Jay F Yu1, Hannah E Goldblatt1, Katie Alter-Troilo1, Emily Hetzel1, Matthew I Goldblatt2. 1. Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA. 2. Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA. mgoldbla@mcw.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are many materials available for the reinforcement of complex abdominal wall reconstruction, including permanent synthetic, biologic, and absorbable synthetic meshes. The recurrence rate of complex hernia repairs beyond 5 years has not been reported. We hypothesized that the use of absorbable synthetic mesh in clean wounds would yield favorable long-term outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who underwent open complex ventral hernia repair with clean wounds (CDC class 1) using absorbable synthetic mesh (Bio-A, Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) in the retrorectus position were retrospectively reviewed. Chart review and a validated telephone questionnaire to screen for recurrence were utilized to evaluate and document hernia recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were included in this study. Patients were followed for recurrences for up to 105 months, with a mean follow-up time of 62.4 months (5.2 years). The total number of midline hernia recurrence was 7 out of the original 49 patients (14%). The mean and median recurrence time are 37.4 and 38.8 months, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated hernia recurrence rate as 2%, 4.6%, 7.1%, 12%, 15%, and 18% at 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of absorbable synthetic mesh in clean wound ventral hernia repair resulted in favorable long-term recurrence rates. The recurrence rate of absorbable synthetic mesh is similar to that of permanent synthetic mesh, which gives a viable option for patients in whom permanent synthetic mesh is not an option.
BACKGROUND: There are many materials available for the reinforcement of complex abdominal wall reconstruction, including permanent synthetic, biologic, and absorbable synthetic meshes. The recurrence rate of complex hernia repairs beyond 5 years has not been reported. We hypothesized that the use of absorbable synthetic mesh in clean wounds would yield favorable long-term outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who underwent open complex ventral hernia repair with clean wounds (CDC class 1) using absorbable synthetic mesh (Bio-A, Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) in the retrorectus position were retrospectively reviewed. Chart review and a validated telephone questionnaire to screen for recurrence were utilized to evaluate and document hernia recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were included in this study. Patients were followed for recurrences for up to 105 months, with a mean follow-up time of 62.4 months (5.2 years). The total number of midline hernia recurrence was 7 out of the original 49 patients (14%). The mean and median recurrence time are 37.4 and 38.8 months, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated hernia recurrence rate as 2%, 4.6%, 7.1%, 12%, 15%, and 18% at 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of absorbable synthetic mesh in clean wound ventral hernia repair resulted in favorable long-term recurrence rates. The recurrence rate of absorbable synthetic mesh is similar to that of permanent synthetic mesh, which gives a viable option for patients in whom permanent synthetic mesh is not an option.
Authors: Rebeccah B Baucom; Jenny Ousley; Irene D Feurer; Gloria B Beveridge; Richard A Pierce; Michael D Holzman; Kenneth W Sharp; Benjamin K Poulose Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Marc Miserez; An P Jairam; Geesien S A Boersema; Yves Bayon; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: John Scott Roth; Gary J Anthone; Don J Selzer; Benjamin K Poulose; James G Bittner; William W Hope; Raymond M Dunn; Robert G Martindale; Matthew I Goldblatt; David B Earle; John R Romanelli; Gregory J Mancini; Jacob A Greenberg; John G Linn; Eduardo Parra-Davila; Bryan J Sandler; Corey R Deeken; Guy R Voeller Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Kamal M F Itani; Michael Rosen; Daniel Vargo; Samir S Awad; George Denoto; Charles E Butler Journal: Surgery Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Alfredo M Carbonell; Cory N Criss; William S Cobb; Yuri W Novitsky; Michael J Rosen Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-09-14 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Jeremy Warren; Shivani S Desai; Nicole D Boswell; Benjamin H Hancock; Hamza Abbad; Joseph A Ewing; Alfredo M Carbonell; William S Cobb Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2020-01-16 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Juliann E Cho; Melissa C Helm; Joseph H Helm; Neil Mier; Andrew S Kastenmeier; Jon C Gould; Matthew I Goldblatt Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Michael J Rosen; Joel J Bauer; Marco Harmaty; Alfredo M Carbonell; William S Cobb; Brent Matthews; Matthew I Goldblatt; Don J Selzer; Benjamin K Poulose; Bibi M E Hansson; Camiel Rosman; James J Chao; Garth R Jacobsen Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Karen Baylón; Perla Rodríguez-Camarillo; Alex Elías-Zúñiga; Jose Antonio Díaz-Elizondo; Robert Gilkerson; Karen Lozano Journal: Membranes (Basel) Date: 2017-08-22
Authors: Ankoor A Talwar; Nikhita J Perry; Phoebe B McAuliffe; Abhishek A Desai; Sheri Thrippleton; Robyn B Broach; John P Fischer Journal: Hernia Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 2.920