| Literature DB >> 34872459 |
Qiang Su1,2, Qiao Liu3, Juan Liu4, Lingyun Fu5, Tao Liu2,6, Jing Liang1,2, Hong Peng7, Xue Pan8.
Abstract
The occurrence of antituberculosis drug-induced liver injury affects the effectiveness of antituberculosis treatments. Understanding the mechanism and risk factors of such liver injury may improve the outcomes of those patients who received antituberculosis treatments. In this study, 2,255 pulmonary tuberculosis patients were included. Their medical records were reviewed, questionnaire surveys, liver function tests at the end of February (including patients with uncomfortable symptoms during the intensive treatment period), and blood samples were saved. Afterward, cases of liver damage were determined using Chinese liver damage criteria. The genotype of all participants was determined using the PCR-LDR method. Finally, the association between genetic polymorphism and ATB-DILI susceptibility was assessed using the univariate Logistic regression models. Among the 2,255 tuberculosis patients who received rifampicin, 612 (27.1%) had antituberculosis drug-induced liver injury. We observed higher proportions of older age, male, and lower levels of AST, ALT, and TBil among patients with liver injury. Results of univariate of logistic regression models showed that patients with CYP2C19 were more likely to have liver injury compared with no such genotypes patients (all P < 0.05). Patients with tuberculosis with older age and genetic polymorphism of CYP3A4, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 who received long-term rifampicin treatment were more likely to have antituberculosis drug-induced liver injury. It is important for healthcare providers to carefully evaluate and monitor rifampicin use for these patients.Entities:
Keywords: Tuberculosis; gene polymorphisms; liver damage; rifampicin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34872459 PMCID: PMC8810084 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.2003930
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Primer sequences
| Primers | Forward | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
| CYP3A4 *5 | TGCATTTTCTGCGTGACAGAAG | AGGAACGAAATGATGTGGTTAT |
| CYP3A4 *18 | AAGTGATTTGGCTGGATTG | AGACCCTCTTCCACCTTCT |
| CYP2C9 *2 | TCAGAGTTTCTGGGGAAGC | GAGGGTAGAGAGGATATCTGATA |
| CYP2C9 *13 | TTGCTCGAGGACAAGTTC | TCTGATTTGGGGACCACAG |
| CYP2C19 *2 | AGCTGCACTGTGACAAGCT | CATTCGTCTGTTTCCCATT |
| CYP2C19 *3 | CATTTTCTGCTTGACAGAAGA | GGAACAAAATGATGTGGTTAT |
General comparison of ATB-Dili and control group
| Features | Case | Control | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case | 612 (27.1) | 1643 (72.9) | |
| Men | 362 (59.2) | 1049 (63.8) | 0.04 |
| Age | 73.28 (12.92) | 67.55 (12.51) | <0.001 |
| Age groups | <0.001 | ||
| <60 | 80 (13.1) | 422 (25.7) | |
| 60– | 131 (21.4) | 467 (28.4) | |
| 70– | 175 (28.6) | 436 (26.5) | |
| 80– | 226 (36.9) | 318 (19.4) | |
| BMI, mean (SD), kg/m2 | 24.57 (4.56) | 24.84 (4.27) | 0.494 |
| Smoking in past/now | 220 (36.1) | 693 (42.4) | 0.506 |
| Drinking in past/now | 64 (10.5) | 252 (15.5) | 0.473 |
| AST (U/L) | 1.24 (0.76) | 1.43 (0.93) | <0.001 |
| ALT (U/L) | 1.09 (0.63) | 1.09 (0.57) | 0.026 |
| TBil (U/L) | 2.70 (0.98) | 2.73 (1.00) | 0.015 |
Abbreviations: ATB-DILI, anti-TB drug-induced liver injury; BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase.
Figure 1.Detection of SNP PCR product in agarose gel electrophoresis
Figure 2.DNA sequencing peak chromatograms for the CYP3A4, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 genotyping, dotted line indicates the mutation site: (a) CYP3A4 polymorphism, (b) CYP2C9 polymorphism, (c) CYP2C19 polymorphism
Hardy–Weinberg test of the genotype distribution of polymorphic loci in the control group
| Polymorphic site | Actual frequency | Theoretical frequency | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CYP3A4 | |||
| T | 110.54 (65.75) | 103.28 (64.43) | 0.019 |
| CT | 137.51 (5.80) | 138.15 (8.97) | 0.106 |
| CC | 4.26 (1.19) | 4.35 (1.26) | 0.141 |
| C | 9.01 (4.22) | 7.82 (3.06) | <0.001 |
| CYP2C9 | |||
| GG | 214.39 (83.14) | 207.12 (72.23) | 0.044 |
| GA | 74.67 (40.96) | 80.35 (36.98) | 0.002 |
| A | 4940 (9194) | 28,545 (5218) | <0.001 |
| G | 226 (36.9) | 318 (19.4) | 0.374 |
| CYP2C19 | |||
| GA | 24.57 (4.56) | 24.84 (4.27) | 0.494 |
| AA | 220 (36.1) | 693 (42.4) | <0.001 |
| G | 64 (10.5) | 252 (15.5) | 0.473 |
| GG | 2.70 (0.98) | 2.73 (1.00) | 0.015 |
Genotype distribution of RIF polymorphic loci
| Clinical prognosis | Case | Control | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYP3A4 | ||||
| T | 133 (21.7) | 202 (12.3) | 1.981 (1.555, 2.523) | 0.144 |
| CT | 156 (25.6) | 260 (15.8) | 1.820 (1.453, 2.279) | 0.245 |
| CC | 75 (12.3) | 128 (7.8) | 1.653 (1.223, 2.235) | 0.04 |
| C | 139 (22.7) | 303 (18.4) | 1.300 (1.036, 1.630) | 0.073 |
| CYP2C9 | ||||
| GG | 142 (23.2) | 321 (19.5) | 1.244 (0.995, 1.556) | <0.001 |
| GA | 155 (25.3) | 358 (21.8) | 1.217 (0.980, 1.512) | <0.001 |
| A | 199 (32.5) | 347 (21.1) | 1.800 (1.464, 2.212) | <0.001 |
| G | 156 (25.6) | 260 (15.8) | 1.820 (1.453, 2.279) | <0.001 |
| CYP2C19 | ||||
| GA | 64 (10.5) | 94 (5.7) | 1.925 (1.380, 2.683) | 0.053 |
| AA | 99 (16.2) | 167 (10.2) | 1.706 (1.304, 2.230) | 0.481 |
| G | 116 (19.0) | 215 (13.1) | 1.553 (1.212, 1.990) | 0.653 |
| GG | 199 (32.5) | 347 (21.1) | 1.800 (1.464, 2.212) | 0.287 |
Abbreviations: RIF, rifampicin; CI, confidence interval.
The genotypes of RIF polymorphism loci, the association between different genetic models and ATB-Dili
| Polymorphic site | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|
| CYP3A4 | |
| T | 1.609 (1.082,2.391) |
| CT | 1.454 (1.067,1.982) |
| CC | 1.139 (0.902,1.438) |
| C | 1.111 (0.883,1.399) |
| CYP2C9 | |
| CT | 1.198 (1.079,1.372) |
| GA | 1.214 (1.096,1.535) |
| A | 1.475 (0.952,2.284) |
| G | 1.540 (1.094,2.168) |
| CYP2C19 | |
| GA | 1.394 (1.057,1.838) |
| AA | 1.264 (0.978,1.633) |
| G | 1.609 (1.082,2.391) |
| GG | 1.454 (1.067,1.982) |
Abbreviations: ATB-DILI, Anti-TB drug-induced liver injury; OR, odds ratio; RIF, rifampicin; CI, confidence interval.