Jang-Ho Park1, Sunwook Kim1, Maury A Nussbaum1, Divya Srinivasan2. 1. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. 2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA. Electronic address: sriniv5@clemson.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Back-support exoskeletons (BSEs) are a promising intervention to mitigate physical demands at work. Although growing evidence indicates that BSEs can reduce low-back physical demands, there is limited understanding of potential unintended consequences of BSE use, including the risk of falls. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does using a BSE adversely affect gait performance and stability, and are such effects dependent on specific BSE external torque characteristics? METHODS: Twenty participants (10 M, 10 F) completed five level over-ground walking trials and a five-minute treadmill walking trial while wearing a BSE (backX™) with three different levels of external torque (i.e., no torque, low torque, and high torque) and in a control (no-exoskeleton) condition. Spatiotemporal gait patterns, stride-to-stride gait variability measures, required coefficient-of-friction (RCoF), and minimum foot clearance (MFC) were determined, to assess gait performance. Gait stability was quantified using the maximum Lyapunov exponent (MLE) of trunk kinematics and the margin-of-stability (MoS). RESULTS: Using the backX™ with high supportive torque decreased slip risk (7% decrease in RCoF) and slightly improved trunk stability (3% decrease in MLE). However, it also decreased step length (1%), increased step width (10%) and increased gait variability (8-19%). Changes in MoS were complex: while MoS at heel strike decreased in the AP direction, it increased in the ML direction. There was a rather large decrease in MoS (26%) in the ML direction during the swing phase. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to quantify the effects of wearing a passive BSE with multiple supportive torque levels on gait performance and stability during level walking. Our results, showing that the external torque of the BSE may adversely affect gait step width, variability, and dynamic stability, can contribute to better design and practice guidelines to facilitate the safe adoption of BSEs in the workplace.
BACKGROUND: Back-support exoskeletons (BSEs) are a promising intervention to mitigate physical demands at work. Although growing evidence indicates that BSEs can reduce low-back physical demands, there is limited understanding of potential unintended consequences of BSE use, including the risk of falls. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does using a BSE adversely affect gait performance and stability, and are such effects dependent on specific BSE external torque characteristics? METHODS: Twenty participants (10 M, 10 F) completed five level over-ground walking trials and a five-minute treadmill walking trial while wearing a BSE (backX™) with three different levels of external torque (i.e., no torque, low torque, and high torque) and in a control (no-exoskeleton) condition. Spatiotemporal gait patterns, stride-to-stride gait variability measures, required coefficient-of-friction (RCoF), and minimum foot clearance (MFC) were determined, to assess gait performance. Gait stability was quantified using the maximum Lyapunov exponent (MLE) of trunk kinematics and the margin-of-stability (MoS). RESULTS: Using the backX™ with high supportive torque decreased slip risk (7% decrease in RCoF) and slightly improved trunk stability (3% decrease in MLE). However, it also decreased step length (1%), increased step width (10%) and increased gait variability (8-19%). Changes in MoS were complex: while MoS at heel strike decreased in the AP direction, it increased in the ML direction. There was a rather large decrease in MoS (26%) in the ML direction during the swing phase. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to quantify the effects of wearing a passive BSE with multiple supportive torque levels on gait performance and stability during level walking. Our results, showing that the external torque of the BSE may adversely affect gait step width, variability, and dynamic stability, can contribute to better design and practice guidelines to facilitate the safe adoption of BSEs in the workplace.