| Literature DB >> 34859318 |
Jie Xu1, Jian Cui1, Shaomin Yang1, Yu Han1, Xi Guo1, Yuhang Che1, Dongfang Xu1, Chenyang Duan1, Wenjing Zhao1, Kunpeng Guo2, Wanli Ma3, Baomin Xu4, Jianxi Yao5, Zhike Liu6, Shengzhong Liu7,8.
Abstract
The application of ionic liquids in perovskite has attracted wide-spread attention for its astounding performance improvement of perovskite solar cells (PSCs). However, the detailed mechanisms behind the improvement remain mysterious. Herein, a series of imidazolium-based ionic liquids (IILs) with different cations and anions is systematically investigated to elucidate the passivation mechanism of IILs on inorganic perovskites. It is found that IILs display the following advantages: (1) They form ionic bonds with Cs+ and Pb2+ cations on the surface and at the grain boundaries of perovskite films, which could effectively heal/reduce the Cs+/I- vacancies and Pb-related defects; (2) They serve as a bridge between the perovskite and the hole-transport-layer for effective charge extraction and transfer; and (3) They increase the hydrophobicity of the perovskite surface to further improve the stability of the CsPbI2Br PSCs. The combination of the above effects results in suppressed non-radiative recombination loss in CsPbI2Br PSCs and an impressive power conversion efficiency of 17.02%. Additionally, the CsPbI2Br PSCs with IILs surface modification exhibited improved ambient and light illumination stability. Our results provide guidance for an in-depth understanding of the passivation mechanism of IILs in inorganic perovskites.Entities:
Keywords: High efficiency; Imidazolium; Inorganic perovskite; Ionic liquids; Passivation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34859318 PMCID: PMC8639893 DOI: 10.1007/s40820-021-00763-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomicro Lett ISSN: 2150-5551
Fig. 1a XRD patterns and (200) diffraction peaks and b UV–vis absorption spectra of perovskite films with different cation-based IILs treatments. c ToF–SIMS depth profile of the CsPbI2Br/BMMIMBF4 perovskite film. d Top-view SEM images of the CsPbI2Br films with different cation-based IILs treatments. e PL and f TRPL spectra of CsPbI2Br perovskite films with different cation-based IILs treatments
Fig. 2a FTIR spectra of BMMIMBF4 solution with or without PbI2/CsI additive. XPS spectra of b Cs 3d, c F 1 s of BMMIMBF4 solution with or without CsI additive. XPS spectra of d Pb 4f, and e N 1 s of BMMIMBF4 solution with or without PbI2 additive. f 19F NMR spectra of BMMIMBF4 solution with or without CsI additive. g 19F NMR spectra of BMMIMBF4 solution with or without PbI2 additive
Fig. 3a Schematic image of a CsPbI2Br PSC with the structure FTO/TiO2/CsPbI2Br(IILs)/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au. b J-V curves and c schematic energy-level alignment of the CsPbI2Br PSC with BMMIMBF4 modification. d EQE spectra, e Box charts of PCE, f stable output curves, g Mott-Schottky plots, h Nyquist plots and i open-circuit voltage dependence on light intensity of the CsPbI2Br PSC with BMMIMBF4 modification. j Space-charge-limited current versus voltage for the FTO/TiO2/CsPbI2Br/PCBM/Ag and FTO/TiO2/CsPbI2Br(BMMIMBF4)/PCBM/Ag devices. k J-V curves under dark conditions of the CsPbI2Br PSC without or with BMMIMBF4 modification
Summary of the photovoltaic parameters of the CsPbI2Br PSCs treated using IILs with different cations
| Sample | FF (%) | PCE (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1.28 | 15.81 | 77.10 | 15.62 |
| BMMIMBF4 | 1.33 | 15.96 | 80.08 | 17.02 |
| BMIMBF4 | 1.32 | 15.93 | 78.21 | 16.45 |
| PMIMBF4 | 1.31 | 15.78 | 77.74 | 16.09 |
| HMIMBF4 | 1.30 | 15.77 | 76.33 | 15.66 |
| HMMIMBF4 | 1.27 | 15.62 | 76.74 | 15.25 |
Fig. 4a Schematic image of a CsPbI2Br PSC with the structure FTO/TiO2/CsPbI2Br(IILs)/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au. b J-V curves and c Nyquist plots of CsPbI2Br treated using IILs with different anions. d XRD patterns and (200) diffraction peaks, e PL and f TRPL spectra of CsPbI2Br perovskite films treated using IILs with different anions
Summary of the photovoltaic parameters of the CsPbI2Br PSCs treated using IILs with different anions
| Sample | FF (%) | PCE (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1.27 | 15.45 | 77.86 | 15.28 |
| BMMIMBF4 | 1.31 | 15.95 | 80.63 | 16.89 |
| BMMIMCl | 1.29 | 15.77 | 77.57 | 15.78 |
| BMMIMPF6 | 1.27 | 15.62 | 76.74 | 15.25 |
| BMIMBr | 1.26 | 15.88 | 76.27 | 15.32 |
| BMIMI | 1.26 | 15.97 | 77.85 | 15.67 |
Fig. 5a Calculated structure illustrating the passivation of an I− vacancy at the CsPbI2Br surface by a BF4− anion. b The relative interaction strengths of different anions with the I− vacancy at the surface of the perovskite. c Calculated structure illustrating the interaction of Pb-I antisite with BF4−. d The binding energy of different anions with Pb-I antisite defect. e Calculated structure illustrating the interaction of PbI2 with BF4− or BMMIM+. f The binding energy of different ions with PbI2
Fig. 6a Photographs of control and BMMIMBF4-treated CsPbI2Br films aged in ambient air conditions (RH: ~ 25%, T = 25 °C). b Air stability and c light stability of the CsPbI2Br PSCs with or without BMMIMBF4 treatment