| Literature DB >> 34862222 |
Amitava Banerjee1, Laura Pasea2, Sinduja Manohar3, Alvina G Lai4, Eade Hemingway5, Izaak Sofer6, Michail Katsoulis2, Harpreet Sood7, Andrew Morris3, Caroline Cake3, Natalie K Fitzpatrick4, Bryan Williams8, Spiros Denaxas9, Harry Hemingway10.
Abstract
Patients and public have sought mortality risk information throughout the pandemic, but their needs may not be served by current risk prediction tools. Our mixed methods study involved: (1) systematic review of published risk tools for prognosis, (2) provision and patient testing of new mortality risk estimates for people with high-risk conditions and (3) iterative patient and public involvement and engagement with qualitative analysis. Only one of 53 (2%) previously published risk tools involved patients or the public, while 11/53 (21%) had publicly accessible portals, but all for use by clinicians and researchers.Among people with a wide range of underlying conditions, there has been sustained interest and engagement in accessible and tailored, pre- and postpandemic mortality information. Informed by patient feedback, we provide such information in 'five clicks' (https://covid19-phenomics.org/OurRiskCoV.html), as context for decision making and discussions with health professionals and family members. Further development requires curation and regular updating of NHS data and wider patient and public engagement. © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: coronavirus; mortality; patient and public involvement; risk information
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34862222 PMCID: PMC8806292 DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0386
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Med (Lond) ISSN: 1470-2118 Impact factor: 2.659