Background: The approach for surgical treatment of patients with low-/intermediate-risk T1T2N0/Nx well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC)-total thyroidectomy (TT) versus thyroid lobectomy (TL)-remains a controversial topic. Conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) would be the gold standard to address this issue. However, this is challenging due to excellent survival outcomes, and therefore, high number of patients and long-term follow-up would be required. As an alternative to RCT, we have used propensity score (PS) matching to determine if T1T2N0/Nx patients selected to have TL had equivalent outcomes to a similar group treated with TT. Methods: After institutional review board approval, a database of 6259 patients with WDTC treated with primary surgery at our institution between 1985 and 2016 was analyzed to identify patients with T1T2N0/Nx cancers. Of 3756 patients identified, 943 were managed by TL and 2813 by TT. To control for possible confounders and reduce potential bias, we selected age, sex, histology, 131I therapy, American Thyroid Association risk, and American Joint Committee Cancer stage as our PS matching criteria. Subsequently, 918 TL patients were successfully matched with 918 TT patients. The Pearson χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical covariates, and Student's t-test was used for comparison of continuous variables between the two groups. Disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: After PS matching, there were no significant differences between TL and TT patients for OS (10-year OS: 92.2% vs. 91.3%, p = 0.9668), DSS (10-year DSS: 100% vs. 99.1%, p = 0.1967), or RFS (10-year RFS: 99.5% vs. 98.3%, p = 0.079). Conclusions: For low-/intermediate-risk patients with intrathyroidal thyroid cancer <4 cm, patients selected for TL have similar survival outcomes to a comparable group treated by TT.
Background: The approach for surgical treatment of patients with low-/intermediate-risk T1T2N0/Nx well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC)-total thyroidectomy (TT) versus thyroid lobectomy (TL)-remains a controversial topic. Conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) would be the gold standard to address this issue. However, this is challenging due to excellent survival outcomes, and therefore, high number of patients and long-term follow-up would be required. As an alternative to RCT, we have used propensity score (PS) matching to determine if T1T2N0/Nx patients selected to have TL had equivalent outcomes to a similar group treated with TT. Methods: After institutional review board approval, a database of 6259 patients with WDTC treated with primary surgery at our institution between 1985 and 2016 was analyzed to identify patients with T1T2N0/Nx cancers. Of 3756 patients identified, 943 were managed by TL and 2813 by TT. To control for possible confounders and reduce potential bias, we selected age, sex, histology, 131I therapy, American Thyroid Association risk, and American Joint Committee Cancer stage as our PS matching criteria. Subsequently, 918 TL patients were successfully matched with 918 TT patients. The Pearson χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical covariates, and Student's t-test was used for comparison of continuous variables between the two groups. Disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: After PS matching, there were no significant differences between TL and TT patients for OS (10-year OS: 92.2% vs. 91.3%, p = 0.9668), DSS (10-year DSS: 100% vs. 99.1%, p = 0.1967), or RFS (10-year RFS: 99.5% vs. 98.3%, p = 0.079). Conclusions: For low-/intermediate-risk patients with intrathyroidal thyroid cancer <4 cm, patients selected for TL have similar survival outcomes to a comparable group treated by TT.
Entities:
Keywords:
early stage; intermediate risk; lobectomy; low risk; propensity matching; thyroid cancer; total thyroidectomy
Authors: Samer R Rajjoub; Huan Yan; Natalie A Calcatera; Kristine Kuchta; Chi-Hsiung E Wang; Waseem Lutfi; Tricia A Moo-Young; David J Winchester; Richard A Prinz Journal: Surgery Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Clifford Y Ko; Andrew K Stewart; David P Winchester; Mark S Talamonti; Cord Sturgeon Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Emad Kandil; Barath Krishnan; Salem I Noureldine; Lu Yao; Ralph P Tufano Journal: ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 1.538
Authors: Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam; John Pura; Lin Gu; Michaela A Dinan; Douglas S Tyler; Shelby D Reed; Randall Scheri; Sanziana A Roman; Julie A Sosa Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: J Ferlay; M Colombet; I Soerjomataram; C Mathers; D M Parkin; M Piñeros; A Znaor; F Bray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 7.396