Literature DB >> 34866900

Lighting Standards Revisited: Introduction of a Mathematical Model for the Assessment of the Impact of Illuminance on Visual Acuity.

Georgios Labiris1, Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou1, Sergios Taliantzis1, Asli Perente1, Konstantinos Delibasis2, Lambros T Doulos3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Primary objective of present study is to introduce a contemporary methodology for the lighting standards update addressing both normophakic and pseudophakic patients.
METHODS: For the sake of our study, we theoretically estimated the intraocular-to-crystalline lens iIluminance ratio (ICIR) and the intraocular lens (IOL) luminous efficiency function VIOL(λ) as a new lighting benefit metric. Then, in a sample of 24 pseudophakic patients (38 eyes) implanted with the trifocal diffractive IOL Panoptix (SG) and in a control group (CG) of 28 normophakic participants (50 eyes), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was measured at illuminance of 550lx (optimal UDVA). Following dark adaptation, illuminance was gradually raised from 20 lx until illuminance level that the patient reached his/her optimal UDVA. This measured illuminance at this point was defined as the minimum required illuminance level (MRIL). MRIL and UDVA for illuminance levels between 20 and 550lx in SG were compared with the corresponding values in CG. MRIL calculation allowed the construction of a predictive mathematical model that estimates the impact of environmental lighting on UDVA.
RESULTS: ICIR for Panoptix eyes ranged from 54.00% to 55.99%. Both groups had significantly higher UDVA at 550lx compared to 20lx (p < 0.05). CG had significantly higher UDVA than SG at 20lx (7.20 letters, p = 0.045), while no significant difference was detected at 550lx (0.40 letters, p = 0.883). SG required significantly more illuminance than CG to maintain their UDVA (MRILSG= 191.05lx, MRILCG= 122lx, p = 0.007). Our predictive model suggests suboptimal UDVA in a series of lighting directives for normophakic and Panoptix eyes.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to introduce the VIOL(λ) as a new lighting benefit metric and a mathematical model that quantifies the impact of illuminance on UDVA in normophakic and pseudophakic patients. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04263636.
© 2021 Labiris et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  illuminance; light transmission; lighting standards; luminous efficiency function; multifocal intraocular lens

Year:  2021        PMID: 34866900      PMCID: PMC8638752          DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S326139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1177-5467


  17 in total

Review 1.  What is light? The visible spectrum and beyond.

Authors:  D H Sliney
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Light, vision, and aging.

Authors:  J S Werner; D H Peterzell; A J Scheetz
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Geographic Variation in the Rate and Timing of Cataract Surgery Among US Communities.

Authors:  Courtney Y Kauh; Taylor S Blachley; Paul R Lichter; Paul P Lee; Joshua D Stein
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 7.389

4.  Spectral transmission of the human crystalline lens in adult and elderly persons: color and total transmission of visible light.

Authors:  Jose M Artigas; Adelina Felipe; Amparo Navea; Adriana Fandiño; Cristina Artigas
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Vision, light and aging: a literature overview on older-age workers.

Authors:  P Nylén; F Favero; S Glimne; K Teär Fahnehjelm; J Eklund
Journal:  Work       Date:  2014-01-01

6.  Patients' Expectations in Lens Extraction Surgery: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou; Panagiota Ntonti; Eleni Vlachou; Kimon Georgantzoglou; Georgios Labiris
Journal:  Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove)       Date:  2018

Review 7.  The evidence informing the surgeon's selection of intraocular lens on the basis of light transmittance properties.

Authors:  X Li; D Kelly; J M Nolan; J L Dennison; S Beatty
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Evaluation of activities of daily living following pseudophakic presbyopic correction.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Panagiota Ntonti; Maria Patsiamanidi; Haris Sideroudi; Kimon Georgantzoglou; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-19

Review 9.  AcrySof IQ PanOptix Intraocular Lens Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens and Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Clinical Overview.

Authors:  Rachapalle Reddi Sudhir; Arindam Dey; Shovan Bhattacharrya; Amit Bahulayan
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug

10.  Optical bench performance of a novel trifocal intraocular lens compared with a multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Shinwook Lee; Myoung Choi; Zaiwei Xu; Zeyu Zhao; Elsinore Alexander; Yueai Liu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a Lighting Facility for the Objective Assessment of the Visual Performance of Presbyopic Patients in a Series of Activities of Daily Living.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou; Panagiota Ntonti
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.