| Literature DB >> 34863209 |
Iñigo Murga1, Larraitz Aranburu2, Pascual A Gargiulo3, Juan-Carlos Gómez-Esteban2,4, José-Vicente Lafuente2,4.
Abstract
The maintained attention is the cause of great functional limitations in CFS/ME, a disease that mainly affects women in the central period of life. Cognitive function is explored using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the maintained attention using the Toulouse-Piéron test with which the Global Index of Attention and Perception (GIAP) is obtained, the fatigue using the visual analog scale and the perception of effort using the modified Borg scale. The final sample were 84 patients (66 women/18 men) who met diagnostic criteria (Fukuda-1994, Carruthers-2011) and 22 healthy controls (14 women/8 men). Most of patients maintain normal cognitive function, showing low or very low attention score in the 70% of patients with a marked cognitive fatigue compared to the control group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between genders in GIAP or fatigue for CFS/ME; however, sick women perceive cognitive effort higher than men. Deficits in sustained attention and the perception of fatigue, so effort after performing the proposed test are a sensitive and reliable indicator that allows us to substantiate a clinical suspicion and refer patients for further studies in order to confirm or rule out CFS/ME.Entities:
Keywords: Maintained attention; Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome; Toulouse-Piéron test
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34863209 PMCID: PMC8645147 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-021-03153-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 8.440
Data of the tests used in the cognitive evaluation
| VariableTest | CFS/ME | Control | p | CFS/ME | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women | Men | p | ||||
| Cognitive functionMoCA | 25.76 (2.45) 18–30 | 27 (2.33) 21–30 | * | 26.06 (2.26) 18–30 | 24.66 (2.80) 18–29 | * |
| Global Index Attention and Perception (GIAP)Toulouse−Piéron | 1.94 (0.80) 0–3 | 3.04 (0.76) 1–5 | *** | 1.98 (0.76) 0–3 | 1.77 (0.91) 0–3 | |
| Pre test- fatigueVAS | 62.20 (17.10) 0–100 | 5.45 (16.43) 0–70 | *** | 63.40 (16.76) 0–100 | 57.77 (17.57) 20–95 | |
| Post test- fatigueVAS | 77.91 (17.84) 10–100 | 6.36 (18.71) 0–70 | *** | 78.63 (17.87) 10–100 | 75.27 (17.51) 30–100 | |
| Perception of effort cognitiveBorg modified | 7.70 (3.01) 3–10 | 1.77 (0.99) 1–5 | *** | 8.12 (2.81) 3–10 | 6.16 (3.23) 3–10 | * |
U Mann–Whitney test
t-student test (CFS/ME: women pre test- fatigue vs. men pre test- fatigue, women post test- fatigue vs. men post test- fatigue)
Cognitive function: Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA). Cut-off point: 26. Mild Cognitive Deterioration (< 21)
Global Index Attention and Perception (GIAP): Toulouse-Piéron test. 0 = No evaluable (abandons the test due to very high fatigue), 1 = Very low, 2 = Low, 3 = Medium, 4 = High, 5 = Very high
Fatigue: Visual analogue scale (VAS). 0 mm = No fatigue, < 40 mm = Mild, ≥ 40 mm–< 70 mm = Moderate, ≥ 70 mm = Severe, 100 mm = Maximum
Perception of cognitive effort: Borg modified scale. 0 = Nothing at all, 1 = Very, very light, 2 = Very light, 3 = Moderate, 4 = Something hard, 5 = Hard, 6 = Hard, 7 = Very hard, 8 = Very hard, 9 = Very hard, 10 = Very very hard
* p < 0.05
** P < 0.01
*** P < 0.001
Fig. 1Maintained attention with Global Index of Attention and Perception (GIAP). The figure reflects the distribution of the number of patients, placed above the bars (ordinate axis), for the categorization of the Global Index Attention and Perception (GIAP). Note the cognitive deficit in maintained attention for CFS/ME in 10 min (76%- N = 64). Five sicks are unable to finish the test due to very high mental fatigue
Data of perception fatigue pre vs. post with Tolouse-Piéron test
| VariableTest | CFS/ME | Control | CFS/ME | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women | Men | |||
| Pre-test fatigue vs. post-test fatigueVAS | *** | *** | *** | |
U Mann–Whitney test (control, CFS/ME men)
t-student test (CFS/ME, CFS/ME women)
The marked and rapid fatigability in CFS/ME in 10 min, with no impact on control. There are differences in women and men with CFS/ME between pre-test fatigue vs. post-test
* p < 0.05
** P < 0.01
*** P < 0.001