| Literature DB >> 34871205 |
Wei Yang1, Jia Xi2, Lingxin Guo3, Zhefei Cao2.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Women with ovarian cancer are reported to fatigue over time. Moderate to severe levels of cancer-related fatigue is fluent in Han Chinese patients with cancer. Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines are recommending exercise and cognitive behavioral therapy to reduce cancer-related fatigue. Exercise is an easy, cost-effective, and non-pharmacological approach. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led exercise and cognitive-behavioral care against nurse-led usual care in Han Chinese women of ovarian cancer regarding cancer-related fatigue, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality.Han Chinese women with moderate to severe levels of cancer-related fatigue have received 30 minutes, 5 times/week nurse-led exercise and 60 min/week cognitive-behavioral care (EC cohort, n = 118) or nurse-led usual care regarding educations and recommendations only (UC cohort, n = 126) or have not received nurse-led exercise, cognitive-behavioral care, educations, and recommendations (NC cohort, n = 145) between and after chemotherapy cycles. The Piper Fatigue Scale, the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaires were evaluated at the start and the end of non-pharmacological treatment.At the end of treatment as compared to the start of treatment, only women of EC cohort had decrease Piper Fatigue Scale (5.40 ± 1.49/woman vs 6.06 ± 1.49/woman, P < .0001, q = 4.973) and Zung Self-rating Depression Scale score (48.67 ± 4.24/woman vs 49.93 ± 4.29/woman, P = .001, q = 3.449). Also, at the end of treatment, as compared to the start of treatment, only women of EC cohort have increased Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score (14.76 ± 2.18/woman vs 13.94 ± 2.90/woman, P = .045, q = 3.523). Only exercise and cognitive-behavioral care were successful in a decrease in the numbers of women with depression (the Mandarin Chinese version of the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale score >53, 32 vs 16, P = .015).Nurse-led exercise and cognitive-behavioral care can help Han Chinese women with ovarian cancer to decrease cancer-related fatigue and depression. Also, it can improve the quality of sleep.Evidence Level: 4.Technical Efficacy: Stage 5.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34871205 PMCID: PMC8568398 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027317
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1The flow diagram for management of cancer-related fatigue between and after chemotherapy cycles of Han Chinese women with ovarian cancer.
Demographical, social, and clinical conditions of Han Chinese women at the start of non-pharmacological treatment for cancer-related fatigue.
| Cohorts | ||||
| Parameters | EC | UC | NC | |
| Non-pharmacological treatment | Exercise and cognitive-behavioral care | Usual care | Nothing | Comparisons |
| Numbers of women | 118 | 126 | 145 | |
| Age (yrs) | ||||
| Minimum | 30 | 31 | 30 | .178 |
| Maximum | 66 | 66 | 65 | |
| Mean ± SD | 44.21 ± 8.12 | 45.22 ± 9.23 | 46.18 ± 8.24 | |
| Educational level | ||||
| Very primitive | 23 (19) | 16 (13) | 21 (15) | .537 |
| School level | 75 (64) | 81 (64) | 93 (64) | |
| Graduate or more | 20 (17) | 29 (23) | 31 (21) | |
| Family caregivers | ||||
| Husband | 85 (72) | 91 (72) | 97 (67) | .551 |
| Other | 33 (28) | 35 (28) | 48 (33) | |
| Marital status | ||||
| Married | 107 (91) | 111 (88) | 131 (90) | .764 |
| Single | 11 (9) | 15 (12) | 14 (10) | |
| Occupation status | ||||
| Working women | 73 (62) | 75 (60) | 88 (61) | .932 |
| House-wife | 45 (38) | 51 (40) | 57 (39) | |
| Menopausal status | ||||
| Pre-menopausal | 49 (42) | 54 (43) | 64 (44) | .913 |
| Postmenopausal | 69 (58) | 72 (57) | 81 (56) | |
| Smoking status | ||||
| No smoker | 103 (87) | 108 (86) | 125 (86) | .962 |
| Previous smoker | 10 (9) | 11 (9) | 11 (8) | |
| Current smoker | 5 (4) | 7 (5) | 9 (6) | |
| Cancer stage | .172 | |||
| I | 14 (12) | 14 (11) | 15 (10) | |
| II | 33 (28) | 32 (25) | 42 (29) | |
| III | 46 (39) | 42 (34) | 65 (45) | |
| IV | 25 (21) | 38 (30) | 23 (16) | |
| Presence of 1 or more comorbidity | ||||
| Yes | 93 (79) | 95 (75) | 113 (78) | .799 |
| No | 25 (21) | 31 (25) | 32 (22) | |
Continuous variables are demonstrated as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and constant variables are demonstrated as frequency (percentages).
One-way ANOVA (for continuous variables) and chi-square test of independence (for constant variables) were used for statistical analyses.
A P < .05 considered significant.
ANOVA = analysis of variance, EC cohort = women have received nurse-lead exercise and cognitive-behavioral care in between and after chemotherapy cycles, NC cohort = women have not received nurse-lead exercise and cognitive-behavioral care or usual care in between and after chemotherapy cycles, P value = measure of the probability, UC cohort = women have received usual care in between and after chemotherapy cycles.
Cancer-related fatigue, depressive symptoms, and quality of sleep of Han Chinese women at the start and at the end of non-pharmacological treatment.
| Cohorts | Comparisons | ||||||||||||||||
| Parameters | EC | UC | NC | At BL | At EL | ||||||||||||
| Non-pharmacological treatment | Exercise and cognitive-behavioral care | Usual care | Nothing | ||||||||||||||
| Level | BL | EL | BL | EL | BL | EL | EC vs UC | EC vs NC | UC vs NC | ||||||||
| Numbers of women | 118 | 118 | 126 | 126 | 145 | 145 | |||||||||||
| The Mandarin Chinese version of the Piper Fatigue Scale score | |||||||||||||||||
| Minimum | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Maximum | 9 | 8 | <.0001 | 4.973 | 9 | 8 | .128 | N/A | 9 | 8 | .071 | N/A | .124 | <.0001 | 3.642 | 9.219 | 5.554 |
| Mean ± SD | 6.06 ± 1.49 | 5.40 ± 1.49 | 6.17 ± 1.64 | 5.80 ± 1.23 | 6.43 ± 1.42 | 6.39 ± 1.27 | |||||||||||
| The Mandarin Chinese version of the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale score | |||||||||||||||||
| Minimum | 40 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 40 | 40 | |||||||||||
| Maximum | 57 | 56 | .001 | 3.449 | 56 | 55 | .371 | N/A | 56 | 56 | .979 | N/A | .317 | .002 | 4.852 | 3.875 | 1.159 |
| Mean ± SD | 49.93 ± 4.29 | 48.67 ± 4.24 | 50.60 ± 3.37 | 50.30 ± 3.32 | 50.01 ± 3.68 | 49.93 ± 3.57 | |||||||||||
| Numbers of women with depression (score >53) | 32 (27) | 16 (14) | .015 | N/A | 25 (20) | 22 (17) | .746 | N/A | 28 (19) | 28 (19) | 1.000 | N/A | .251 | .459 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| The Mandarin Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score | |||||||||||||||||
| Minimum | 8 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | |||||||||||
| Maximum | 18 | 9 | .045 | 3.523 | 18 | 18 | .381 | N/A | 19 | 19 | .743 | N/A | .195 | .002 | 1.764 | 4.889 | 3.122 |
| Mean ± SD | 13.94 ± 2.90 | 14.76 ± 2.18 | 14.29 ± 2.48 | 14.37 ± 2.33 | 13.70 ± 2.75 | 13.71 ± 2.72 | |||||||||||
Continuous variables are demonstrated as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and constant variables are demonstrated as frequency (percentages).
One-way ANOVA (for continuous variables) and chi-square test (for constant variables) were used for statistical analyses.
Tukey test was used for post hoc analysis.
A P < .05 and q > 3.327 (between cohorts) and >3.330 (within the cohort) considered significant.
ANOVA = analysis of variance, BL = at the start of non-pharmacological treatment, EC cohort = women have received nurse-lead exercise and cognitive-behavioral care in between and after chemotherapy cycles, EL = at the end of non-pharmacological treatment, N/A = not applicable, NC cohort = women have not received nurse-lead exercise and cognitive-behavioral care or usual care in between and after chemotherapy cycles, P value = measure of the probability, q = critical value for Tukey test, UC cohort = women have received usual care in between and after chemotherapy cycles.
Figure 2Cancer-related fatigue evaluation at different time points. The Mandarin Chinese version of the Piper Fatigue Scale score. 0: no symptom of fatigue, 1 to 3: a mild symptom of fatigue, 4 to 6: a moderate symptom of fatigue, and 7 to 10: a severe symptom of fatigue. Where 0 indicated absence and 10 indicated severely. EC cohort = women have received nurse-lead exercise and cognitive-behavioral care in between and after chemotherapy cycles, NC cohort = women have not received nurse-lead exercise and cognitive-behavioral care or usual care in between and after chemotherapy cycles, UC cohort = women have received usual care in between and after chemotherapy cycles.
Figure 3The numbers of women with depression. A score greater than 53 was considered as depression. EC cohort = women have received nurse-lead exercise and cognitive-behavioral care in between and after chemotherapy cycles, NC cohort = women have not received nurse-lead exercise and cognitive-behavioral care or usual care in between and after chemotherapy cycles, UC cohort = women have received usual care in between and after chemotherapy cycles.
Figure 4Depressive symptoms evaluation at different time points. The Mandarin Chinese version of the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale score. The total score is 80 and a score greater than 53 was considered as depression. EC cohort = women have received nurse-lead exercise and cognitive-behavioral care in between and after chemotherapy cycles, NC cohort = women have not received nurse-lead exercise and cognitive-behavioral care or usual care in between and after chemotherapy cycles, UC cohort = women have received usual care in between and after chemotherapy cycles.
Figure 5Quality of sleep evaluation at different time points. The Mandarin Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score. The score range was 0 to 21. Higher the score the higher the would-be quality of sleep. EC cohort = women have received nurse-lead exercise and cognitive-behavioral care in between and after chemotherapy cycles, NC cohort = women have not received nurse-lead exercise and cognitive-behavioral care or usual care in between and after chemotherapy cycles, UC cohort = women have received usual care in between and after chemotherapy cycles.