Literature DB >> 3485912

The diffusion of MRI: patterns of siting and ownership in an era of changing incentives.

A L Hillman, J S Schwartz.   

Abstract

The rate and pattern of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) siting and ownership are examined in the context of the current turbulent health-care environment. By the end of 1984, 151 MRI units were located at 134 different sites. There was one MRI unit for every 1.55 million Americans. Most of the largest metropolitan areas had at least one unit. Overall, however, the diffusion rate of MRI has lagged behind that of computed tomography (CT). Trends in magnet preference, siting, and ownership are evolving. While the majority of all units are located within hospitals, the diffusion of nonhospital-based MRI units is accelerating. The deployment of hospital-based units is progressing at a slower rate, largely limited to academic institutions and urban centers. Purchase of superconducting and permanent magnets is accelerating, while that of resistive units is decreasing. Likewise, there is a trend toward adoption of intermediate (0.5 T-0.6 T) and large (1.0 T or 1.5 T) magnets. Ownership arrangements are highly varied and characterized by increased efforts at risk-sharing, trends that reflect a more competitive, profit-oriented medical-care environment. An analysis of recent health-policy initiatives and evolving market factors helps to explain some of these observations. Increased cost-consciousness, prospective reimbursement systems, loopholes in current regulations, and increased competition among health-care providers are influencing the diffusion of MRI and may herald the fate of other expensive medical technologies in the near future.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3485912     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.146.5.963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  4 in total

Review 1.  Understanding financing options for PACS implementation. Picture archiving and communication systems.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Developing an Appropriateness Criteria for Knee MRI Using the Rand Appropriateness Method (RAM)-2013.

Authors:  Hossein Ebrahimipour; Seyedeh Zahra Mirfeizi; Ali Vafaee Najar; Amir Reza Kachooei; Amir Shahriar Ariamanesh; Reza Ganji; Habibollah Esmaeeli; Hedayat Salari; Marjan Vejdani
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-03-15

3.  Response of patients to the introduction of a private Magnetic Resonance Imaging service in Western Jamaica.

Authors:  Lennox Anderson-Jackson; Donovan A McGrowder; Paul A Bourne; Tazhmoye Crawford; Wayne H A Whittaker
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2009-10

4.  Developing Criteria for Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Using RAND Appropriateness Method (RAM).

Authors:  Ali Keshtkaran; Mohammad Hadi Bagheri; Rahim Ostovar; Hedayat Salari; Majid Reza Farokhi; Atefeh Esfandiari; Hossein Yousefimanesh
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 0.212

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.