| Literature DB >> 34866948 |
Ni Zeng1,2, Yueyue Li2, Qian Wang3, Yihe Chen2, Yan Zhang1, Lanfang Zhang1, Feng Jiang4,5, Wei Yuan1, Dan Luo2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify potential risk factors for herpes zoster infection in type 2 diabetes mellitus in southeast Chinese population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We built a model involving 266 herpes zoster patients collecting data from January 2018 to December 2019. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) predictive model was used to test herpes zoster virus risk using the patient data. Multivariate regression was conducted to decide which variable would be the strongest to decrease the Lasso penalty. The predictive model was tested using the C-index, a calibration plot, and decision curve study. External validity was verified by bootstrapping by counting probabilities.Entities:
Keywords: glycemic status; herpes zoster; infection; nomogram; type 2 diabetes mellitus
Year: 2021 PMID: 34866948 PMCID: PMC8636977 DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S310938
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Risk Manag Healthc Policy ISSN: 1179-1594
Differences Between Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of T2DM and Non-T2DM Groups
| Demographic Characteristics | Diabetes (166) | Non Diabetes (100) | Total (266) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||
| <50 | 18(43.90) | 23(56.10) | 41(15.41) |
| 50–70 | 97(64.67) | 53(35.33) | 150(56.39) |
| >70 | 51(68.00) | 24(32.00) | 75(28.20) |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 85(65.38) | 45(34.62) | 130(48.87) |
| Female | 81(59.56) | 55(40.44) | 136(51.13) |
| Weight | |||
| ≤60kg | 70(54.69) | 58(45.31) | 128(48.12) |
| >60kg | 96(69.57) | 42(30.43) | 138(51.88) |
| Clinical characteristics | |||
| FPG | |||
| <7.0mmol/L | 57(38.26) | 92(61.74) | 149(56.02) |
| ≥7.0mmol/L | 109(93.16) | 8(6.84) | 117(43.98) |
| 2hPG | |||
| <11.1mmol/L | 91(48.40) | 97(51.60) | 188(70.68) |
| ≥11.1mmol/L | 75(96.15) | 3(3.85) | 78(29.32) |
| Creatinine | |||
| Normal | 148(60.66) | 96(39.34) | 242(91.73) |
| Abnormal | 18(81.82) | 4(18.18) | 22(8.27) |
| Urine protein | |||
| No | 161(62.64) | 96(36.96) | 257(96.62) |
| Yes | 5(55.56) | 4(44.44) | 9(3.38) |
| Glycosuria | |||
| No | 106(52.74) | 95(47.26) | 201(75.56) |
| Yes | 60(92.31) | 5(7.69) | 65(24.44) |
| Side of skin rash | |||
| Left | 89(63.57) | 51(36.43) | 140(52.63) |
| Right | 77(61.11) | 49(38.89) | 126(47.37) |
| Location of skin rash | |||
| Head | 32(54.24) | 27(45.76) | 59(22.18) |
| Neck | 9 (64.29) | 5(35.71) | 14(5.26) |
| Check | 55(66.27) | 28(33.73) | 83(31.20) |
| Twist | 40(59.70) | 27(40.30) | 67(25.19) |
| Other | 30(69.77) | 13(30.23) | 43(16.17) |
| Infection | |||
| No | 146(63.20) | 85(36.80) | 231(86.84) |
| Yes | 20(57.14) | 15(42.86) | 35(13.16) |
| Hypertension | |||
| No | 129(59.17) | 89(40.83) | 218(81.95) |
| Yes | 37(77.08) | 11(22.92) | 48(18.05) |
Abbreviations: FPG, fasting plasma glucose; 2hPG, 2 hours plasma glucose.
Figure 1Using the LASSO model of logistic regression to determine the connection between populations and clinical characteristics.
Prediction Factors for HZ in T2DM Patients
| Intercept and Variable | β | Prediction Model | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Odds Ratio (95% CI) | |||
| Intercept | −2.1497 | 0.5730 | 0.0002 |
| Age | |||
| <50 | Reference | ||
| 50–70 | 0.6768 | 0.4620 | 0.1430 |
| >70 | 0.7042 | 0.5394 | 0.1917 |
| Weight | |||
| <60kg | Reference | ||
| >60kg | 0.5798 | 0.3301 | 0.0726 |
| Length of hospital stay | |||
| <7days | Reference | ||
| >7days | 0.5927 | 0.3293 | 0.6010 |
| 2hPG | |||
| ≤11.1mmol/L | Reference | ||
| >11.1mmol/L | 3.3140 | 0.6438 | <0.0001 |
| Creatinine | |||
| Normal | Reference | ||
| Abnormal | 0.6460 | 0.6344 | 0.3085 |
| Location of skin rash | |||
| Head | Reference | ||
| Neck | −0.3785 | 0.8018 | 0.6368 |
| Check | 0.6711 | 0.4507 | 0.1365 |
| Twist | 0.4401 | 0.4649 | 0.3438 |
| Other | 0.8257 | 0.5517 | 0.1345 |
| Hypertension | |||
| No | Reference | ||
| Yes | 0.7247 | 0.4098 | 0.0770 |
Abbreviation: 2hPG, 2 hours plasma glucose.
Figure 2Development of the HZ nomogram. The chart is made from the data based on gender, age, length of hospital stay, weight, 2 hour PG, creatinine, location of skin rash, and hypertension.
Figure 3The calibration curves of the topic HZ nomogram prediction in the cohort.
Figure 4Decision curve analysis (DCA) for the HZ nomogram.