| Literature DB >> 34868072 |
Blanca Garcia-Solis1,2,3, Ana Van Den Rym1,2,3, Jareb J Pérez-Caraballo4,5, Abdulwahab Al-Ayoubi6, Anas M Alazami7, Lazaro Lorenzo8, Carolina Cubillos-Zapata2,9, Eduardo López-Collazo2, Antonio Pérez-Martínez10,11, Luis M Allende12, Janet Markle5,4, Miguel Fernández-Arquero3,13, Silvia Sánchez-Ramón3,13, Maria J Recio3,14, Jean-Laurent Casanova8,15,16,17, Reem Mohammed18,19, Rubén Martinez-Barricarte4,5, Rebeca Pérez de Diego1,2,3.
Abstract
The CARD-BCL10-MALT1 (CBM) complex is critical for the proper assembly of human immune responses. The clinical and immunological consequences of deficiencies in some of its components such as CARD9, CARD11, and MALT1 have been elucidated in detail. However, the scarcity of BCL10 deficient patients has prevented gaining detailed knowledge about this genetic disease. Only two patients with BCL10 deficiency have been reported to date. Here we provide an in-depth description of an additional patient with autosomal recessive complete BCL10 deficiency caused by a nonsense mutation that leads to a loss of expression (K63X). Using mass cytometry coupled with unsupervised clustering and machine learning computational methods, we obtained a thorough characterization of the consequences of BCL10 deficiency in different populations of leukocytes. We showed that in addition to the near absence of memory B and T cells previously reported, this patient displays a reduction in NK, γδT, Tregs, and TFH cells. The patient had recurrent respiratory infections since early childhood, and showed a family history of lethal severe infectious diseases. Fortunately, hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) cured her. Overall, this report highlights the importance of early genetic diagnosis for the management of BCL10 deficient patients and HSCT as the recommended treatment to cure this disease.Entities:
Keywords: BCL10; CBM complex; autosomal recessive; combined immunodeficiency; computational immunology; mass cytometry; next-generation sequencing; primary immunodeficiency
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34868072 PMCID: PMC8633570 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.786572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 1BCL10 deficiency in a patient with CID. (A) Familial segregation of the mutation K63X in BCL10. (B) Sanger sequencing results of P3 and her family members in the region spanning the BCL10 mutation. The amino acid consequence is indicated above the graphs. (C) Immunoblot analysis of BCL10 protein in PBMC of the patient (P3), parents (I1, I2), siblings (II1, II2, II3), and healthy control (C). GAPDH was used as a loading control. The panels illustrate the results from a single experiment, representative of three.
Figure 2Leukocyte immunophenotyping. (A) Dimensional reduction by t-SNE of the 33 markers used for immunophenotyping by mass cytometry. Each color represents a cell population obtained by manual clustering according to their surface marker expression. 50,000 cells from healthy controls (HC), heterozygous carriers (Het), and the patient are represented. (B) Density t-SNE showing the distribution of leukocytes in healthy control (HC), heterozygous carrier (Het), and the patient. (C) Median expression heatmap of the markers shown under the graph, for the populations shown in (A, D) Frequencies of the populations highlighted in (A) as a percentage of leukocytes. (E) Frequencies of MAIT, γδ T, and natural killer cells in healthy controls (HC), heterozygote carrier (Het), and patient as a percentage of leukocytes obtained by manual gating in FlowJo shown in .
Figure 3B cells immunophenotyping. (A) UMAP representation showing the B cell population from . Each color represents a cluster obtained by unsupervised clustering using flowSOM. 10,000 cells from healthy controls (HC), heterozygous carriers (Het), and the patient are represented. (B) Frequencies of the flowSOM clusters highlighted in (A) as a percentage of total cells in the B cell population from. (C) MEM heatmap and marker tags for the clusters shown in (A). In bold are highlighted the markers differentially expressed between clusters. (D) CD27 vs. IgD B cell manual gating example for a healthy representative control (HC) and the patient. Detailed gating strategy is shown in . (E) Frequencies of Naïve, Double Negative, switched and unswitched B cells in healthy controls (HC), heterozygote carrier (Het) and patient as a percentage of leukocytes obtained by manual gating in FlowJo.
Figure 4CD4+ T cells immunophenotyping. (A) UMAP representation showing the CD4+ T population from . Each color represents a cluster obtained by unsupervised clustering using flowSOM. 10,000 cells from healthy controls (HC), heterozygous carriers (Het), and the patient are represented. (B) Frequencies of the flowSOM clusters highlighted in (A) as a percentage of total cells in the CD4+ T cell cluster from . (C) MEM heatmap and marker tags for the clusters shown in (A). In bold are highlighted the markers differentially expressed between clusters. (D) CD45RA vs. CCR7 CD4+ T cell gating example for a representative healthy control (HC) and the patient. Detailed gating strategy is shown in . (E) Frequencies of Naïve, TEMRA, effector memory (EM) and central memory (CM) CD4+ T cells in healthy controls (HC), heterozygous carrier (Het), and patient as a percentage of leukocytes obtained by manual gating in FlowJo.
Figure 5CD8+ T cells immunophenotyping. (A) UMAP representation showing the CD8+ T population from . Each color represents a cluster obtained by unsupervised clustering using flowSOM. 10,000 cells from healthy controls (HC), heterozygous carriers (Het) and the patient are represented. (B) Frequencies of the flowSOM clusters highlighted in (A) as a percentage of total cells in the CD8+ T cells cluster from . (C) MEM heatmap and marker tags for the clusters shown in (A). In bold are highlighted the markers differentially expressed between clusters. (D) CD45RA vs. CCR7 CD8+ cell gating example for a representative healthy control (HC) and the patient. Detailed gating strategy is shown in . (E) Frequencies of Naïve, TEMRA, effector memory (EM) and central memory (CM) CD8+ T cells in healthy controls (HC), heterozygous carrier (Het), and patient as a percentage of leukocytes obtained by manual gating in FlowJo.
Summary of the main genetic, clinical, immunological, and cellular features comparing the three BCL10-deficient patients reported.
| P1 | P2 | P3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| g.85741978C > T; IVS1+1G>A | g.85270702G>A, c.262C>T, p.R88X | g. 85270779A>T, c.187A>T, p.K63X |
|
| Homozygosis, consanguineous parents | Homozygosis, consanguineous parents | Homozygosis, consanguineous parents |
|
| No | No | No |
|
| 6mo: Gastroenteritis, otitis, and respiratory infections. | 1mo: Flare of the BCG scar with increased erythema and swelling. | 1yo: Hospitalized due to pneumonia (bacterial). |
|
| B cells: | B cells: | B cells: |
| T cells: | T cells: | T cells: | |
Keys Suspicion: Clinical history of respiratory infections since the first months of age. No memory lymphocytes (or reduced levels) despite normal total cell numbers, hypogammaglobulinemia. Confirmation: BCL10 sequencing and by measurement of BCL10 protein expression Treatment: HSCT.