Literature DB >> 34866638

Genetic ancestry predicts male-female affiliation in a natural baboon hybrid zone.

Arielle S Fogel1,2, Emily M McLean1,3,4, Jacob B Gordon3, Elizabeth A Archie5,6, Jenny Tung2,3,6,7, Susan C Alberts2,3,6.   

Abstract

Opposite-sex social relationships are important predictors of fitness in many animals, including several group-living mammals. Consequently, understanding sources of variance in the tendency to form opposite-sex relationships is important for understanding social evolution. Genetic contributions are of particular interest due to their importance in long-term evolutionary change, but little is known about genetic effects on male-female relationships in social mammals, especially outside of the mating context. Here, we investigate the effects of genetic ancestry on male-female affiliative behaviour in a hybrid zone between the yellow baboon, Papio cynocephalus, and the anubis baboon, Papio anubis, in a population in which male-female social bonds are known predictors of life span. We place our analysis within the context of other social and demographic predictors of affiliative behaviour in baboons. Genetic ancestry was the most consistent predictor of opposite-sex affiliative behaviour we observed, with the exception of strong effects of dominance rank. Our results show that increased anubis genetic ancestry is associated with a subtle, but significantly higher, probability of opposite-sex affiliative behaviour, in both males and females. Additionally, pairs of anubis-like males and anubis-like females were the most likely to socially affiliate, resulting in moderate assortativity in grooming and proximity behaviour as a function of genetic ancestry. Our findings indicate that opposite-sex affiliative behaviour partially diverged during baboon evolution to differentiate yellow and anubis baboons, despite overall similarities in their social structures and mating systems. Furthermore, they suggest that affiliative behaviour may simultaneously promote and constrain baboon admixture, through additive and assortative effects of ancestry, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Papio anubis; Papio cynocephalus; baboon; genetic ancestry; grooming; hybrid zone; opposite-sex social bond

Year:  2021        PMID: 34866638      PMCID: PMC8635413          DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   3.039


  79 in total

1.  Alliance membership and kinship in wild male bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) of southeastern Australia.

Authors:  L M Möller; L B Beheregaray; R G Harcourt; M Krützen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel Falush; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Paternal relatedness and age proximity regulate social relationships among adult female rhesus macaques.

Authors:  A Widdig; P Nürnberg; M Krawczak; W J Streich; F B Bercovitch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Dopamine, oxytocin, and vasopressin receptor binding in the medial prefrontal cortex of monogamous and promiscuous voles.

Authors:  Michael D Smeltzer; J Thomas Curtis; Brandon J Aragona; Zuoxin Wang
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Oxytocin receptor distribution reflects social organization in monogamous and polygamous voles.

Authors:  T R Insel; L E Shapiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Better stay together: pair bond duration increases individual fitness independent of age-related variation.

Authors:  Oscar Sánchez-Macouzet; Cristina Rodríguez; Hugh Drummond
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Analysis of 100 high-coverage genomes from a pedigreed captive baboon colony.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Robinson; Saurabh Belsare; Shifra Birnbaum; Deborah E Newman; Jeannie Chan; Jeremy P Glenn; Betsy Ferguson; Laura A Cox; Jeffrey D Wall
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The comparative genomics and complex population history of Papio baboons.

Authors:  Jeffrey Rogers; Muthuswamy Raveendran; R Alan Harris; Thomas Mailund; Kalle Leppälä; Georgios Athanasiadis; Mikkel Heide Schierup; Jade Cheng; Kasper Munch; Jerilyn A Walker; Miriam K Konkel; Vallmer Jordan; Cody J Steely; Thomas O Beckstrom; Christina Bergey; Andrew Burrell; Dominik Schrempf; Angela Noll; Maximillian Kothe; Gisela H Kopp; Yue Liu; Shwetha Murali; Konstantinos Billis; Fergal J Martin; Matthieu Muffato; Laura Cox; James Else; Todd Disotell; Donna M Muzny; Jane Phillips-Conroy; Bronwen Aken; Evan E Eichler; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Carolin Kosiol; Mark A Batzer; Matthew W Hahn; Jenny Tung; Dietmar Zinner; Christian Roos; Clifford J Jolly; Richard A Gibbs; Kim C Worley
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 14.957

9.  A comparison of dominance rank metrics reveals multiple competitive landscapes in an animal society.

Authors:  Emily J Levy; Matthew N Zipple; Emily McLean; Fernando A Campos; Mauna Dasari; Arielle S Fogel; Mathias Franz; Laurence R Gesquiere; Jacob B Gordon; Laura Grieneisen; Bobby Habig; David J Jansen; Niki H Learn; Chelsea J Weibel; Jeanne Altmann; Susan C Alberts; Elizabeth A Archie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Paternity alone does not predict long-term investment in juveniles by male baboons.

Authors:  Liza R Moscovice; Marlies Heesen; Anthony Di Fiore; Robert M Seyfarth; Dorothy L Cheney
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.