Literature DB >> 34859274

Social Media as a Tool to Educate Plastic Surgeons on Patients' Concerns Before and After Cosmetic Breast Surgeries.

Nir Shaul1,2, Eran Hadad3,4, Andre Ofek3,4, Lior Heller3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rapid evolution of the social media platform has had a major effect on the field of medicine.
OBJECTIVE: To identify patterns, trends and patients' concerns before and after aesthetic surgeries involving breast implants, by analyzing social media posts.
METHODS: We examined comments posted on popular Israeli online public forums between January 2019 and May 2021, regarding: breast augmentation, mastopexy-augmentation and breast implant removal.
RESULTS: During the study period, 561 comments were posted on the three forums investigated: 165 pre-operative and 396 post-operative. In the pre-operative period, the main interests were implant size, type and location, as discussed in 69 posts (42%). During the first two months post-operative, questions reflected concerns regarding post-operative instructions, wound management and asymmetry: 76 (43%), 59 (34%) and 27 (16%), respectively. These topics continued to be in focus up to one year post-operative. Beyond the first post-operative year, patients' main interests were breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (25 posts, 28%), capsule formation (23 posts, 26%) and systemic effects (23 posts, 26%).
CONCLUSIONS: Social media harnessing to identify patterns, trends and patient concerns pre- and post-aesthetic breast surgeries is a novel approach. Misinformation was common, particularly in comments posted more than one year post-operative. Four topics that especially concerned patients in the immediate and late post-operative period were asymmetric results, breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, capsule removal and systemic effects. We advise surgeon and plastic surgeon societies to issue position papers on controversial subjects, to counter the dissemination of potentially misleading information. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266.
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aesthetic breast surgeries; Breast augmentation; Breast implants removal; Breast mastopexy-augmentation; Forum; Patient education; Plastic surgeon; Social media

Year:  2021        PMID: 34859274     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02676-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  14 in total

1.  Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetries: 4D photography.

Authors:  Allen Gabriel; Sharon Fritzsche; Craig Creasman; Waheed Baqai; David Mordaunt; G Patrick Maxwell
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.283

2.  Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application.

Authors:  M Westreich
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  A method of assessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application.

Authors:  T P Brown; C Ringrose; R E Hyland; A A Cole; T M Brotherston
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1999-07

4.  Self-reported "worth it" rating of aesthetic surgery in social media.

Authors:  Mark C Domanski; Naveen Cavale
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Social media use and impact on plastic surgery practice.

Authors:  Andrew J Vardanian; Nicholas Kusnezov; Daniel D Im; James C Lee; Reza Jarrahy
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  An approach that integrates patient education and informed consent in breast augmentation.

Authors:  John B Tebbetts; Terrye B Tebbetts
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  The process of breast augmentation: four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients.

Authors:  William P Adams
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Harnessing the cloud of patient experience: using social media to detect poor quality healthcare.

Authors:  Felix Greaves; Daniel Ramirez-Cano; Christopher Millett; Ara Darzi; Liam Donaldson
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 7.035

9.  Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetry in breast augmentation: a retrospective analysis of 100 patients.

Authors:  Rod J Rohrich; Winfield Hartley; Spencer Brown
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  How patients' use of social media impacts their interactions with healthcare professionals.

Authors:  A Benetoli; T F Chen; P Aslani
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.