Soft actuators allowing multifunctional, multishape deformations based on single polymer films or bilayers remain challenging to produce. In this contribution, direct ink writing is used for generating patterned actuators, which are in between single- and bilayer films, with multifunctionality and a plurality of possible shape changes in a single object. The key is to use the controlled deposition of a light-responsive liquid crystal ink with direct ink writing to partially cover a foil at strategic locations. We found patterned films with 40% coverage of the passive substrate by an active material outperformed "standard" fully covered bilayers. By patterning the film as two stripes, a range of motions, including left- and right-handed twisting and bending in orthogonal directions, could be controllably induced in the same actuator. The partial coverage also left space for applying liquid crystal inks with other functionalities, exemplified by fabricating a light-responsive green reflective actuator whose reflection can be switched "on" and "off". The results presented here serve as a toolbox for the design and fabrication of patterned actuators with dramatically expanded shape deformation and functionality capabilities.
Soft actuators allowing multifunctional, multishape deformations based on single polymer films or bilayers remain challenging to produce. In this contribution, direct ink writing is used for generating patterned actuators, which are in between single- and bilayer films, with multifunctionality and a plurality of possible shape changes in a single object. The key is to use the controlled deposition of a light-responsive liquid crystal ink with direct ink writing to partially cover a foil at strategic locations. We found patterned films with 40% coverage of the passive substrate by an active material outperformed "standard" fully covered bilayers. By patterning the film as two stripes, a range of motions, including left- and right-handed twisting and bending in orthogonal directions, could be controllably induced in the same actuator. The partial coverage also left space for applying liquid crystal inks with other functionalities, exemplified by fabricating a light-responsive green reflective actuator whose reflection can be switched "on" and "off". The results presented here serve as a toolbox for the design and fabrication of patterned actuators with dramatically expanded shape deformation and functionality capabilities.
Significant progress
toward untethered, centimeter-scale soft actuators
triggered by external stimuli has been made,[1−4] and their appeal in robotics has
been demonstrated.[5−9] Among responsive materials, liquid crystal (LC) polymers are considered
excellent options for fabricating this class of actuators,[10−14] delivering large, rapid, and reversible preprogramed deformations
triggered by a variety of stimuli, both in wet and dry environments.[15,16] To date, there have been essentially three options for creating
these LC-based actuators. In the first option, actuators are made
from single film layers and generally only display single deformation
modes depending on the molecular alignment fixed in the network, for
example, contraction,[17] bending,[18] or twisting,[19] typically
triggered by a single stimulus. The second option is bilayer actuators
of the active LC material on a passive foil or layer, which can improve
the robustness of the device while delivering the same type of motions
as single-layer films,[20,21] although facilitating functional
combinations in a single actuator such as light and magnetic responsivity
or temperature response while having photonic properties.[22−25] The third option consists of stacking multiple layers, resulting
in a 3D object,[6,11,26−28] which can be accomplished via different fabrication
methods.[3] This latter approach has the
advantage that complex shape deformation can be accomplished that
can result in self-propulsion,[10,29] for example. However,
achieving multiple deformation modes within the same actuator remains
challenging. This calls for a new design concept that outperforms
both single- and bilayer actuators to bring untethered soft actuators
one step closer to widespread use.[30−32]Diverse motions
from a single object are achieved in nature mostly
through individual, sequential responses by discrete subunits that
form the larger object:[33] take, for example,
the rotation of human hands, which is accomplished by the contraction/expansion
of individual tendons.[34] By translating
this concept to untethered actuators, novel motions and control could
be accomplished.Patterned actuators are fabricated by selectively
depositing an
active material in specific regions atop a passive substrate. The
presence of discrete active regions on a passive layer allows the
use of less material than having to coat entire substrates, and for
individual regions of the device to be independently activated and,
as in tendons, trigger localized stresses and specific localized motions.
Patterning has been employed in bilayer films to deliver folding,[35] rolling,[36] and curling,[37] origami-like folding,[38] out-of-plane shape deformations,[39] or
to induce 2D-to-3D shape changes in films.[40] Additionally, temperature-responsive LC elastomers (LCE) acting
as a sort of “skeletal muscles” within a passive material
that triggers a shape change upon heating have also been reported.[6,41] These examples show the potential of patterning, but its use to
obtain multiple shape deformations within the same object remains
unexplored. For this goal, employing light as the trigger is appealing
because it can be rapidly, tether-lessly, and locally applied.[42]Here, we report on actuators intermediate
to single- and bilayer
films, with multifunctionality and a plurality of possible shape changes.
These light-responsive-patterned actuators fabricated via direct ink
writing (DIW) display several distinct, controlled deformation modes
on demand. To establish the potential of locally depositing actuator
material atop a passive substrate and to compare its performance to
conventional fully covered substrates, a single LCE stripe is written
on a polymer substrate and the device responsivities to both temperature
and light are characterized. Interestingly, large deformations were
triggered by both light and temperature but in opposing directions.
These findings are used to fabricate actuators with multiple LCE stripes
with different reversible and controlled shape deformations upon specific
illumination of the different light-responsive regions. Additionally,
partial coverage with an active material provides partial transparency
to the actuator and space for applying additional layers, for example,
photonic reflectors. In the latter case, we present an actuator capable
of performing two tasks simultaneously: motion and selective reflection
of different wavelengths of light.
Results and Discussion
Generating
Patterned Actuators
The patterned, light-responsive
LC actuators were prepared by DIW. The alignment of the LC mesogens,
key to the actuator’s eventual performance, is dictated by
the DIW procedure (Figure ).[3] This fabrication approach permits
the easy deposition of discrete, light-responsive regions that can
be independently triggered.[6] We selected
a thin (10 μm) uniaxially stretched polyetherimide (PEI) foil
with nanogrooves as the passive substrate (Figure S1). There is no indication that stretched PEI acts as an alignment
layer for oligomeric mesogens: alignment is solely dictated by the
relative motion of the printing head to the substrate. PEI has a storage
modulus of ca. 3000 MPa at 20 °C (Figure a) on the same order of magnitude
poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET);[21,23] it is transparent
to blue light but not ultraviolet (UV) light.
Figure 1
Scheme depicting the
synthesis of the LC ink (top) and the fabrication
process of an LC-based patterned actuator via DIW (bottom). The LC
oligomer used to prepare the ink is the result of chain extension
via a thiol-acrylate Michael addition of molecules 1–2 using 3 as a spacer. The insets show an idealized molecular
alignment at each stage.
Figure 2
Characterization of the
patterned film prepared via DIW. (a) Storage
modulus as a function of the temperature of the two layers separately.
The modulus was investigated parallel (∥) and perpendicular
(⊥) to the alignment direction of the LC and to the stretching
direction of the PEI foil. (b) Schematic representation of a patterned
film in which the different tunable design parameters are defined
(top). Yellow and light gray represents the LCE and the PEI, respectively
(bottom). A photograph of a fabricated 5 × 25 mm2 film with 40% coverage. (c) 3D profile of the edge of the printed
LCE. (d) Crossed polarized light micrographs of the printed LCE on
the foil. The black arrows represent the directions of the polarizer
(P) and analyzer (A). The white dashed lines indicate the borders
of the printed lines. The white arrows indicate the direction of printing.
The scale bar represents 500 μm.
Scheme depicting the
synthesis of the LC ink (top) and the fabrication
process of an LC-based patterned actuator via DIW (bottom). The LC
oligomer used to prepare the ink is the result of chain extension
via a thiol-acrylate Michael addition of molecules 1–2 using 3 as a spacer. The insets show an idealized molecular
alignment at each stage.Characterization of the
patterned film prepared via DIW. (a) Storage
modulus as a function of the temperature of the two layers separately.
The modulus was investigated parallel (∥) and perpendicular
(⊥) to the alignment direction of the LC and to the stretching
direction of the PEI foil. (b) Schematic representation of a patterned
film in which the different tunable design parameters are defined
(top). Yellow and light gray represents the LCE and the PEI, respectively
(bottom). A photograph of a fabricated 5 × 25 mm2 film with 40% coverage. (c) 3D profile of the edge of the printed
LCE. (d) Crossed polarized light micrographs of the printed LCE on
the foil. The black arrows represent the directions of the polarizer
(P) and analyzer (A). The white dashed lines indicate the borders
of the printed lines. The white arrows indicate the direction of printing.
The scale bar represents 500 μm.The LC oligomer was synthesized via a base-catalyzed thiol-acrylate
Michael addition reaction of 1–3 as previously
reported[44] (Figure 1, the results of the
different characterizations of the prepared oligomer may be found
in Figures S2–S4 and Tables S1 and S2 in the Supporting Informtation). The excess acrylate compared to
thiol groups resulted in acrylate-terminated oligomers with molecule 2 in the main chain; the azobenzene group is responsible for
granting the network light responsivity with its photo-induced trans-to-cis isomerization.[30] The synthesized oligomer had a number-average
molecular weight (Mn) of 7756 g mol–1 based on the 1H NMR spectrum, with a dispersity
(Đ) of 2.4 as determined using gel permeation
chromatography (GPC), and showed an isotropic-to-nematic phase transition
(TI/N) at 80 °C and a nematic-to-smectic C (N-SmC)
phase transition (TN/SmC) of 42 °C, as indicated by
the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) traces and crossed polarized
light micrographs. The LC ink for the DIW process was prepared by
mixing the LC oligomer (98 wt %) with a photoinitiator (2 wt % 4).The patterning process on PEI foils was first optimized.
The influence
of the printing direction on the mesogenic alignment, either parallel
or perpendicular to the stretching direction of the PEI, was investigated
(Figure S5) with the reservoir set to 70
°C and the printing bed to 20 °C. At these temperatures,
printing at a speed of 7 mm s–1 with a 335 μm
diameter nozzle invariably resulted in uniaxially aligned lines, independent
of the underlying PEI stretching direction. These results verify that
the PEI foil is not acting as an alignment layer, and the mesogenic
alignment is determined solely by the DIW process, as expected.After printing, the formation of the LCE network was initiated
using high-intensity UV light at room temperature under N2. Sol/gel fraction experiments revealed an average 85% gel fraction
for the LCE. Copolymerization of acrylate groups generally results
in higher fractional network formations, but the high viscosity and
the long oligomeric chains (ca. 9 units) of this
system reduce the mobility of the radicals and lower the cross-link
density, respectively, resulting in a reduced gel fraction.With the printing parameters optimized, we deposited a single 2
× 35 mm2 (w × l) LCE stripe on a PEI foil (10 × 10 × 0.001 cm3). After photopolymerization, a laser cutter was employed to extract
a 5 × 25 mm2 film with the LCE rectangle situated
along the center of the PEI (Figure b). As a result, the PEI film had 40% of its area covered
by the LCE. We observed that in some cases the films showed a prebend
when suspended. We hypothesize that the prebend is a consequence of
the high temperature experienced by the films during laser cutting
because bare laser-cut PEI films having the same dimensions also showed
prebends: a linear relationship between the prebend and laser intensity
was observed (Figures S6 and S7). Furthermore,
characterization of the patterned film revealed that the thickness
of the deposited LCE averaged to 90 μm, as determined by an
optical profiling system (Figure c). Across the 3D profile, the active area shows an
undulating topography, with each “wave” representing
one of the deposited filaments that constitute the LCE stripe. The
birefringence of the active layer was observed between crossed polarizers
(Figure d): the LCE
stripe appeared darker when oriented parallel to the polarizer or
analyzer than when at 45°. This dark–bright state indicates
a uniaxially oriented LCE:[3] in this case,
the mesogenic alignment was parallel to the longitudinal axis.
Temperature
Response
The response of the 5 × 25
mm2, 40% covered, and 90 μm LCE film (Figure b) to temperature was evaluated
(Figure a). Upon increasing
the temperature from 25 to 110 °C, the film initially bent, and
then started to tightly roll up above 80 °C, with the LCE inside
the curvature. Such a response is not surprising as uniaxially aligned
LCEs are known to display large, anisotropic shape deformations (ca. 50%),[3,16] contracting along and expanding
perpendicular to the alignment direction (Figure S8). The temperature response arises from the increasing disorder
of the mesogenic groups with increasing temperature as the network
undergoes phase transitions. Upon heating, the network transitions
from the SmC-to-N phase around 45 °C, and from the N-to-isotropic
phase around 94 °C (Figure S9), explaining
the two stages of the response seen both in Figure a and in Figure S8. Bare PEI itself does not show any shape changes within the evaluated
temperature range (Figures S8 and S10).
Hence, as previously observed for bilayers, when one of the layers
experiences a contraction or expansion along the longitudinal axis,
the system bends parallel or perpendicular to it, respectively.[45] Thanks to the large contraction of LCEs, the
film’s final configuration is a tight roll. In comparison,
highly cross-linked LC network (LCN) bilayer films (LCNs characteristically
having 10% contraction due to their higher crosslink density)[3,16] typically only bend up to a full rotation,[18] and generally do not tightly roll up unless they have a wedge geometry.[46]
Figure 3
Stimuli response of a patterned actuator (5 × 25
mm2, 40% coverage, and 90 μm of an LCE on PEI, Figure b). (a) Edge-on images
of the
film at different temperatures. The blue dashed lines represent the
shape of the film at 25 °C. Scale bar represents 1 mm. (b) Edge-on
images displaying the light-driven bending motion of the patterned
film to 365 nm (80 mW cm–2) and 455 nm light (145
mW cm–2). (c) Tip displacement as a function of
time. Positive values mean that the tip bent away from its starting
position, that is, from the light source, and negative when bent toward
the light.
Stimuli response of a patterned actuator (5 × 25
mm2, 40% coverage, and 90 μm of an LCE on PEI, Figure b). (a) Edge-on images
of the
film at different temperatures. The blue dashed lines represent the
shape of the film at 25 °C. Scale bar represents 1 mm. (b) Edge-on
images displaying the light-driven bending motion of the patterned
film to 365 nm (80 mW cm–2) and 455 nm light (145
mW cm–2). (c) Tip displacement as a function of
time. Positive values mean that the tip bent away from its starting
position, that is, from the light source, and negative when bent toward
the light.
Light Response
Photoactuation of a patterned actuator
can be characterized either in air or underwater because the chosen
LCE performs in either of these media.[44] Systematic studies of the photoactuation in air can be difficult,
as both photomechanical and photothermal effects influence the actuation
(Figures S11 and S14);[47] consequently, the light response was investigated underwater
where photomechanical effects dominate. The 5 × 25 mm2, 40% covered, and 90 μm LCE-patterned film (Figure b) was suspended in 19 °C
water as shown in Figure S11: at this temperature,
the LCE is in its SmC phase. When irradiated with a 365 nm light emitting
diode (LED) (80 mW cm–2), the film bent away from
the light source (Figure b and Movie S1), an expected performance
for this LCE. The bending away motion is the result of a photo-induced
SmC-to-smectic A (SmC-SmA) phase transition and ca. 4% expansion parallel to the alignment direction.[44] A stationary state was attained after 10 min of illumination,
after which the light was switched off. Because of the photomechanical
nature of the response, the deformation was only reversed when illuminated
with a 455 nm LED (145 mW cm–2), which induced the
back isomerization from cis to trans (Figure c). This
bending motion was reversible for at least 12 cycles with no apparent
signs of fatigue (Figure S15). Additionally,
no delamination of the LCE from the PEI was observed after the 12
cycles, suggesting good adhesion of the stripe to the passive substrate.
Despite being only 40% covered with the light-responsive LCE, the
film showed a large, light-driven deformation, with a maximum tip
displacement of 25 mm. A similar performance was observed for a film
with the stretching direction of the PEI foil perpendicular to the
printing direction rather than parallel (Figure S15). The observed tip displacement is comparable to the displacement
of a single-layer film made from the same LCE,[44] and to other single- and bilayer films having similar dimensions
with 100% surface area coverage, where maximum light-driven deformations
are ranged from 18 to 26 mm.[5,21,23,43,47] This result suggests that large deformation can be obtained without
fully covering the passive layer with an active material, inspiring
new designs of actuators to unlock their full potential.
Influence of
Thickness, Shape, and Coverage on the Photoactuation
There
are three tunable parameters in the patterned actuator: the
thickness of the active LCE (tLC), fractional
coverage of the passive PEI, and aspect ratio of the film. The effect
of each variable on the maximum tip displacement was systematically
studied, see Tables S3–S5.The influence of the thickness of the active LCE pattern, tLC, on photoactuation was investigated in a
series of films in which the dimensions (5 × 25 mm2) and fractional coverage (40%) of the passive PEI layer were kept
constant (Figure S16 and Table S3). Upon
increasing tLC from 50 μm to 150
μm, the maximum tip displacement recorded after 10 min of illumination
with 365 nm light increased consistently until it reached a maximum
value at a thickness of 95 μm, at which point it decreased.
Preliminary simulations are consistent with this experimental data
(Figure S17) and reveal the importance
of the illumination conditions. When the active layer is illuminated,
two regions are formed through the depth of the LCE: (1) an exposed
region at the surface that expands along the longitudinal axis and
(2) the nonexposed, deeper region that remains inert. The extent of
the expanding region depends on several factors (including illumination
time, light intensity, and azobenzene concentration). In thin LCE
layers, the entire depth of the LCE stripe is exposed to the light,
causing for its entirety to expand. A further increase of tLC results in unexposed regions within the LCE
that increase the effective bending stiffness of the actuator, reducing
the maximum tip displacement, which is inversely correlated to the
passive layer thickness cubed (t3).[43] The resulting optimal thickness value for the
LCE for maximum tip displacement is, thus, determined by our specific
illumination conditions.We investigated the effect of varying
fractional coverage in the
photoactuation in a series of films with identical dimensions (5 ×
25 mm2) and deposited LCE thicknesses (90 μm) (Figure a and Table S4). By increasing coverage from 0 to 100%,
the maximum tip displacement plateaued at ca. 40%
coverage. The comparative rate of actuation during the initial 5 s
of light exposure was roughly linear until 40% coverage where it peaks
and roughly plateauing at greater coverages. Preliminary simulations
were generally consistent with the experimental data and help in understanding
the observed tendencies (Figure S17). It
appears that a minimum coverage is required to initiate rapid, extensive
actuation: the degree of coverage required will be affected by the
relative physical characteristics of the passive and active layers
and the illumination conditions. When increasing the fractional coverage
of the LCE, the width of the stripe increases, resulting in increasingly
significant perpendicular contraction and the generation of orthogonal
stresses that oppose tip displacement, contributing to the plateau
formation for displacement and decay in the absolute velocity. The
orthogonal stresses that oppose tip displacement arise from the illuminated
region as it expands parallel to the alignment (ca. 4%),[44] but it also contracts perpendicular
to it (ca. 2%, see Supporting Informtation for the calculations). Thus, the ca. 40% covered soft actuator outperforms 100% covered actuators with
respect to speed, while the maximum tip displacement is about the
same; this is an important finding to consider in future designs of
patterned actuators, as it suggests less material is actually better.
Figure 4
Maximum
tip displacement and average velocity after 5 s of illumination
as a function of (a) fractional LCE coverage and (b) PEI aspect ratio
of the films with 40% LCE coverage, respectively. In both cases the
illumination time with a 365 nm (80 mW cm–2) LED
was 10 min. Above the plots, schematics represent some of the films
used for the studies. Yellow indicates the LCE and light gray represents
the PEI. In Tables S4 and S5 from the Supporting Informtation the reader can find the different dimensions,
thickness, and prebends of the films used for this optimization study.
Maximum
tip displacement and average velocity after 5 s of illumination
as a function of (a) fractional LCE coverage and (b) PEI aspect ratio
of the films with 40% LCE coverage, respectively. In both cases the
illumination time with a 365 nm (80 mW cm–2) LED
was 10 min. Above the plots, schematics represent some of the films
used for the studies. Yellow indicates the LCE and light gray represents
the PEI. In Tables S4 and S5 from the Supporting Informtation the reader can find the different dimensions,
thickness, and prebends of the films used for this optimization study.Finally, the effect of the patterned actuator aspect
ratio on photoactuation
was evaluated. The widths (w) of the films were increased
while maintaining 25 mm length, fractional coverage (40%), and thickness
(90 μm) (Figure b and Table S5). By increasing the aspect
ratio from 1.3 to 5, the maximum tip displacement and the average
speed for the first 5 s of illumination increased linearly. When increasing
the aspect ratio, the width of the LCE layer (wLCE) is proportionally reduced. As a result, the ca. 2% contraction that occurs along wLCE that induces the bending opposing the tip displacement is minimized,
but the expansion (ca. 4%) along the longitudinal
axis responsible for the bending is maintained, as the length is not
altered. Thus, increasing the aspect ratio results in larger and faster
actuations as the forces opposing bending are reduced.
Patterned Actuators
with Various Shape-Morphing Capabilities
To fully explore
the potential of patterning, a 20 × 25 mm2 film topped
by two 4 × 25 mm2 stripes of
the LCE separated by 4 mm was fabricated (Figure a and Movie S2). The film has 40% of the PEI foil covered by the LCE and an aspect
ratio of 1.3. Each of the two active layers can be individually triggered
thanks to the space between them. Triggering one or the other of the
LCE stripes by continual exposure up and down the stripe results in
a twisting motion either counter-clockwise or clockwise, depending
on which stripe is activated. Thus, by the simple printing of two
stripes, additional motions can be induced in the film, also predicted
by simulation (Figure S18). Interestingly,
when both stripes are irradiated simultaneously, the film bends, with
the bend significantly greater than for a film having an identical
net aspect ratio and total coverage fraction (40%), but with the active
region concentrated as a single stripe in the center (Figure S19 and Movies S3 and S4). Such performance enhancements
suggest that the active layer’s distribution should also be
considered when designing patterned actuators. We hypothesize that
this increased amplitude response is the result of reducing the aspect
ratio of the active layer, minimizing the counteracting forces from
the perpendicular expansion of the LCE stripe.
Figure 5
Underwater performance
of an actuator presenting multiple shape
changes. (a) On the left, a schematic drawing of the actuator: yellow
indicates the LCE and light gray represents the PEI. The thickness
of the LCE was found to be 90 μm. On the right, edge-on photographs
of the actuator showing the different deformations accomplished when
illuminated, partially or completely, with a 365 nm (80 mW cm–2) LED. The insets show which region of the actuator
is illuminated in each case; the active part has been patterned with
purple lines and colored in orange. (b) Series of images showing the
deformations that the actuator from (a) undergoes when no constraints
are applied and light (from the top) and temperature are used to trigger
different stresses and induce phase changes in the active layer that
result in bending in opposite directions. Detailed snapshots of the
shape changes from 19 to 50 °C can be found in Figure S20. For both (a,b), snapshots of the simulated actuation
can be seen in Figure S18.
Underwater performance
of an actuator presenting multiple shape
changes. (a) On the left, a schematic drawing of the actuator: yellow
indicates the LCE and light gray represents the PEI. The thickness
of the LCE was found to be 90 μm. On the right, edge-on photographs
of the actuator showing the different deformations accomplished when
illuminated, partially or completely, with a 365 nm (80 mW cm–2) LED. The insets show which region of the actuator
is illuminated in each case; the active part has been patterned with
purple lines and colored in orange. (b) Series of images showing the
deformations that the actuator from (a) undergoes when no constraints
are applied and light (from the top) and temperature are used to trigger
different stresses and induce phase changes in the active layer that
result in bending in opposite directions. Detailed snapshots of the
shape changes from 19 to 50 °C can be found in Figure S20. For both (a,b), snapshots of the simulated actuation
can be seen in Figure S18.The light response of the LCE used here has a unique temperature
sensitivity which controls the directionality of the light-driven
bending motion,[44] as demonstrated when
actuating the films in air at different light intensities (Figures S13 and S14). Basically, when the network
is illuminated in the SmC mesophase, it bends away from the light,
while when illuminated in the N mesophase, it bends toward the light
source. We thus explored this property of the LCE to induce additional
shape changes in patterned actuators (2 × 25 mm2,
40% coverage, and 90 μm of LCE, Figure a) by combining light and temperature (Figure b). Rather than being
suspended, the film was left at 19 °C underwater, lying on the
floor of the container with the LCE side facing upward. Upon light
illumination from the top at 19 °C, the film bent away from the
light source and eventually ended up standing. The light was switched
off, and the temperature gradually increased from 19 to 28 °C
(Figure S20). Initially, the film started
to unbend toward its initial flat state, which was expected as temperature
induces a phase transition in the polymer network from Sm-to-N, resulting
in a gradual contraction of the illuminated LCE[44] parallel to an opposing anisotropic shape change induced
by temperature in the unexposed region of the network (Figure S8).[44] However,
from 30 to 50 °C, the film started to bend perpendicular to the
longitudinal axis, increasing its curvature with temperature. Illumination
with blue light had no effect on this deformation. Sudden removal
from the water and placement on a 20 °C surface resulted in recovery
of its initial bent state along the longitudinal axis. Placed again
in water at 50 °C, the film immediately switched its bending
to opposite of the longitudinal axis instead of along it. Such orthogonal
bending motion induced by a combination of light and temperature was
also predicted by the simulations which supports the proposed mechanism
behind this atypical shape change (Figure S18). This atypical perpendicular bending is the result of the temperature-induced
LCE expansion occurring opposite to the alignment direction (Figure S8), when the LCE layer is spread as two
stripes, as opposed to having it concentrated in a single stripe as
in Figure , which
results in such a unique motion. Thus, two stripes plus a combination
of light and temperature led to a film that reversibly switches from
flat to bent along the longitudinal axis to bending opposite to it,
making this the first actuator showing such shape-morphing capability.We also fabricated larger patterned actuators with alternative
deformations modes. A 25 × 36 mm2, 33% covered, and
90 μm LCE film with four separate LCE stripes (one pair of 4
× 25 mm and one pair of 2 × 25 mm) could be sequentially
twisted by gradually activating the stripes one by one, from bottom
to top (Figure S21 and Movie S5). Another 20 × 25 mm2, 16% covered,
and 90 μm LCE film with two asymmetrical LCE lines (one stripe
of 1.7 × 25 mm and one of 1.5 × 25 mm) resulted in different
degrees of twist (Figure S22 and Movie S6). These examples embody the benefits
of distributing the active material in discrete (symmetrical or asymmetrical)
regions over the passive layer surface as it allows distinct, controlled,
and reversible deformations modes.
Light-Responsive Photonic
Actuator
The dual-stripe
actuator presented in the previous section (20 × 25 mm2, 40% coverage, and 90 μm of LCE, Figure a) left a significant fraction of the PEI
foil uncovered. This construction allows for deposition of an additional
functional ink in the blank regions. We opted to print a single 3
× 24 mm2 stripe cholesteric LC (CLC) ink, a photonic
polymer network with a helical arrangement of LC molecules,[48] between the previously deposited light-responsive
LCE stripes (Figure a). Optical and structural characterization of the 100 μm thick
reflective CLC layer shows a broad reflection band centered at 564
nm (Figure b,c). The
edges of the layer are less defined than those observed in Figure c, as the CLC ink
has a lower viscosity than the LC ink, so after extrusion it shows
increased spreading before polymerization. The difference in viscosity
between the inks also explains the dewetting observed at the extremes
of the reflective stripe. The film still displays large bending deformations
triggered by light despite the addition of the extra CLC layer (Figure S22). The potential use as a dynamic reflector
was investigated (Figure d). The light-responsive-actuating reflector was suspended
underwater and the CLC stripe exposed to light from green (λ
= 532 nm) or red (λ = 633 nm) lasers. At rest, red light was
transmitted while green light was partially reflected by the film,
as expected (Figure b). 365 nm light was then used to trigger the responsive LCE in the
stripes, causing film bending. As a result, the central reflective
region was removed from the path of both lasers, permitting a light
controlled on-and-off transmission of the green laser light through
the water. This patterned actuator, having two stripes of a light-responsive
material and one of a photonic elastomer, shows the benefit of patterning
different materials to obtain multiple functionalities while having
numerous shape-morphing capabilities in the same film.
Figure 6
Light-responsive photonic
actuator. (a) Front photograph of the
light-responsive photonic actuator. The inset shows the molecular
alignment of the CLCE line, which consist of a helix structure. Thanks
to the periodicity of the full rotation of the helix, around 376 nm,
the middle line acts as the reflector for green light. (b) Fraction
of reflected light as a function of the incident wavelength on the
CLCE. (c) 3D profile of the edge of the CLCE and the PEI. (d) Series
of edge-on photographs in which the selectivity to reflect a specific
wavelength of the actuator and light-driven deformation are shown.
The images show the actuator underwater. The 365 nm (80 mW cm–2), 455 nm (145 mW cm–2), and laser
lights were all incident from the left.
Light-responsive photonic
actuator. (a) Front photograph of the
light-responsive photonic actuator. The inset shows the molecular
alignment of the CLCE line, which consist of a helix structure. Thanks
to the periodicity of the full rotation of the helix, around 376 nm,
the middle line acts as the reflector for green light. (b) Fraction
of reflected light as a function of the incident wavelength on the
CLCE. (c) 3D profile of the edge of the CLCE and the PEI. (d) Series
of edge-on photographs in which the selectivity to reflect a specific
wavelength of the actuator and light-driven deformation are shown.
The images show the actuator underwater. The 365 nm (80 mW cm–2), 455 nm (145 mW cm–2), and laser
lights were all incident from the left.
Conclusions
We have demonstrated that using DIW to fabricate
LC-based patterned
films leads to actuators providing alternative, controlled shape deformations
with additional functionalities possible. The systematic study performed
in this work revealed that passive substrates, such as thermoplastics,
can be made responsive without fully covering the surface with active
material or affecting their performance, which reduces the fabrication
cost as less of the expensive LC material is needed. Additionally,
patterning offers the possibility of having discrete active regions
of the foils that can be individually triggered and create localized
stresses, similar to how tendons control motion in human hands. As
a result, we could achieve reversible, light-driven twisting, both
right- and left-handed, and bending, parallel and perpendicular to
one of the axes, in the same film. Additionally, partially covering
the passive layer also allows a facile combination of different materials
that have distinct functionalities. This was demonstrated by fabricating
a photonic light-responsive actuator that could selectively reflect
a specific wavelength on demand. The results discussed in this contribution
embody the potential of using DIW in fabricating a new class of patterned
actuators with expanded functionality and shape deformation capabilities.
Now the mechanism behind the response of the present system is mostly
understood, future research should make use of simulation to predict
optimal patterns of an active material for fabricating soft actuators
with novel functionalities, responsivities, and complex shape-morphing
capabilities.
Experimental Section
Materials
1,4-Bis-[4-(6-acryloyloxyhexyloxy) benzoyloxy]-2-methylbenzene
(1) was obtained from Merck. 4,4′-Bis(6-acryloyloxyhexyloxy)
azobenzene (2) was acquired from Synthon. 2,2′-(Ethylenedioxy)diethanethiol
(3) and 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The photoinitiator bis(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)-phenylphosphineoxide
(4) was obtained from Ciba. The chiral dopant, (3R,3aR,6S,6aR)-hexahydrofuro[3,2-b]furan-3,6-diyl bis(4-((4-(((4-(acryloyloxy)butoxy)carbonyl)oxy)benzoyl)oxy)benzoate)
(5) used to prepared the CLC ink was purchased from BASF
SE, see Figure S23 for the molecular structure.
1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (6, DBU) and dimethylphenylphosphine
(7, Me2PPh) were acquired from TCl Chemicals Europe N.V.
Dichloromethane (DCM) was obtained from Biosolve. PEI foil (Ultem
UTF 120) of 10 ± 2 μm thickness was supplied by SABIC.
Characterization
The number-average molecular weight, Mn, of the oligomers and their number-average
repeating units value were obtained from 1H NMR spectra
performed using a 400 MHz Bruker ADVANCE III HD spectrometer with
deuterated chloroform as the solvent. A Shimadzu LC-2030.3D with 254
nm PDA and refractive index detectors was utilized to perform GPC
to measure the weight average molecular weight (Mw) and dispersity, Đ, using polystyrene
(PS) with an average Mw of 350,000 g mol–1 as the reference. The location of the (meso)phase
and glass transitions were determined from DSC traces obtained using
a TA Instruments DSC Q2000 at a cooling and heating rates of 10 °C
min–1. The mechanical properties of freestanding
PEI and LC films were measured using a TA Instruments Q800 dynamic
mechanical analyzer (DMA). Storage moduli as a function of temperature
(5 °C min–1 ramp) were measured at a frequency f = 1 Hz with an amplitude set to 20 μm. Expansion
coefficients were determined in controlled force (10 mN) experiments
in which the reversible changes in length were monitored as a function
of temperature (5 °C min–1 ramp). Optical micrographs
were recorded with a Leica DM 2700M polarized optical microscope equipped
using a Leica MC170 HD camera. All structures were visualised in a
bright field transmission mode. An optical profiling system (Sensofar
S neox 3D Optical profiler, equipped with a 5× objective) was
employed to record 3D profiles of the edges of the printed polymers
to measure their thicknesses. UV–vis spectra were recorded
using a PerkinElmer Lambda 750 spectrometer equipped with a 150 mm
integrating sphere and a tungsten halogen light source for measurements
between 320 and 850 nm light wavelengths. The samples were placed
before the inlet of the integrating sphere for transmission and absorption
measurement and at the back of the sphere for reflection measurements.
Preparation of the LC Ink
The LC oligomer was prepared
as previously reported.[44] The synthesis
is based on a catalyzed thiol–acrylate Michael addition reaction
of diacrylate mesogen 1 and diacrylate azobenzene 2 using as a spacer 3. The acrylate-to-thiol
ratio was set to 1.0:0.9 to obtain acrylate-terminated oligomers.
The final concentration of azobenzene 2 was 7 wt %. In
short, first 1–3 are dissolved in DCM. Under constant
agitation, a few drops of DBU (6) are added to the solution.
The solution was left to react for at least 2 h and the oligomer was
then washed with 1 M HCl (2×) and saturated brine (1×) to
remove the existing DBU. The organic phase was collected and dried
with MgSO4 and the residual solvent was removed in a vacuum
oven at 90 °C overnight. The characterization of the prepared
LC oligomer can be found in Figures S1 and S2 and Tables S2 and S3. The LC ink was prepared by mixing the
LC oligomer (98 wt %) with the photoinitiator (2 wt % 4) in DCM. After complete dissolution of the components, the LC ink
was obtained by removing the solvent by casting the solution in a
Teflon Petri dish and leaving it at room temperature under vacuum
overnight.
Preparation of the CLC Ink
The photonic
CLC ink was
prepared as previously described.[48] In
short, the CLC ink was prepared via a nucleophile catalyzed thiol–acrylate
Michael addition. Here, the molar ratio of diacrylate-to-dithiol was
3:2. The final concentration of chiral dopant was 5.7 wt % 5 (Figure S23). After dissolving all components
in DCM at room temperature, catalyst 7 was added and
the reaction was left under strong stirring for 1 h. The CLC ink was
prepared by mixing the CLC oligomer (98 wt %) with the photoinitiator
(2 wt % 4) in DCM. The solvent was removed at room temperature
overnight under vacuum.
Direct Ink Writing
Controlled depositions
of the inks
on the 10 μm thick PEI foil was performed using a commercial
3D printer (EHR, Hyrel 3D). The inks were loaded at room temperature
into a stainless steel reservoir with a 335 μm nozzle diameter
(27 ga A.W.G, Fisnar QuantX Micron-S Red). Uniaxial alignment for
the LC ink was obtained by printing at a speed of 7 mm s–1 with the syringe at 70 °C and the bed at room temperature.
To obtain cholesteric lines from the CLC ink, the optimal printing
conditions were found by printing at 2 mm s–1 with
the syringe at 90 °C and the bed at 53 °C, as previously
reported.[48] The LC ink requires high printing
speeds to induce uniaxial alignment while the CLC ink needs low speeds
and elevated temperature of the bed to facilitate the self-organization
of the cholesteric alignment.[44,48] The G-code that controlled
the printing path was generated using printer software. After printing,
photopolymerization was induced under inert conditions (N2) using an Excelitas EXFO Omnicure S2000 light source in which 57%
of the light output has a wavelength of 395–445 nm and 43%,
of 320–390 nm. For samples containing azobenzene (2), an optical high-pass filter (>405 nm) was employed to avoid
undesired
isomerization. Exposure took place over 2 h, the films being flipped
every 30 min to circumvent a gradient forming in the cross-link density
through the printed stripes thickness.[44] Polymerization for the CLC stripe took place in 30 min. The difference
in the polymerization time of the two inks arises from the different
viscosities (effecting the mobility of free-radicals), cross-link
densities (effecting the probability for cross-links to form), and
filter use (lowering the maximum light intensity available throughout
the material). After fabrication, the optical properties, thicknesses,
and alignments of the printed stripes were characterized using UV–vis
spectroscopy, a 3D profiling system, and an optical microscope, respectively.
Gel Fraction
The fraction of cross-linking of the LCE
network is defined as the gel fraction. To measure, a film was immersed
in DCM for 24 h at room temperature. The sample was filtered and dried
at 60 °C in a vacuum oven. The fraction of gel in the network
was determined using eq , in which minitial is the mass of the
film before immersion in DCM and mdry is
the mass of the film after filtration and subsequent drying.
Laser Cutting
Cuts of the PEI foil and on the LCE were
performed using a laser cutter (Universal Laser Systems VLS 3.50,
VersaLASER). The cutter is equipped with a CO2 laser beam
with a power of up to 40 W. The actual intensity encountered by the
sample depends on the scanning speed (set at 80%), dots per inch (set
to 500), the focus (0.1 mm above the sample holder), material absorbance,
and the cleanness of the equipment. As a result, the laser power is
difficult to reproduce from day-to-day, and so before every cutting
session the optimal laser power was determined. All samples in which
actuations were compared were cut the same day. The cutting path used
to slice the samples was defined using AutoCAD software (Autodesk).
The high temperatures created during cutting appear to induce a prebend
in the samples, even in bare PEI foil samples, see Figures S6 and S7.
Underwater Photoactuation of the Actuators
The films,
either suspended or laying on the floor of the container, were located
inside a transparent container with flat sides filled with water.
UV light (365 nm, Thorlabs M365L2) and blue light (455 nm, Thorlabs
M455L3-C2) were used to switch between the two isomerization states
of the azobenzene groups. For further details on the setup see Figure
S11 from the Supporting Information. The
light intensity was adjusted using a Thorlabs DC4104 controller. Before
beginning the actual study, the samples were actuated for at least
a couple of cycles to verify the reversibility and reproducibility
of their shape changes and then illuminated with 455 nm light for
at least 10 min to ensure all azobenzene groups were in the trans
isomer. The light driven motion was recorded using a camera (Olympus
OM-D E-M10 Mk III). The temperature of water was controlled with a
digital thermometer: unless specified, its temperature was 19 °C.
The tip displacement of the patterned actuators was analyzed using
ImageJ software.[49] When investigating the
selectivity of the printed CLCE to reflect certain wavelengths, green
(λ = 532 nm, <1 mW, BASETech) and red (λ = 633 nm,
<4 mW, JDS Uniphase) lasers were employed.
Simulations
The
temporal light-actuated coupled photomechanical
response of the LCE/PEI bilayer actuators is simulated using an implicit
dynamic solution procedure in commercial finite element software,
ABAQUS.[50] The two regions of LCE/PEI and
PEI alone are created using partitions. The LCE/PEI region is modeled
as a bilayer composite shell, whereas the PEI region is modeled as
a homogenous shell. A total of 399 points are taken through the thickness
to depict the through-thickness variation of cis mass
fraction. The film is discretized using 4-node shell elements with
reduced integration (S4R) with a mesh size of 0.2 mm for all the simulations.
The different attenuation depths of trans and cis isomers and the corresponding influence on the attenuation
of light through the thickness are considered to estimate the temporal
evolution of the cis mass fraction through the thickness of the LCE
accurately. The readers may refer to our earlier works[51,52] for details on the photo-isomerization model. The photo-isomerization
parameters,[51] namely, forward reaction
coefficient (α), backward reaction coefficient (β), trans attenuation depth (dt), cis attenuation depth (dc), and thermal relaxation time constant (τ) are taken
as reported in Table S6. The values of dt and dc are estimated
from the absorption characteristics of the trans and cis isomers shown in Figure S3g. In the model, the influence of varying the angle between the light
propagation direction and the director orientation (ϕ) on the
isomerization kinetics as the film bends is considered by changing
the polarization coefficient, ζ = (1/3)(1 – SP2(cosϕ)) (where P2(x) = (3x2 – 1)/2), accordingly.
The shadowing of some areas of the film as the film bends is also
considered in the model. The elastic properties of the LCE and PEI
are taken as mentioned in Table S6. Note
that the elastic modulus of the LCE, PEI, and the photo-isomerization
parameters (α, β, and τ) strongly influence the
temporal response and the magnitude of the tip displacement. The photo-expansion
coefficients for the LCE in the SmC phase are taken following the
X-ray scattering measurements as discussed in the Supporting Information. The thermal expansion coefficients
are taken from the experimental measurements (see Figure S8). To simulate the combined light- and heat-actuated
response, that is, the influence of phase transition SmC-N, on the
deformation, the photo-expansion coefficients are varied as a function
of temperature linearly between the pure SmC phase (assumed to be
at 19 °C) and pure N phase (assumed to be at 50 °C).
Authors: Arda Kotikian; Connor McMahan; Emily C Davidson; Jalilah M Muhammad; Robert D Weeks; Chiara Daraio; Jennifer A Lewis Journal: Sci Robot Date: 2019-08-21
Authors: María López-Valdeolivas; Danqing Liu; Dick Jan Broer; Carlos Sánchez-Somolinos Journal: Macromol Rapid Commun Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 5.734