 |
| 15 | 12790.12(3) | 781.85 | 36556.10(4) | ||
| 16 | 12843.84(3) | 778.58 | 36609.82(4) | 36609.74 | 2 |
| 17* | 12923.51(3) | 773.78 | 36689.49(3) | ||
| 18* | 12934.51(3) | 773.13 | 36700.50(3) | ||
The last two columns are the energy and J values of the known levels for Pu from direct measurement[26] and the Pu isotope shifts[36].
Seven resonances that were clearly visible in the first scan with = 761.95 nm were chosen as SES for further investigation of three-step schemes, as marked with (*).
Figure 3Three-step photoionization spectra excited from four selected SES (#1–#4). Inverted red triangle are selected lines for further evaluation. In the top plot, red star is the line at = 767.53 nm.
Figure 4Three-step photoionization spectra excited from selected SES #5–#7. Inverted red triangle are selected lines for further evaluation.
Comparison of the strong resonances from selected SESs with relative ion intensity normalized to the first scheme.
| SES ( | Step 3 ( | Total E ( | Rel. int. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35568.73(3) | 847.26 | 13329.10(3) | 750.24 | 48897.83(4) | 1 |
| 35790.65(4) | 831.62 | 12806.93(2) | 780.83 | 48597.58(5) | 1.2 |
| 831.62 | 12875.04(2) | 776.70 | 48665.68(5) | 1.1 | |
| 35977.28(4) | 818.91 | 12613.62(2) | 792.79 | 48590.90(5) | 4.5 |
| 818.91 | 12659.64(2) | 789.91 | 48636.92(5) | 4.0 | |
| 36313.62(4) | 796.96 | 12594.47(2) | 794.00 | 48908.07(5) | 4.2 |
| 796.96 | 12707.15(2) | 786.96 | 49020.77(5) | 4.1 | |
| 36452.34(3) | 788.25 | 12306.02(2) | 812.61 | 48758.29(6) | 4.1 |
| 36689.49(3) | 773.78 | 12751.88(2) | 784.20 | 49441.36(4) | 2.6 |
| 773.78 | 12520.34(2) | 798.70 | 49209.82(4) | 2.5 | |
| 773.78 | 12545.75(2) | 797.08 | 49235.23(4) | 2.1 |
The first excitation was the same for all the schemes (Fig. 2).
Figure 5Time evolution of the efficiency measurement with a sample of atoms of Pu. The blue line shows the Pu ion current measured. The sample was gradually heated and the ion signal was recorded as a function of time. The surface ionization (non-resonant background) was measured by blocking the lasers (red points). The green line shows the heating current from 210 to 400 A. The corresponding cavity temperature was estimated in the range of 1435–2200 K.
Figure 6Measured saturation curves for step 1 ( = 402.77 nm), step 2 ( = 818.92 nm), and step 3 ( = 792.79 nm) excitations. The error bars represent one standard deviation of the measurement uncertainty.