Literature DB >> 34871083

The Medicare Advantage Quality Bonus Program Has Not Improved Plan Quality.

Adam A Markovitz1, John Z Ayanian2, Devraj Sukul3, Andrew M Ryan4.   

Abstract

In 2012 Medicare introduced the quality bonus program, linking financial bonuses to commercial insurers' quality performance in Medicare Advantage (MA). Despite large investments in the program, evidence of its effectiveness is limited. We analyzed insurance claims from the period 2009-2018 from the nation's largest MA claims database for 3,753,117 MA beneficiaries (treatment group) and 4,025,179 commercial enrollees (control group). Using a difference-in-differences framework, we evaluated changes in performance on nine claims-based measures of quality in both groups before and after the start of the bonus program and with adjustment for differential pre-period trends. We observed no consistent differential improvement in quality for MA versus commercial enrollees under the quality bonus program. Program participation was associated with significant quality improvements among MA beneficiaries on four measures, significant declines on four other measures, and no significant change in overall quality performance (+0.6 percentage points). Together, these results suggest that the quality bonus program did not produce the intended improvement in overall quality performance of MA plans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34871083      PMCID: PMC9098184          DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  7 in total

1.  Higher Incentive Payments in Medicare Advantage's Pay-for-Performance Program Did Not Improve Quality But Did Increase Plan Offerings.

Authors:  Timothy J Layton; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The Roles of Cost and Quality Information in Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollment Decisions: an Observational Study.

Authors:  Rachel O Reid; Partha Deb; Benjamin L Howell; Patrick H Conway; William H Shrank
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Comparing Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting and Instrumental Variable Methods for the Evaluation of Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Jerome J Federspiel; Kevin J Anstrom; Ying Xian; Lisa A McCoy; Mark B Effron; Douglas E Faries; Marjorie Zettler; Laura Mauri; Robert W Yeh; Eric D Peterson; Tracy Y Wang
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 14.676

4.  Now trending: Coping with non-parallel trends in difference-in-differences analysis.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Ariel Linden; James F Burgess
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-11-25       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Association between Medicare Advantage plan star ratings and enrollment.

Authors:  Rachel O Reid; Partha Deb; Benjamin L Howell; William H Shrank
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Databases for surgical health services research: Clinformatics Data Mart.

Authors:  Vidhya Gunaseelan; Brooke Kenney; Jay Soong-Jin Lee; Hsou Mei Hu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Impact of Star Rating Medication Adherence Measures on Adherence for Targeted and Nontargeted Medications.

Authors:  Natasha Parekh; Kiraat D Munshi; Inmaculada Hernandez; Walid F Gellad; Rochelle Henderson; William H Shrank
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 5.725

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Association Between Double Bonuses and Clinical and Administrative Performance in Medicare Advantage.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; Baris Gulseren; John Z Ayanian; Adam A Markovitz; David J Meyers; Erin Fuse Brown
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2022-09-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.