Literature DB >> 34863529

Amortization of gene replacement therapies: A health policy analysis exploring a mechanism for mitigating budget impact of high-cost treatments.

Monique Dabbous1, Mondher Toumi2, Steven Simoens3, Juergen Wasem4, Gauri Saal5, Yitong Wang2, José Luis Huerta Osuna6, Clément François2, Lieven Annemans7, Johann-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg8, Oriol Sola-Morales9, Daniel Malone10, Louis P Garrison11.   

Abstract

With gene replacement therapies (GRTs) increasingly and rapidly reaching the healthcare marketplace, the vast potential for improving patient health is matched by the potential budgetary impact for healthcare payers. GRTs are highly valuable given their potential life-extending or even curative benefits and may provide significant cost-offsets compared with standard of care. Current healthcare systems are, however, struggling to fund such valuable but costly therapies. Some payers have already implemented specific financing models to account for the new treatment paradigms, but these do not address the budget impact in the year of acquisition or administration of these costly technologies. This health policy analysis aimed to assess the rationale and feasibility of amortization, within the context of financing healthcare technologies, and specifically GRTs. Amortization is an accounting concept applied to intangible assets that allows for spreading the cost an intangible asset over time, allowing for repayment to occur via interest and principal payments sufficient to repay the intangible asset in full by its maturity. Our systematic scoping review on the amortization of healthcare technologies found a very small literature base with even that being unclear and inconsistent in its understanding of the issues. Where amortization was proposed as a solution for funding costly, but highly valuable GRTs, the concept was not fully investigated in detail, nor was the feasibility of the approach fully challenged. However, by providing clear definitions of relevant concepts along with an example of amortization models applied to some example GRTs, we propose that amortization can offer a promising method for funding of extraordinarily high-value healthcare technologies, thereby increasing market and patient access for these technologies. Nonetheless, healthcare accounting principles and financing guidelines must evolve to apply amortization to the rapidly developing GRTs.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amortization; Funding; Gene replacement therapies (grts); Gene therapies; Market access; Payment Models

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34863529     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  2 in total

1.  Critical Reflections on Reimbursement and Access of Advanced Therapies.

Authors:  Steven Simoens; Katrien De Groote; Cornelis Boersma
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 2.  Gene Therapy Evidence Generation and Economic Analysis: Pragmatic Considerations to Facilitate Fit-for-Purpose Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Tingting Qiu; Michal Pochopien; Shuyao Liang; Gauri Saal; Ewelina Paterak; Justyna Janik; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-02-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.