Literature DB >> 34870216

Integrating Al Algorithms into the Clinical Workflow.

Krishna Juluru1, Hao-Hsin Shih1, Krishna Nand Keshava Murthy1, Pierre Elnajjar1, Amin El-Rowmeim1, Christopher Roth1, Brad Genereaux1, Josef Fox1, Eliot Siegel1, Daniel L Rubin1.   

Abstract

Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) applications within clinical workflows is an important step for leveraging developed AI algorithms. In this report, generalizable components for deploying AI systems into clinical practice are described that were implemented in a clinical pilot study using lymphoscintigraphy examinations as a prospective use case (July 1, 2019-October 31, 2020). Deployment of the AI algorithm consisted of seven software components, as follows: (a) image delivery, (b) quality control, (c) a results database, (d) results processing, (e) results presentation and delivery, (f) error correction, and (g) a dashboard for performance monitoring. A total of 14 users used the system (faculty radiologists and trainees) to assess the degree of satisfaction with the components and overall workflow. Analyses included the assessment of the number of examinations processed, error rates, and corrections. The AI system processed 1748 lymphoscintigraphy examinations. The system enabled radiologists to correct 146 AI results, generating real-time corrections to the radiology report. All AI results and corrections were successfully stored in a database for downstream use by the various integration components. A dashboard allowed monitoring of the AI system performance in real time. All 14 survey respondents "somewhat agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the AI system was well integrated into the clinical workflow. In all, a framework of processes and components for integrating AI algorithms into clinical workflows was developed. The implementation described could be helpful for assessing and monitoring AI performance in clinical practice. Keywords: PACS, Computer Applications-General (Informatics), Diagnosis © RSNA, 2021. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer Applications-General (Informatics); Diagnosis; PACS

Year:  2021        PMID: 34870216      PMCID: PMC8637237          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021210013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  12 in total

1.  A user-centered model for web site design: needs assessment, user interface design, and rapid prototyping.

Authors:  Mable B Kinzie; Wendy F Cohn; Marti F Julian; William A Knaus
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Implementation of a Point-of-Care Radiologist-Technologist Communication Tool in a Quality Assurance Program.

Authors:  Leonard Ong; Pierre Elnajjar; C Gregory Nyman; Thomas Mair; Krishna Juluru
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Current Applications and Future Impact of Machine Learning in Radiology.

Authors:  Garry Choy; Omid Khalilzadeh; Mark Michalski; Synho Do; Anthony E Samir; Oleg S Pianykh; J Raymond Geis; Pari V Pandharipande; James A Brink; Keith J Dreyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer.

Authors:  J J Albertini; G H Lyman; C Cox; T Yeatman; L Balducci; N Ku; S Shivers; C Berman; K Wells; D Rapaport; A Shons; J Horton; H Greenberg; S Nicosia; R Clark; A Cantor; D S Reintgen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The State of Radiology AI: Considerations for Purchase Decisions and Current Market Offerings.

Authors:  Yasasvi Tadavarthi; Brianna Vey; Elizabeth Krupinski; Adam Prater; Judy Gichoya; Nabile Safdar; Hari Trivedi
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-11-11

6.  Interactive Visualization of Healthcare Data Using Tableau.

Authors:  Inseok Ko; Hyejung Chang
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2017-10-31

7.  The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study.

Authors:  Johanna O P Wanders; Katharina Holland; Nico Karssemeijer; Petra H M Peeters; Wouter B Veldhuis; Ritse M Mann; Carla H van Gils
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  DICOM structured reporting and cancer clinical trials results.

Authors:  David A Clunie
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-05-12

9.  DICOM for quantitative imaging biomarker development: a standards based approach to sharing clinical data and structured PET/CT analysis results in head and neck cancer research.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; David Clunie; Ethan Ulrich; Christian Bauer; Andreas Wahle; Bartley Brown; Michael Onken; Jörg Riesmeier; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis; John Buatti; Reinhard R Beichel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 10.  Patient-Centered Radiology with FHIR: an Introduction to the Use of FHIR to Offer Radiology a Clinically Integrated Platform.

Authors:  Peter I Kamel; Paul G Nagy
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Cases for and against Artificial Intelligence in the Medical School Curriculum.

Authors:  Brandon Ngo; Diep Nguyen; Eric vanSonnenberg
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-08-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.