| Literature DB >> 34870775 |
Xu Jiang1, Hui Ma2, Qing-Lei Zhao1, Jun Yang1, Cai-Yun Xin1, Bocong Chen1.
Abstract
As an important form of sustainable agriculture, rice-crab (Eriocheir sinensis) co-culture is rapid developing worldwide. However, the knowledge on the bacterial communities of the different components of the system is limited. In this study, we investigated the bacterial community structure in paddy soil and ditch sediment by using high-throughput sequencing technology. The results showed that compared with the ditch sediment, the content of NH4+-N in paddy soil decreased by 62.31%, and the content of AP (available phosphorus) increased by 172.02% (P < 0.05). The most abundant phyla in paddy soil and ditch sediment were Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Chloroflexi, whose relative abundance was above 65%. Among the dominant genera, the relative abundance of an uncultured bacterium genus of Saprospiraceae and an uncultured bacterium genus of Lentimicrobiaceae in paddy soil was significantly lower than ditch sediment (P < 0.05). Alpha diversity indicated that the bacterial diversity of paddy soil and ditch sediment was similar. The bacterial community structure was affected by the relative abundance of bacteria, not the species of bacteria. Redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that the bacterial communities in paddy soil and ditch sediment were correlated with physicochemical properties. Our findings showed that the bacterial community structure was distinct in paddy soil and ditch sediment under rice-crab co-culture probably due to their different management patterns. These results can provide theoretical support for improving rice-crab co-culture technology.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial community; Ditch sediment; Paddy soil; Rice-crab co-culture
Year: 2021 PMID: 34870775 PMCID: PMC8648911 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-021-01323-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Physicochemical properties of paddy soil and ditch sediment
| TN (g kg−1) | TP (g kg−1) | AN (mg kg−1) | AP (mg kg−1) | NH4+-N (mg kg−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 0.81 ± 0.20 | 0.73 ± 0.04 | 62.40 ± 15.55 | 7.29 ± 2.82a | 8.49 ± 1.41a |
| S | 1.25 ± 0.40 | 0.83 ± 0.16 | 82.13 ± 15.62 | 19.83 ± 2.15b | 3.20 ± 0.68b |
B: ditch sediment; S: paddy soil. Values in the same column with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05). The same as below
Fig. 1Rarefaction curve of different samples
Alpha diversity index of paddy soil and ditch sediment
| ACE | Chao1 | Simpson | Shannon | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 1418.89 ± 47.08 | 1432.19 ± 31.84 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 9.16 ± 0.10 |
| S | 1309.48 ± 208.00 | 1292.99 ± 183.70 | 0.99 ± 0.00 | 8.72 ± 0.67 |
Fig. 2Bacterial community heatmap analysis in genus level
Fig. 3The Venn diagram of different samples at OTU level
Fig. 4Percentages of the dominant phyla in paddy soil and ditch sediment
Fig. 5The differences with the significance of the top 6 phyla in paddy soil and ditch sediment
Fig. 6Percentages of the dominant genera in paddy soil and ditch sediment
Fig. 7The differences with the significance of the top 17 genera in paddy soil and ditch sediment (* indicates P < 0.05)
Fig. 8RDA of 6 dominant phyla and environmental factors. Pro: Proteobacteria, Aci: Acidobacteria, Cam: Campilobacterota, Bac: Bacteroidetes, Ver: Verrucomicrobia, Chl: Chloroflexi