Literature DB >> 34872758

Commentary: Lung cancer resections during the pandemic.

Rohit Shenoy1, Ikenna Okereke2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34872758      PMCID: PMC8641923          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.11.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   6.439


× No keyword cloud information.
Rohit Shenoy, MD, and Ikenna Okereke, MD Patients who underwent resection for lung cancer were not at increased risk for contracting COVID-19 during the pandemic. Postoperative COVID infection has a 40% mortality warranting close follow-up. See Article page 378. The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant effect on health care delivery systems across the country. Because of the need to allocate resources adequately, only selected elective surgeries were performed during parts of the pandemic. The time-sensitive nature of pulmonary resections for lung cancer meant that many of these cases were given priority. This study by Villena-Vargas and colleagues aims to highlight the safety of lung cancer surgery at a New York hospital during the worst period of the pandemic. The location of this study is important because New York was one of the earliest and most affected regions of the country during this pandemic. The authors compared 2 groups—the first group representing patients in the 3 months immediately preceding the pandemic and the second group representing patients receiving operations between March 2020 and June 2020. Most of the patients in both groups underwent minimally invasive surgery with comparable oncologic parameters on final pathologic review. There was a relatively low rate of 90-day COVID-19 infection, with only 3 of 41 patients who received their operation during the pandemic period developing disease. Two of these 3 patients ultimately died of COVID-19. This study highlights the fact that surgery can be performed safely during a pandemic, but there are many additional factors that need to be known. First, this study was very small. Second, the rate at which operations were done was much lower than in the prepandemic period. Although it seems that surgery can be performed safely, there are still questions about which patients should be deferred. Third, since this study was performed the vaccine was developed and distributed. Decision-making about eligibility for surgery has changed dramatically since 2020 with the availability of the vaccine. The decision to delay an operation is not trivial. Some high-risk patients requiring surgery for lung cancer might occasionally require intensive care unit admission and need for mechanical ventilation. In the setting of an ongoing pandemic, prolonged ventilation is not ideal for multiple reasons. However, delays in operation for lung cancer might be associated with upstaging of disease and decreased median survival. Going forward, our specialty will need to determine which patients can receive operations safely during a major public health crisis. We have learned some lessons from the past 20 months, but ongoing studies are needed for more detailed recommendations. I applaud the authors for continuing the essential service of cancer surgery during the worst pandemic of our lifetimes…so far. As climate change continues to occur, we should expect that we will face future infectious disease catastrophes. The authors do acknowledge that their study was limited by a small sample size. In addition, this study was performed before development of the vaccine. Nevertheless, we can learn some lessons from their article. It does appear that with appropriate patient selection, cancer surgery can be performed during a pandemic with a low transmission rate.
  5 in total

1.  Effects of Delayed Surgical Resection on Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes in Clinical Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Pamela Samson; Aalok Patel; Tasha Garrett; Traves Crabtree; Daniel Kreisel; A Sasha Krupnick; G Alexander Patterson; Stephen Broderick; Bryan F Meyers; Varun Puri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Safety of lung cancer surgery during COVID-19 in a pandemic epicenter.

Authors:  Jonathan Villena-Vargas; Evan M Lutton; Nathan Mynard; Abu Nasar; Francesca Voza; Oliver Chow; Benjamin Lee; Sebron Harrison; Brendon M Stiles; Jeffrey L Port; Nasser K Altorki
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.439

Review 3.  Climate change and infectious diseases in Europe.

Authors:  Jan C Semenza; Bettina Menne
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Patients with Cancer Appear More Vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2: A Multicenter Study during the COVID-19 Outbreak.

Authors:  Mengyuan Dai; Dianbo Liu; Miao Liu; Fuxiang Zhou; Guiling Li; Zhen Chen; Zhian Zhang; Hua You; Meng Wu; Qichao Zheng; Yong Xiong; Huihua Xiong; Chun Wang; Changchun Chen; Fei Xiong; Yan Zhang; Yaqin Peng; Siping Ge; Bo Zhen; Tingting Yu; Ling Wang; Hua Wang; Yu Liu; Yeshan Chen; Junhua Mei; Xiaojia Gao; Zhuyan Li; Lijuan Gan; Can He; Zhen Li; Yuying Shi; Yuwen Qi; Jing Yang; Daniel G Tenen; Li Chai; Lorelei A Mucci; Mauricio Santillana; Hongbing Cai
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 39.397

5.  COVID-19: New York City pandemic notes from the first 30 days.

Authors:  Stefan Flores; Nicholas Gavin; Marie-Laure Romney; Christopher Tedeschi; Erica Olsen; Anisa Heravian; Liliya Abrukin; David Kessler; Angela M Mills; Bernard P Chang
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.469

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.